Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleInterventional

Immediate and Midterm Results following Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device

W. McAuliffe, V. Wycoco, H. Rice, C. Phatouros, T.J. Singh and J. Wenderoth
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2012, 33 (1) 164-170; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2727
W. McAuliffe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Wycoco
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Rice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Phatouros
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.J. Singh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Wenderoth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A number of flow-diverting devices have become available for endovascular occlusion of cerebral aneurysms. This article reports immediate and midterm results in treating unruptured aneurysms with the PED.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective registry was established at 3 Australian neurointerventional units. Aneurysms were treated on the basis of unfavorable anatomy or recurrence following previous treatment. Aneurysms were treated with PED or PED and coils. Data including antiplatelet therapy, technical issues, complications, and imaging findings were recorded during at least a 6-month period.

RESULTS: A total of 57 aneurysms in 54 patients were treated by 5 neurointerventional radiologists. Forty-one aneurysms were asymptomatic, and 16 patients had mass-induced neurological deficit. Clinical follow-up was available in 57 aneurysms with imaging follow-up at 6 months in 56. Permanent morbidity and mortality in the series was 0% at 6 months. Four TIAs and 1 small retinal branch occlusion occurred, but no stroke. The demonstrated aneurysm occlusion rate at 1 month was 61.9%, and the overall occlusion rate at 6 months was 85.7%. In cases previously untreated, the 6-month occlusion was 92.5%. Three of 6 aneurysms with a previous stent in situ were occluded. Two patients (3.5%) had asymptomatic in-construct stenosis of >50%. Acute aneurysm-provoked mass effect resolved or improved significantly in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS: Use of the PED is safe and efficacious in difficult aneurysms with a high occlusion rate at 6 months, but lower occlusion rates were seen in a small population with previous stents in situ.

Abbreviations

PED
Pipeline Embolization Device
PITA
Pipeline for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms

The endovascular treatment of wide-neck aneurysms has been facilitated by the use of balloon remodelling and stent assistance, decreasing the recanalization rates that were seen with coiling alone.1–4 More recently, a number of flow-diverting devices have become available and are under evaluation.5–10 The PED (ev3, Irvine, California) is a self-expanding, microcatheter-delivered, 75% cobalt-nickel alloy, and 25% platinum mesh tube with 30%–35% metal surface coverage when fully deployed. Midterm results have been published recently in single-center registries11,12 and a multicenter international registry.13 All demonstrated that treatment of wide-neck aneurysms with PED reconstruction of the parent vessel was achieved safely. The purpose of this multicenter prospective registry was to analyze clinical experience as this flow diverter is released to the neurointerventional community and to assess whether the initial results can be generalized.

Materials and Methods

Patient Population

The study was a prospective case registry of all patients with lesions suitable for PED at 3 Australian neurointerventional centers between August 2009 and August 2010. Aneurysms with a wide neck (>4 mm), unfavorable dome/neck ratio (<1.6), a large (>10 mm), fusiform anatomy, and those that had failed previous therapy were selected. Each case was reviewed by a multidisciplinary team; before general release of the PED, individual application for use of the PED on compassionate grounds was sought from both hospital administration and the Therapeutic Goods and Services Administration. Written informed consent was obtained. Data were collected prospectively with respect to aneurysm morphology, symptoms, previous treatment, antiplatelet and anticoagulation regimens, and technical and clinical complications. Follow-up for at least 6 months evaluated occlusion, mass effect, delayed complications, ongoing antiplatelet therapy, and in-stent stenosis.

Antiplatelet and Anticoagulation Schedule

Antiplatelet protocols varied between operators. At 2 institutions, patients were pretreated with 75–150 mg daily of clopidogrel for 5 days. The latter dose has been shown to offer more reliable platelet inhibition.14 For at least 5 days before therapy, 100 mg (enteric coated) to 150 mg of daily aspirin was also given. If the mass effect symptoms were considered more urgent, patients were emergently loaded with clopidogrel (300–600 mg immediately) and 300 mg of aspirin before treatment. The higher 600-mg dose of clopidogrel is associated with more reliable levels of platelet inhibition.15 The other center chose to load patients with 300 mg of clopidogrel and 300 mg of aspirin for 2 days, based on previous coronary stent placement data.16 One center had access to a point-of-care platelet inhibition unit and could prescribe additional clopidogrel in patients with measured inadequate platelet inhibition.

Dual antiplatelet medication for 6 months was maintained in the anterior circulation in accordance with the largest published PED experience.17 Dual agents were maintained in the posterior circulation for 12 months because this is a novel treatment with little published data on the incidence of perforator occlusion currently available. Patients were monitored for clopidogrel compliance by direct questioning. Aspirin therapy was prescribed life-long. All patients had intravenous heparin intraprocedurally with an activated clotting time of >200. Fifty-six of 57 patients had heparin infusion for at least 24 hours postprocedure (activated partial thromboplastin time, ×2 normal).

Procedure

Therapy was undertaken with the patient under general anesthesia. All PEDs were deployed by using high-magnification subtraction fluoroscopy through a Marksman (ev3, Irvine, California) 2.8F microcatheter. Initial experience with deployment involved a combination of unsheathing the device and pushing it out of the microcatheter. Additional PEDs were deployed at the discretion of the operator. Indications for multiple PEDs included inadequate neck coverage, fusiform aneurysm configuration, and an ongoing jet into the aneurysm. Ideally, stasis and a contrast/blood layer were observed at the cessation of the procedure. In some cases, coils were placed as part of the procedure before PED deployment or after jailing a microcatheter.

Discharge and Follow-Up

Elective patients were admitted on the day of the procedure and discharged at 36–72 hours, with CTA or MRA, if possible, 1 month posttreatment. A 6-month control angiogram was obtained and reviewed by 2 interventional neuroradiologists. Further angiography was performed if the aneurysm was open or in-construct narrowing was present. In patients with mass effect, MR imaging or CT was also performed to assess interval change after treatment and, if possible, after clopidogrel cessation. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 6 months, in addition to independent evaluation by a neurologist or neurosurgeon. Patients were also seen more regularly if they had complex problems.

Study End Points

The primary end point was the angiographic appearance at 6 months with assessment of aneurysm closure and parent vessel stenosis. All clinical incidents (TIA, stroke, SAH, or mass effect) in the first 6 months posttreatment were documented. Secondary study end points included assessment of the influence of PED on symptomatic mass effect and aneurysm occlusion at 4 weeks by using MRA or CTA in as many patients as possible. A longitudinal study was undertaken beyond 6 months in patients with nonocclusion of the aneurysm (stopping clopidogrel at 6 months in the anterior circulation cases) or in-stent stenosis (maintaining clopidogrel).

Results

Patient and Aneurysm Characteristics

Data on 68 aneurysms in 65 patients were collected between August 2009 and August 2010. Eleven patients presenting with acute SAH were excluded and will be reported separately. This exclusion left 57 aneurysms in 54 patients for analysis. Forty-four women and 10 men (4.4:1) with a mean age of 55.7 years (median, 58 years; range, 30–83) and mean aneurysm size of 13.1 mm (median, 11 mm; range, 4–34 mm) were included. Seven were giant (>25 mm); 32, large (10–25 mm); and 18, small (<10 mm). All 57 aneurysms had a neck width of >4 mm or an unfavorable dome/neck ratio of <1.6. Forty-six were berry and 11 were fusiform. Forty-six aneurysms were in the anterior circulation, and 11 were in the posterior circulation. Aneurysm characteristics are described in Tables 1 and 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Size of aneurysm, number of PED, and use of coils

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Type, size, and occlusion rate of aneurysms

Forty-one aneurysms were asymptomatic, and 16 patients had symptomatic mass effect with neurologic deficits. Sixteen patients had had prior treatment: 15 endovascular and 1 clipping. Four previously treated patients presented with symptomatic mass effect.

Treatment and Procedural Outcomes

Ninety-eight PEDs were placed in 57 aneurysms (1.72 per aneurysm). The PED was used as the sole treatment in 36 of 41 elective asymptomatic cases. Coils were placed in 3 elective cases. This choice was operator-dependent and was performed in the following scenarios:

  • 1) A very wide-neck anterior communicating aneurysm in which the PED was protecting the A1/2 junction and narrowing, but not completely covering, the neck with secondary coiling via the opposite A1

  • 2) A carotico-ophthalmic aneurysm with the ophthalmic artery coming out of the body of the aneurysm in an attempt to protect the retinal artery from embolism

  • 3) A case converted to PED after initial partial coiling showed a neck wider than anticipated.

In the 16 cases with focal symptomatic mass effect, PED was used as the sole treatment in 13 cases with additional coils placed in 3 others due to the following:

  • 1) An acute carotid cavernous fistula due to guidewire perforation successfully acutely with PED and coil deployment without sequelae.

  • 2) A fusiform aneurysm in which the operator did not want to overlap the PED in the basilar trunk

  • 3) An operator-based decision in a cavernous aneurysm, previously treated with coils.

Acute Procedural Technical and Clinical Complications

A poorly opened PED requiring angioplasty occurred in 1 case in which the PED did not fully open within an Enterprise stent (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida) (Figure 1). Persistent filling of the aneurysm required balloon angioplasty at 11 months with progressive aneurysm thrombosis evident at 18 months.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A 30-year-old woman with a fusiform basilar trunk sidewall 12-mm aneurysm previously treated with an Enterprise stent some months before release of PED. A, Anteroposterior (AP) vertebrobasilar DSA demonstrates the stent (black arrowheads) within the patent aneurysm. B, High-resolution flat-panel CT scan after deployment of a single PED within the Enterprise stent demonstrates that the PED is not fully open and appears constrained within the stent (white arrow). C, AP DSA 6-months after PED insertion demonstrates some slowing of sac emptying but no change in aneurysm size. AP DSA at 11 months (not shown) was unchanged, and an angioplasty of the PED was performed by using a HyperGlide balloon (ev3), with mild improvement in appearance. The patient remained on clopidogrel. D, AP DSA, at 18 months' post-PED and 7 months' postangioplasty, demonstrates marked reduction in the size of the sac. The patient remains on clopidogrel.

An acute caroticocavernous fistula occurred in 1 patient during passage of a wire across a giant partly thrombosed cavernous aneurysm. The fistula was treated with coils and PED with no clinical consequence.

PED migration requiring additional treatment occurred in 2 cases. A 47-year-old man (Fig 2) had a 1-month post-PED implantation CTA demonstrating delayed proximal migration of the device, uncovering the aneurysm neck. Two additional PEDs were deployed the same day. Another patient had shortening of the distal PED, requiring placement of an Enterprise stent to anchor the PED.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A 55-year-old man with recent-onset homonymous hemianopia. A 16-mm superior hypophyseal aneurysm points upwards, compressing the chiasm. A, Lateral internal carotid artery DSA demonstrates the deployed PED well covering the aneurysm neck (black arrow). B, Sagittal CTA 48 hours after PED deployment demonstrates the distal margin of PED just covering the neck. C, Sagittal CTA at 1 month demonstrates proximal migration of the PED with a jet into the aneurysm. D, Sagittal CTA 1 month after the second PED demonstrates a good position of the PED and occlusion of the aneurysm, which was confirmed at 6-month DSA (not shown). Clopidogrel was stopped. The homonymous hemianopia resolved at 5 months, and 12-month MR imaging (not shown) demonstrated marked reduction in the size of the thrombosed aneurysm sac.

Retroperitoneal hemorrhage occurred in 1 patient, requiring cessation of heparin infusion at 8 hours and 2 hours of packed cells. This settled with no other intervention.

TIA, Stroke, and Death

There were no cases in which thrombus was detected during the case and no cases of stent thrombosis. No deaths, strokes, or delayed-aneurysm rupture occurred. One acute TIA at day 2 and 3 delayed TIAs (2 at 3 months and 1 at 5 months) were recorded. All settled with clopidogrel reloading. One case with a multilobular carotico-ophthalmic aneurysm had a retinal branch occlusion, with no clinical sequelae, after jailed coiling of the locule from which the ophthalmic artery arose.

Aneurysm Closure at Follow-Up

Fifty-six of 57 aneurysms were available for imaging follow-up at 6 months. One other patient, living in a remote location, had ongoing clinical follow-up, with a 1- and 14-month CTA demonstrating 50% and 100% occlusion, respectively, with no stenosis.

One-Month Imaging

CTA, MRA, and, in 1 patient, DSA were performed at 1 month posttreatment in 31 patients (Table 3). Occlusion rates of 61.3% in aneurysms with no prior treatment and 64.6% in previously treated cases were recorded.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Treatment devices and occlusion rates

Six-Month Imaging

DSA was performed in 54 patients with 2 having noninvasive CTA or MRA due to renal failure or advanced age. Occlusion rates are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. Forty-eight of the 56 aneurysms imaged were occluded at 6 months (85.7%). In patients not previously treated, the occlusion rate was 92.5%. In 16 patients with prior treatment of the target aneurysm, the occlusion rate was 68.7%. In 50 patients with no stent in situ, the occlusion rate was 90%. Only 3 of 6 cases with previous stent in situ were occluded. A total of 8 aneurysms studied at 6 months (14.3%) remained patent. All patients were on dual antiplatelet agents at that time. Clopidoprel has been stopped in all since then, with 2 further aneurysms occluding within 12 months.

In-Stent Stenosis

Two cases (3.5%) of in-stent stenosis of ≥50% were detected at 6 months. One (Fig 3) had long-segment intrastent 70% narrowing, decreasing to 30% at 12-month DSA. A second had 60% stenosis but had pre-existing mild narrowing of the parent vessel before PED. Both patients were ex-smokers, and 1 was noncompliant with clopidogrel. Both remain on dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 6 months, remaining asymptomatic.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 43-year-old woman, ex-smoker, with a 9-mm wide-neck superior hypophyseal aneurysm treated with a single PED. A, Lateral internal carotid artery DSA pre-PED. B, Lateral DSA 5 months after PED deployment demonstrates asymptomatic extensive long-segment in-stent stenosis. Clopidogrel and aspirin were continued. C, Lateral DSA 12 months after PED deployment shows marked improvement in the extent as well as the degree of narrowing (30%). Clopidogrel was ceased, but aspirin was to continue.

Mass Effect

Sixteen patients presented with focal neurologic deficit from aneurysmal compression, 15 acutely and 1 with long-standing homonymous hemianopia. Eight were given 48 hours of steroid cover post-PED, and 3 had temporary symptom worsening, which resolved completely with time and longer steroid cover. Ten cases resolved within 1 month, and an additional 3, in 1–6 months (Fig 4). Two had ongoing mild diplopia at 6 months but were markedly improved, with no change in the patient with long-standing homonymous hemianopia.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A 62-year-old woman who presented with 2 days of increasing dysarthria, tongue weakness, and mild quadriparesis. A, T2-weighted axial MR image demonstrates a 30-mm aneurysm compressing the medulla and the fourth ventricle. B, Lateral DSA of the vertebrobasilar system shows a fusiform aneurysm of the proximal basilar trunk, incorporating the vertebrobasilar junction and the distal left vertebral artery. Two 2.75 × 18 mm PEDs overlapping in the sac were deployed into the basilar artery and left vertebral artery. Coils were place in the distal right vertebral artery to stop an endoleak. The patient was placed on steroids but, 36 hours after treatment, had worsening of quadriparesis and developed bilateral ophthalmoplegia. MR imaging (not shown) did not completely demonstrate an infarct, and CTA (not shown) demonstrated occlusion of the aneurysm and patency of the PED. The patient was given an additional steroid bolus and recovered to normal health within 3 days. C, Six-month lateral left vertebral DSA demonstrates occlusion of the aneurysm with no stenosis. The coils in the right vertebral artery are visible as artifact. CT at 12 months (not shown) did not show a reduction in the size of the thrombosed aneurysm. Clopidogrel was ceased, and aspirin was continued. D, CTA at 18 months shows complete resorption of the aneurysm and absence of mass effect.

Discussion

Large (>10 mm) wide-neck (>4 mm) aneurysms or those with an unfavorable dome/neck ratio are more difficult to treat and more prone to recurrence following endovascular therapy.18–20 The development of flow diverters to reconstruct vessels and occlude aneurysms has created much interest,21–25 and recent single-center series11,12 and a multicenter13 registry show occlusion rates of 93%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, at 6-month follow-up. The PITA trial13 studied 31 aneurysms with no recent history of SAH; 71% were wide-neck (neck >4 mm or dome/neck ratio <1.5). Twelve (38.7%) had undergone previous endovascular treatment with coils or stent/coils. Dual antiplatelet therapy was maintained for a minimum of 30 days. Lylyk et al11 described a series of 63 aneurysms, without recent SAH; 67% were wide-neck (dome/neck ratio <2) or large, with 23 (37%) lesions previously treated. Dual antiplatelet medication was maintained for 6 months. Only 4 (6%) patients in the study of Lylyk et al11 were treated with PED and coils, whereas 16 (51.6%) were treated thus in the PITA trial.13 Our study population of 57 aneurysms all had morphology considered difficult to treat or with a greater likelihood of recurrence (neck >4 mm and/or dome/neck ratio <1.6).26,27 The size of our aneurysms (mean = 13.1 mm) also indicates a greater tendency to recurrence with conventional endovascular techniques.4,20

The overall 6-month occlusion rate of 85.7% was lower in our series compared with other series.11,13 In cases not previously treated, the occlusion rate was 92.5%, in line with previous results. All giant aneurysms were occluded. Eighty-nine percent of berry and 63.6% with fusiform morphology were occluded at 6 months. In cases treated with no stent in situ, the occlusion rate at 6 months for this series was 90% (45/50) and at 14 months was 94.1% (48/51). These results compare with balloon remodelling 77%–85% 27,28 or stent-assisted techniques,46%–74%.26,29 The presence of a stent in the vessel results in a lower rate of occlusion, 50% in our small cohort of 6.

Our incidence of peri- and postprocedural complications resulting in permanent morbimortality was 0% in 57 cases of asymptomatic aneurysms or those with mass effect. This compares favorably with balloon-assisted coiling morbimortality of 3.75%–14.1%.30,31 There were no delayed ruptures in this cohort. Rates of immediate procedural-related thromboembolic stroke of 0%11 and 3.2%13 are also reported in other PED series. This low published incidence should be compared with 2 reports on another flow diverter, Silk (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France), in which 4/13 cases had symptomatic thromboembolic complications directly associated with the procedure.32 A second article10 reported 15.4% (4/26) stroke and 4% (1/26) mortality with a 33% in-stent stenosis rate in a series of 26 patients in which the Silk flow diverter (Balt Extrusion) was successfully implanted in nonruptured aneurysms. No intraprocedural thrombus or stent occlusion occurred in our series or that of Lylyk et al,17 totalling 110 cases. Byrne et al6 reported an 11% incidence of parent vessel thrombosis following Silk implantation in a series of 70 cases.

The literature has recently highlighted delayed rupture related to flow diverters in elective cases.32,33 Kulcsar et al32 documented 13 patients with delayed rupture following Silk use, of which 2 may have had SAH. Rupture was defined as early (2–48 days) in 10 patients or late (3–5 months) in 3 patients who were no longer on dual antiplatelet therapy. Eleven patients had an inflow jet after flow-diverter insertion. In all cases, it is our policy to insert the PED until any discernible inflow jet is eliminated, if practicable. Cebral et al33 documented 3 cases of rupture following PED placement, all occurring within 1 week of the procedure; 2 of these had stenosis related to the parent vessel. Cebral et al highlighted the possible role of parent vessel stenosis in aneurysm rupture post-PED, suggesting that coiling of these aneurysms may also be required in that setting.

The possibility of delayed rupture,32,33 combined with animal models demonstrating poor intraluminal organization of thrombus at 3–6 months, despite cessation of dual antiplatlet cover at 1 month,24,25 would favor a shorter period of clopidogrel, perhaps 1–2 months. This recommendation needs to be balanced against the risk of delayed stroke, though low, with 5.3% having delayed TIA at 2- to 5-months after implantation. If possible, we maintain dual antiplatelet cover for 12 months in implanted PEDs in the posterior circulation, because the treatment is novel at this time and the sequelae of posterior perforator stroke are significant. However, we have 2 patients who stopped clopidogrel, at 1 week and 3 months, with no clinical sequelae or stenosis. A case of delayed PED thrombosis was reported in the basilar artery at 2 years.34

The rate of in-stent stenosis was low in our series. This has been observed in animal models24,25 and in human series11,13 showing a 0%–4.8% moderate or severe rate of asymptomatic stenosis with clopidogrel maintenance of 1 and 6 months respectively. The degree of narrowing anecdotally diminishes with time when comparing 3- and 6-month angiograms. We had 1 patient in whom this was demonstrated. Acute mass effect at presentation was documented in 16 patients, with 3 having transient deterioration after PED deployment. None had permanent sequelae and responded with time and ongoing corticosteroids. No uniform policy is followed with respect to administration of steroids in large aneurysms, but patients must be observed for deterioration and ischemia must be ruled out by clinical evaluation and MR imaging, if necessary. In the 15 patients presenting with acute mass effect, symptoms resolved (n = 13) or markedly improved (n = 2) following PED implantation.

Deployment of the PED results in shortening of up to 50%–60%, depending on the size of the PED relative to the vessel and any discrepancy in proximal and distal vessel size. The device will tend to seek a larger lumen (“melon-seeding”), migrating proximally, if not well-expanded and anchored distally. As operator experience increased, the deployment technique changed, with more emphasis on distal vessel purchase and forward PED deployment, rather than unsheathing the device. In addition, axial reloading of the delivery catheter in the cavernous ICA is useful before the final portion of the PED is released. Nudging the proximal margin of the PED with the delivery catheter after deployment promotes proximal shortening of the PED. Anecdotally we believe this lessens potential shortening from the distal end, preventing proximal migration.

Conclusions

PED reconstruction of aneurysms with wide necks, unfavorable dome/neck ratio, and large size is safe, with high occlusion rates at 6 months and a low incidence of in-construct narrowing. The technique can be used in a wide variety of patients, and those with acute mass effect reliably responded to PED implantation. Adjunctive density coiling may be warranted in high-risk situations, such as stenosis in the parent vessel, by using the PED as a coil scaffold support rather than a flow diverter in selected suitable cases.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Hal Rice, Research Support (including provision of equipment or materials): ev3, Details: educational support for scientific meeting attendance, and scientific meeting sponsorship; Consultant: ev3, Details: ev3 proctor in Australia, New Zealand, and Asia Pacific region. Jason Wenderoth, Consultant: ev3, Details: I have twice been engaged by ev3 to proctor new users of the PED at US $1500 each.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Raymond J,
    2. Guilbert F,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al
    . Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398–403
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Weill A,
    3. Castaings L,
    4. et al
    . Intracranial berry aneurysms: angiographic and clinical results after endovascular treatment. Radiology 1998;206:499–510
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cognard C,
    2. Weill A,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. et al
    . Long-term angiographic follow-up of 169 intracranial berry aneurysms occluded with detachable coils. Radiology 1999;212:348–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Henkes H,
    2. Fischer S,
    3. Liebig T,
    4. et al
    . Repeated endovascular coil occlusion in 350 of 2759 intracranial aneurysms: safety and effectiveness aspects. Neurosurgery 2006;58:224–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Kelly ME,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al
    . Curative reconstruction of a giant midbasilar trunk aneurysm with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2009;64:212–17, discussion 217
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Byrne JV,
    2. Beltechi R,
    3. Yarnold JA,
    4. et al
    . Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 2010;5:pii:e12492
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Albuquerque F,
    3. Gonzalez F,
    4. et al
    . Reconstruction of the right anterior circulation with the Pipeline embolization device to achieve treatment of a progressively symptomatic, large carotid aneurysm. J NeuroInterv Surg 2010;2:31–37
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kamran M,
    2. Yarnold J,
    3. Grunwald IQ,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema. Neuroradiology 2010;53:501–08. Epub 2010 Sep 14
    PubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Ernemann U,
    3. Wetzel SG,
    4. et al
    . High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 2010;41:1690–96
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Collignon L,
    3. Raphaeli G,
    4. et al
    . Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 2010;41:2247–53
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Miranda C,
    3. Ceratto R,
    4. et al
    . Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 2009;64:632–42, discussion 642–43, quiz N636
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Szikora I,
    2. Berentei Z,
    3. Kulcsar Z,
    4. et al
    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Lylyk P,
    3. Szikora I,
    4. et al
    . The Pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;32:34–40. Epub 2010 Dec 9
    PubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Gladding P,
    2. Webster M,
    3. Zeng I,
    4. et al
    . The antiplatelet effect of higher loading and maintenance dose regimens of clopidogrel: the PRINC (Plavix Response in Coronary Intervention) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008;1:612–19
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gurbel PA,
    2. Bliden KP,
    3. Hayes KM,
    4. et al
    . The relation of dosing to clopidogrel responsiveness and the incidence of high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1392–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Bertrand ME,
    2. Rupprecht HJ,
    3. Urban P,
    4. et al
    . Double-blind study of the safety of clopidogrel with and without a loading dose in combination with aspirin compared with ticlopidine in combination with aspirin after coronary stenting: the clopidogrel aspirin stent international cooperative study (CLASSICS). Circulation 2000;102:624–29
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lylyk P,
    2. Ferrario A,
    3. Pasbon B,
    4. et al
    . Buenos Aires experience with the Neuroform self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;102:235–41
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Jahromi BS,
    2. Mocco J,
    3. Bang JA,
    4. et al
    . Clinical and angiographic outcome after endovascular management of giant intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;63:662–74, discussion 674–75
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fernandez Zubillaga A,
    2. Guglielmi G,
    3. Vinuela F,
    4. et al
    . Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815–20
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ries T,
    2. Siemonsen S,
    3. Thomalla G,
    4. et al
    . Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755–61
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Woo HH,
    3. Albuquerque FC,
    4. et al
    . Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 2008;62:1115–20, discussion 1120–21
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wanke I,
    2. Forsting M
    . Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection. Neuroradiology 2008;50:991–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Augsburger L,
    2. Farhat M,
    3. Reymond P,
    4. et al
    . Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol 2009;19:204–14. Epub 2009 Aug 23
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al
    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. et al
    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Yavuz K,
    2. Geyik S,
    3. Saatci I,
    4. et al
    . WingSpan stent system in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: clinical experience with midterm follow-up results. J Neurosurg 2008;109:445–53
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Nelson PK,
    2. Levy DI
    . Balloon-assisted coil embolization of wide-necked aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: medium-term angiographic and clinical follow-up in 22 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:19–26
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Moret J,
    2. Cognard C,
    3. Weill A,
    4. et al
    . Reconstruction technic in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: long-term angiographic and clinical results—apropos of 56 cases [in French]. J Neuroradiol 1997;24:30–44
    PubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Weber W,
    2. Bendszus M,
    3. Kis B,
    4. et al
    . A new self-expanding nitinol stent (Enterprise) for the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial clinical and angiographic results in 31 aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2007;49:555–61
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Lefranc F,
    3. Bruneau M,
    4. et al
    . Balloon-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms is not associated with a higher complication rate. Neuroradiology 2008;50:769–76
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sluzewski M,
    2. van Rooij WJ,
    3. Beute GN,
    4. et al
    . Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: incidence, complications, and angiography results. J Neurosurg 2006;105:396–99
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kulcsar Z,
    2. Houdart E,
    3. Bonafe A,
    4. et al
    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;32:20–25
    PubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Cebral JR,
    2. Mut F,
    3. Raschi M,
    4. et al
    . Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:27–33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Fiorella D,
    2. Hsu D,
    3. Woo HH,
    4. et al
    . Very late thrombosis of a Pipeline embolization device construct: case report. Neurosurgery 2010;67:onsE313–314, discussion onsE314
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received February 28, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision May 16, 2011.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (1)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 1
1 Jan 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Immediate and Midterm Results following Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Immediate and Midterm Results following Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device
W. McAuliffe, V. Wycoco, H. Rice, C. Phatouros, T.J. Singh, J. Wenderoth
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2012, 33 (1) 164-170; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2727

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Immediate and Midterm Results following Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device
W. McAuliffe, V. Wycoco, H. Rice, C. Phatouros, T.J. Singh, J. Wenderoth
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2012, 33 (1) 164-170; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2727
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Safety and efficacy of the Derivo Embolization Device for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicentric study
  • Parent Artery Reconstruction for Large or Giant Cerebral Aneurysms Using the Tubridge Flow Diverter: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial (PARAT)
  • Ultrasound for the evaluation of stenosis after flow diversion
  • A comparison between the new Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Blue) stent and the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) in bench-top and cadaver studies
  • Use of the Pipeline embolization device for recurrent and residual cerebral aneurysms: a safety and efficacy analysis with short-term follow-up
  • An outcomes-based grading scale for the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion
  • Haemodynamic analysis for recanalisation of intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment: an observational registry study in China
  • FRED Flow Diverter: A Study on Safety and Efficacy in a Consecutive Group of 50 Patients
  • Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry
  • Current Trends and Results of Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms at a Single Institution in the Flow-Diverter Era
  • SILK flow diverter for complex intracranial aneurysms: a Canadian registry
  • Intravenous C-Arm Conebeam CT Angiography following Long-Term Flow-Diverter Implantation: Technologic Evaluation and Preliminary Results
  • Flow Diverter Therapy With the Pipeline Embolization Device Is Associated With an Elevated Rate of Delayed Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Lesions
  • Intra-aneurysmal flow rates are reduced by two flow diverters: an experiment using tomographic particle image velocimetry in an aneurysm model
  • Utilization of Pipeline embolization device for treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: US multicenter experience
  • Long-Term Follow-Up Results following Elective Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device
  • Primary endovascular treatment of post-irradiated carotid pseudoaneurysm at the skull base with the Pipeline embolization device
  • Transvenous approach for the treatment of direct carotid cavernous fistula following Pipeline embolization of cavernous carotid aneurysm: a report of two cases and review of the literature
  • The FRED Flow-Diverter Stent for Intracranial Aneurysms: Clinical Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy
  • International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A Multicenter Aneurysm Treatment Study
  • Surpass Flow Diverter in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Prospective Multicenter Study
  • Cavernous Carotid Aneurysms in the Era of Flow Diversion: A Need to Revisit Treatment Paradigms
  • A Novel Flow-Diverting Device (Tubridge) for the Treatment of 28 Large or Giant Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience
  • Endovascular treatment of fusiform intracranial vertebral artery aneurysms using reconstructive techniques
  • Platelet function inhibitors and platelet function testing in neurointerventional procedures
  • Effect of Structural Remodeling (Retraction and Recoil) of the Pipeline Embolization Device on Aneurysm Occlusion Rate
  • A Single Pipeline Embolization Device is Sufficient for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Transvenous approach for the treatment of direct carotid cavernous fistula following Pipeline embolization of cavernous carotid aneurysm: a report of two cases and review of the literature
  • Use of Flow-Diverting Devices in Fusiform Vertebrobasilar Giant Aneurysms: A Report on Periprocedural Course and Long-Term Follow-Up
  • Last-Recorded P2Y12 Reaction Units Value Is Strongly Associated with Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Complications Occurring Up to 6 Months after Treatment in Patients with Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device
  • Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device
  • Cerebral Aneurysms Treated with Flow-Diverting Stents: Computational Models with Intravascular Blood Flow Measurements
  • Incidence of Microemboli and Correlation with Platelet Inhibition in Aneurysmal Flow Diversion
  • Spontaneous Delayed Migration/Shortening of the Pipeline Embolization Device: Report of 5 Cases
  • Flow diversion to treat aneurysms: the free segment of stent
  • Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience
  • Stent usage in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: past, present and future
  • What's Coming Down the Pipe--And Should We Be Excited, Concerned, or Both?
  • Canadian Experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device for Repair of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow Diverters: A Meta-Analysis
  • Pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction units value predicts perioperative thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device
  • Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Flow-Diverter Embolization Device: A Single-Center Experience with Long-Term Follow-Up Results
  • Safety of the Pipeline Embolization Device in Treatment of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Performance of High-Resolution Vessel Wall MR Imaging Combined with TOF-MRA in the Follow-up of Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment
  • Outcomes with Endovascular Treatment of Patients with M2 Segment MCA Occlusion in the Late Time Window
  • Direct Aspiration versus Combined Technique for Distal Medium-Vessel Occlusions: Comparison on a Human Placenta Model
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire