Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The US features of benign and malignant nodules overlap, and benign thyroid lesions can mimic thyroid malignancy on US. Benign cystic nodules after spontaneous collapse or needle aspiration, can mimic malignant thyroid nodules. Our aim was to evaluate the US features of CBCNs of the thyroid that distinguish such nodules from malignant thyroid nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: US and clinical findings in 13 patients, each with a single CBCN, were evaluated to determine if they showed >50% cystic content on initial US or CT and >30% decrease in maximum diameter on follow-up US. We compared these findings with those of 26 patients, each with a single surgically confirmed PTMC. US scans were analyzed for internal content, shape, margin, echogenicity, presence of echogenic dots suggesting micro- and macrocalcification, inner isoechoic rim, and low-echoic halo.
RESULTS: Six of the 13 (46%) CBCNs were classified as malignant on US due to their marked hypoechogenicity, microcalcification, or spiculated margins. US features that differed between CBCNs and PTMCs were shape (ovoid-to-round versus taller-than-wide, P = .016); margins (ill-defined versus spiculated, P < .000); low-echoic halo (P < .000); inner isoechoic rim (P < .000) with high negative predictive values (100%, 91%, 91%, and 89%, respectively); and clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy (59%, 80%, 82%, and 85%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: US features helpful for differential diagnosis of CBCNs from PTMCs include shape, margin, and the presence of an inner isoechoic rim and a low-echoic halo. Familiarity with US features suggesting CBCNs may be helpful in reducing unnecessary repeated FNABs.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- CBCN
- collapsing benign cystic nodule
- FNAB
- fine needle aspiration biopsy
- PTMC
- papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
- US
- sonography
High-resolution US has led to the identification of many nodules in the thyroid.1 Most of these incidental thyroid nodules are benign; only a small percentage (9.2%–14.8%) are malignant.2–4 US features predictive of malignant nodules include a taller-than-wide shape, irregular or spiculated margins, marked hypoechogenicity, and the presence of micro- or macrocalcifications.2–8 Purely cystic nodules, predominantly cystic nodules with comet-tail artifacts and spongiform appearance, are US features predictive of benign thyroid nodules.8
The US features of benign and malignant nodules sometimes overlap, and benign thyroid lesions can mimic thyroid malignancy on US. This similarity, in turn, can lead to unnecessary biopsies. CBCNs, which occur either spontaneously or after needle aspiration, can mimic malignant thyroid nodules.9 The US features of CBCNs that differentiate them from malignant thyroid nodules have not yet been determined and, we therefore, sought to evaluate these.
Materials and Methods
Patient Selection
This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board, and informed-consent documents were waived. We reviewed the computerized medical records and US images of the 2529 patients who underwent thyroid US in our institution from January to June 2007. CBCN was diagnosed when nodules showed >50% cystic content on initial US or CT and there was a >30% decrease in the long diameter of the initial nodule on follow-up US. We identified 13 patients, each with a single CBCN. During a mean follow-up period of 13 months (range, 3–34 months), 4 of the 13 CBCNs showed >50% decreases in the long diameter without pathologic confirmation. The 9 other CBCNs were histologically diagnosed as benign follicular cell lesions (n = 4), cystic change with macrophages (n = 4), and colloid cyst (n = 1) (Table 1). Mean patient age was 54 years, with a range of 39–68 years, and the mean diameters of the CBCNs on initial and follow-up images were 1.4 cm (range, 0.7–5.0 cm) and 0.5 cm (range, 0–0.9 cm), respectively
Clinical and cytologic data of patients with collapsing benign cystic nodules
For each patient with a CBCN, we also enrolled patients who underwent US and surgery during the same period for PTMC of similar nodule size range. Of the 427 patients who had surgically confirmed PTMCs, we recruited 26 consecutive patients, each with a single PTMC. The mean age of these patients was 42 years (range, 22–63 years), and the mean diameter of the PTMCs was 0.7 cm (range, 0.3–1.0 cm).
Analysis of US Findings and Statistics
US examinations were performed with an HDI 5000 scanner (Philips-Advanced Technology Laboratories, Bothell, Washington) by using electronically focused near-field probes with a bandwidth of 7–12 MHz. All US examinations were performed by radiologists with 4–7 years of experience.
US images were retrospectively reviewed independently by 2 experienced radiologists (K.S.J. and J.H.L., with 7 and 13 years, respectively, of clinical experience in performing and evaluating thyroid US). Both reviewers had no information on patient clinical history, previous imaging results, or pathologic results. Any discrepancies between the 2 reviewers were resolved by consensus.
Individual US features evaluated included nodule shape (oval-to-round, irregular, or taller-than-wide), margins (well-defined, ill-defined, or spiculated), internal content (solid, predominantly solid, predominantly cystic, or cystic), and echogenicity (markedly hypoechoic, hypoechoic, isoechoic, or hyperechoic). US results were also evaluated for the presence of echogenic dots suggesting microcalcification, macrocalcification, inner isoechoic rim, and low echoic halo. An inner isoechoic rim was defined as a thin continuous isoechoic rim along more than half the inner margin of a nodule (Fig 1). A low-echoic halo was defined as a hypoechoic rim surrounding the outer margin of a nodule. All other US features were based on previously published criteria.2,5–8,10
A 59-year-old woman with a CBCN. A routine transverse US shows a 0.8-cm-long round hypoechoic nodule, with a peripheral low-echoic halo (arrowheads) and an inner isoechoic rim (arrows). Subsequent pathologic examination after surgery confirmed degenerating nodular hyperplasia in the left thyroid gland and papillary carcinoma in the right thyroid gland (not shown).
Statistical analysis was performed by using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, Version 12.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). Each of the US features was analyzed for its association with CBCNs versus malignant nodules. The relevant features were compared with the final diagnosis to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall diagnostic accuracy. US findings in the CBCN and PTMC groups were compared by using the Fisher exact test, and nodule size was compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Demographic data, including age and sex, did not differ significantly between the CBCN and PTMC groups (P > .05). The contents of all 13 CBCNs showed a solid appearance on US, and all 13 had an ovoid-to-round shape and were hypo- or marked hypoechogenic. In addition, 11 CBCNs had ill-defined margins and inner isoechoic rims, while 6 had echogenic dots suggesting microcalcification and 10 had low-echoic haloes (Fig 2).
A 68-year-old man with a collapsing benign cystic nodule. A, A transverse US of the thyroid gland shows a 0.6-cm-long ill-defined ovoid markedly hypoechoic nodule with suspicious microcalcification. Note a low-echoic halo and an inner isoechoic rim (arrowheads) surrounding the nodule. B, A transverse US performed 1 year ago reveals a 1.7-cm-long predominantly cystic nodule with an isoechoic solid component at the same location.
In comparison, the contents of all 26 PTMCs had a solid appearance on US. All were hypo- or marked hypoechogenic, and 20 had spiculated margins. Microcalcification was observed in 15 patients, and macrocalcification, in 23. Five PTMCs had an inner isoechoic rim, and 3 had low-echoic haloes (Fig 3). Although their incidence rates were low, taller-than-wide shape and macrocalcification were observed only in PTMCs.
A 42-year-old woman with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Transverse sonogram shows a 0.6-cm-long spiculated taller-than-wide hypoechoic nodule (arrows) within the right lobe of the thyroid gland, which is suspicious for malignancy by US criteria. Note there is neither a low-echoic halo nor an inner isoechoic rim at the periphery. Subsequent cytologic and histologic examination confirmed the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Among the US features, shape, margin, inner isoechoic rim, and low-echoic halo differed significantly between CBCNs and PTMCs (Table 2). The overall diagnostic accuracies of ovoid-to-round shape, ill-defined margins, inner isoechoic rim, and low-echoic halo in differentiating CBCNs from PTMCs were 59%, 80%, 82%, and 85%, respectively (Table 3).
US features of collapsing benign cystic nodules and papillary thyroid microcarcinomasa
Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the individual US features suggesting CBCNsa
Discussion
Several studies have assessed the natural history of thyroid nodules,11,12 with 113 reporting that the most common outcome of benign thyroid nodules, untreated for an average of 15 years after the first examination, was a decrease in nodule size, including disappearance (52.9%), with a decrease in size being more prominent in cystic nodules. In contrast, others have reported that 39% of benign thyroid nodules increase in size during follow-up, with cystic nodules being more likely to maintain or decrease in size than solid nodules.11
The revised guidelines of the American Thyroid Association in 2009 recommended that FNAB is warranted for subcentimeter nodules with suspicious findings or in patients at high risk, including patients exposed to radiation or those with a family history of papillary thyroid carcinoma.14 Mazzaferri and Sipos have recommended, however, that nodules <5 mm should not be biopsied because of high rates of false-positive results on US and of inadequate cytology.15 Recently, Moon et al8 reported that US features have been found to depend on the size of thyroid cancers, with subcentimeter tumors having a lower frequency of microcalcification but higher frequencies of marked hypoechogenicity, taller-than-wide shape, and spiculated margin. Because these characteristics are also more frequent in smaller benign nodules, the false-positive rate of malignancy may be higher for smaller nodules.
Cytologically diagnosed benign thyroid nodules after aspiration may have US features similar to those of malignant thyroid nodules,9,16 including marked hypoechogenicity due to solid-appearing internal content. Of the 13 CBCNs that were examined in this study, 6 (46%) were classified as malignant by US criteria. These US features may be due to collapse of the cystic cavity, infarction of the solid component, and other destructive processes such as hemorrhage, followed by replacement by fibrous tissue.17 These pathologic alterations may appear on US as marked hypoechogenicity of a nodule with ill-defined margins.
Other than marked hypoechogenicity of solid-appearing internal content, we found that the US features of CBCNs that differed significantly from PTMCs were ovoid-to-round shape, ill-defined margins, microcalcification, inner isoechoic rim, and low-echoic halo. Of these US features, inner isoechoic rim and low-echoic halo showed the highest diagnostic accuracies with acceptable negative predictive values. Inner isoechoic rim was the US feature that was first assessed in this study. We defined “inner isoechoic rim” as a thin continuous isoechoic rim present along >50% of the inner margin of a thyroid nodule. The pathologic correlate of this is unclear; it may correspond to intact still-solid components at the periphery of a nodule, which appear as isoechoic rims lining the inner wall of pre-existing cystic nodules. Low-echoic halo, a hypoechoic rim surrounding the outer margin of a nodule, can represent a tumor capsule, a fibrotic pseudocapsule, compressed normal thyroid tissue, or chronic inflammatory infiltrates.16,18 These features may be common to benign lesions,19–21 a finding supported by our results.
Our study had several limitations, including its retrospective design and the small number of patients, which may have introduced a selection bias. However, because the purpose of this study was not to assess the general US features of CBCNs but to determine the specific US features that distinguish CBCNs from PTMCs, this bias may not have had a large impact on our results. Our results, however, suggest the need for larger scale prospective studies.
Conclusions
We found that 46% of CBCNs could be misclassified as malignant on US because they showed marked hypoechogenicity, microcalcification, and/or spiculated margins. Among the US features that can be used to distinguish CBCNs and PTMCs are the presence of an inner isoechoic rim and low-echoic halo, nodule shape, and margin. Therefore, although US features suggesting CBCNs may not completely abrogate the need for FNAB, familiarity with the US findings of CBCNs may reduce the incidence of unnecessary repeated FNABs. Furthermore, rather than performing immediate FNAB, nodules with US features suggesting CBCN can be followed-up, especially in patients without a high likelihood of malignancy.
Footnotes
-
Disclosures: Kyung Soon Jeong, Research Support (including provision of equipment or materials): Kosin University.
References
- Received December 27, 2010.
- Accepted after revision April 23, 2011.
- © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
