Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticlePediatrics

Craniofacial Abnormalities in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome

N.J. Ullrich, V.M. Silvera, S.E. Campbell and L.B. Gordon
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2012, 33 (8) 1512-1518; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3088
N.J. Ullrich
aFrom the Departments of Neurology (N.J.U.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V.M. Silvera
bRadiology (V.M.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.E. Campbell
dCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research (S.E.C., L.B.G.), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.B. Gordon
cAnesthesia (L.B.G.), Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
dCenter for Gerontology and Healthcare Research (S.E.C., L.B.G.), Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
eDepartment of Pediatrics (L.B.G.), Hasbro Children's Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: HGPS is a rare syndrome of segmental premature aging. Our goal was to expand the scope of structural bone and soft-tissue craniofacial abnormalities in HGPS through CT or MR imaging. Using The Progeria Research Foundation Medical and Research Database, 98 imaging studies on 25 patients, birth to 14.1 years of age, were comprehensively reviewed. Eight newly identified abnormalities involving the calvaria, skull base, and soft tissues of the face and orbits were present with prevalences between 43% and 100%. These included J-shaped sellas, a mottled appearance and increased vascular markings of the calvaria, abnormally configured mandibular condyles, hypoplastic articular eminences, small zygomatic arches, prominent parotid glands, and optic nerve kinking. This expanded craniofacial characterization helps link disease features and improves our ability to evaluate how underlying genetic and cellular abnormalities culminate in a disease phenotype.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CDC
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HGPS
Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome
OFC
occipitofrontal circumference
TMJ
temporomandibular joint
WHO
World Health Organization

HGPS is a rare syndrome of segmental premature aging.1 HGPS results from a sporadic autosomal dominant mutation of the LMNA gene, which encodes for the inner nuclear membrane protein lamin A.2,3 Progerin, the disease-causing aberrant lamin A protein, causes alterations in the nuclear structure,4 cellular life span,5 and transcription.6 Progerin is expressed in all differentiated cells, supporting a multisystem disease phenotype in HGPS.7

Children with HGPS typically appear healthy at birth and within the first year of life develop severe failure to thrive with sclerodermatous skin changes.8,9 Classic craniofacial features develop with age and underlying disease culminates in death from myocardial infarction or stroke at an average age of 13 years.8,10

Close examination of common and disparate findings in HGPS and aging may inform both fields of study. Clinical features that resemble premature aging include alopecia, joint contractures, progressive mandibular resorption, low bone density, lipoatrophy with limb wasting, and global atherosclerosis.8,11 Age-related conditions such as Alzheimer disease, dementia, osteoarthritis, and cancer are absent. Cognitive function and motor development are normal. In addition, there is growth failure, skeletal dysplasia, and lack of pubertal development.12

Prior reports of craniofacial features are based on plain film findings and autopsy results.10,13,14 In this study of a large cohort of patients with HGPS, we reviewed CT, MR imaging, and radiographs to quantify previously noted and new craniofacial imaging features to expand our understanding of the natural history of the disease.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Data

Patients were identified from The Progeria Research Foundation Medical and Research Database (Brown University Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Providence, Rhode Island). Eligible individuals had a genetic and/or clinical diagnosis of HGPS and at least 1 MR or CT of the head or neck available for review. The diagnosis of HGPS was genetically determined by either the classic exon 11 (c. 1824 C>T) or a nonclassic progerin-producing LMNA mutation within exon 11 or the exon/intron border, plus the typical clinical phenotype.15

Data abstraction included indications for neuroimaging studies, OFC, and medications. Height-age was determined by using the CDC and WHO child growth standards for boys and girls.16,17 Abstracted OFC measurements from patient charts were expressed as percentiles by height-age.

Neuroimaging Studies

A neuroradiologist (V.M.S.) and a neurologist (N.J.U.) interpreted all neuroimaging studies, including MR; CT; and radiographs of the face, neck, and skull, together in consensus-reading sessions. All imaging studies were reviewed twice. The purpose of the first review was to catalog known and novel bony and soft-tissue craniofacial features by using visual/subjective assessment. The purpose of the second review was to establish the presence or absence of each individual imaging feature. Only the second review was used to determine prevalence.

This retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act–compliant study was approved by the institutional review boards of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital with informed consent from parents or legal guardians.

Results

Demographic Features

Patient characteristics and types of neuroimaging studies assessed are presented in Table 1. Twenty-five children provided a total of 98 neuroimaging studies from birth to 14.1 years of age (mean, 6.5 years). There were 11 females and 14 males. Eighteen children were diagnosed with classic HGPS, 3 patients had the nonclassic phenotype and nonclassic progerin-producing mutations based on confirmed LMNA mutational analysis, and 4 patients were diagnosed on the basis of phenotypic disease expression.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patient characteristics

Neuroimaging Results

The most frequent indications for imaging were evaluation of acute neurologic symptoms and/or diagnostic evaluation or follow-up of a prior imaging finding (Table 2). Twenty disease-related abnormalities were detected, including previously described craniofacial features (Fig 1) and 8 newly identified features. Disease-related features were categorized into abnormalities of the scalp, calvaria and skull base, facial bone, soft tissue, and orbits (Table 3). Frequency is expressed as the number of patients with a positive finding relative to the number of patients in whom imaging allowed adequate assessment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Indications for imaging

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Anterior (A) and lateral (B) projection of a 3D CT shaded-surface display of the head demonstrates craniofacial disproportion, prominent eyes, hypotelorism, narrow nasal bridge with broad tipped nose, small face and mandible, lack of facial fat, and prominent veins in a 9-year-old child with HGPS compared with an age-matched control (C and D).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Anatomic abnormalities of head and neck in HGPS

Scalp, Calvarial, and Skull Base Features

Thinning of the calvarium was seen in 20/21 (95%) individuals and was accompanied by a paucity of scalp fat in 21/23 (91%) (Fig 2). A mottled appearance of the skull was seen in 10/17 (59%) patients (Fig 3), most commonly in the frontal, parietal, and sphenoid regions. No overt bony destruction or osteolysis of the calvaria was seen. Two individuals had skull fractures. Prominent vascular markings of the bony calvaria were observed in 9/10 (90%) (mean age, 6.8 years; range, 0–13.1 years) (Fig 3), including 3 children younger than 1 year of age.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Sagittal CT reformatted image of a 9-year-old child with HGPS (A) demonstrates a thin calvarium, paucity of scalp fat, a J-shaped sella (single arrow), and a patent anterior fontanel (double arrow) compared with the control (B).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A 10-year-old child with HGPS. Axial CT image reveals a mottled appearance of the calvarium (A) and prominent vascular markings (arrow, B).

In 96% of normally developing children, closure of the anterior and posterior fontanels occurs by 2 years and 2 months of age, respectively.18,19 If one excludes children younger than 2 years of age, the anterior fontanel remained patent in 9/16 (56%) (range, 2.1–12.1 years; mean, 7.4 years) (Fig 2). Adequate visualization of the posterior fontanels was limited but was clearly open in 3 children, 2.1, 3.5, and 9.4 years of age. Widened sagittal, squamous, and lambdoid sutures were observed in 7/17 (41%) children (Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

A 2-year-old child with a persistent patent posterior fontanel (arrow, A) on axial CT and a widened sagittal suture (arrow, B) on the anteroposterior radiograph of the skull.

A large cranium relative to the facial size was seen in 23/25 (92%) (Fig 1). Average patient length/height for age was well below the third percentile, and average patient length/height for age was 50% of chronologic age. By contrast, the mean head circumference normalized to height-age was at the 56th percentile (n = 254 observations from all 25 children, range fifth to 97th percentile).

A J-shaped sella was observed in 17/19 (89%) children (Fig 5).

Fig 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 5.

Sagittal T1-weighted MR image shows a J-shaped sella.

Oral Maxillary, Zygomatic Arch, and Parotid Gland Features

A short mandibular ramus was seen in 15/18 (83%) patients, with a gracile thin zygomatic arch in 6/12 (50%) (Fig 6). A shallow glenoid fossa with a hypoplastic or absent articular eminence and flattening of the mandibular condyle were seen in 6/14 (43%) (Fig 7). A V-shaped palate was seen in 9/20 (45%) children, and a disorganized dentition was seen in 10/20 (50%) (Fig 8).

Fig 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 6.

Lateral projection of a 3D CT shaded-surface display reveals a short mandibular ramus, a steep mandibular angle with disorganized dentition (A), and a thin gracile zygomatic arch in a child with HGPS (B) compared with a healthy age-matched control (insets).

Fig 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 7.

A, Lateral CT reformatted image demonstrates flattening of the condylar head, a shallow glenoid fossa, and a hypoplastic articular eminence. B, Coronal CT reformatted image of a child with HGPS shows a flattened condylar head and a shallow glenoid fossa.

Fig 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 8.

Axial T2-weighted MR imaging demonstrates a V-shaped palate, disorganized dentition, and prominent parotid glands in child with HGPS (A) compared with the control (B).

Prominence of the parotid glands was seen in 13/13 (100%) children (Fig 8). No intrinsic abnormality of the parotid gland was observed.

Orbital Features

Hypotelorism was noted in 19/22 (86%) children (Fig 9). Kinking of the optic nerves was seen in 17/19 (89%) (Fig 10). We did not detect any patients with exophthalmos, exorbitism, or overabundance of retrobulbar fat on imaging. No abnormality was seen in the extraocular muscles or globes.

Fig 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 9.

Anterior projection of a 3D CT shaded surface display of the head in a child with HGPS (A) shows hypotelorism, small mid- and lower face, and a disorganized dentition compared with the control (B).

Fig 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 10.

Sagittal T1-weighted MR image demonstrates kinking of the optic nerve (arrow).

Discussion

We established a prevalence for 20 different disease-related head and neck abnormalities in this cohort; of these, 8 have not been previously reported, to our knowledge. The morphologic spectrum of craniofacial features in HGPS is considerably expanded. Both new and previously identified features occurred with high frequency (41%–100%), which reinforces the consistency of pathobiology among patients.

Calvarial and Skull Base Changes

We observed bony abnormalities of the calvarium and skull base, including thinning and mottling of the calvarium, prominent vascular markings, delayed closure of the anterior and posterior fontanels, widening of calvarial sutures, and a J-shaped sella.

We did not observe bony destruction of either the calvaria or skull base to suggest the presence of osteolysis, a feature frequently observed in the clavicle, digits, and ribs. However, we noted mottling of the flat bones of the skull and postulate that this finding may represent bony demineralization, similar to the juxta-articular demineralization seen on radiographs.10,14 The osteopenia of long bones is accompanied by abnormalities in structural rigidity and is thought to represent a skeletal dysplasia, rather than the typical osteoporosis of aging.12,20,21

Delayed closure of the anterior and posterior fontanels and widening of the calvarial sutures in HGPS have been reported.8 In our cohort, patients as old as 9 years exhibited persistently patent anterior and posterior fontanels. Widened calvarial sutures were also common. Bone growth at the calvarial sutures and fontanels occurs via intramembranous bone deposition at suture edges.22 Widened sutures and patent fontanels reflect a disturbance in the synchronized process of osteoblastic bone apposition and osteoclastic bone resorption in coordination with the growth of the underlying brain.23

We frequently observed a thin calvarium, which has been noted on autopsy specimens.9,10 The thinness of the skull bone may reflect delayed evolution of the normal bony remodeling of the skull to its mature organization, similar to stunted linear skeletal growth observed elsewhere. The normal infant skull thickens with age, transitioning from a unilaminar to a trilaminar composition. In the developing calvarium, appositional bone growth increases bone thickness.23 Disturbed appositional bone growth in HGPS has been suggested by the observation of laminations beneath the periosteum of long bones on radiographs.13

A predisposition toward skull fractures has been reported in HGPS.8 In our series, 2 children with skull fractures following trauma were noted. Fracture may result from the relative thinness of the calvarial bone in combination with osteopenia.

Prominent vascular markings of the calvaria were frequently observed, even in very young children. Generally, diploic veins are not visible before the third year of life and are not fully developed until 15 years of age. Meningeal vascular grooves along the inner table are not typically visualized until 12 years.24 The appearance of prominent vascular markings reflects either enlargement of nutrient canals within the diploic space or increased prominence of the vascular grooves along the inner table or both. Prominent diploic veins of the skull are frequently seen in the elderly. When decalcification or osteoporosis of the calvarium occurs, the vascular markings of the diploe stand out more prominently and the vascular grooves along the inner table appear more distinct.25 Therefore, calvarial demineralization may contribute to the aforementioned appearance as well. The prominent scalp veins seen clinically do not account for the bony remodeling because they are not pulsatile and are not bound by the periosteum along the outer table.

We frequently observed a J-shaped sella, which is an abnormal configuration of the sella turcica due to an exaggeration of the normal chiasmatic sulcus. This finding can be seen in genetic disorders, as an anatomic variant,26 and secondary to pathologic states such as chronic hydrocephalus. Most interesting, the only 2 patients in our series who did not have J-shaped sellas were also the only patients treated with recombinant growth hormone.

The appearance of macrocrania and craniofacial disproportion is a common clinical feature in HGPS. In our cohort, OFC measurements adjusted by height-age were normal; thus, it is likely due to the progressive remodeling of the facial bones rather than the presence of true macrocephaly.

Orbits

Clinically, children with HGPS have prominent eyes. Exophthalmos is not observed clinically and was not seen on imaging. We frequently observed optic nerve kinking and hypotelorism. Remodeling of the facial bones may result in a progressive foreshortening of the distance between the optic chiasm and the bony orbit, leading to optic nerve redundancy, further compounded by hypotelorism.

Mandible, Maxilla, TMJ, Zygomatic Arches, and Parotid Glands

Our findings confirm and expand on the factors affecting oral maxillary function.11,27 We observed temporomandibular abnormalities and thin gracile zygomatic arches, which have not been previously reported. A mixed dentition of the teeth of the mandible and maxilla has been described, giving rise to a “double row” appearance12 and reflects our common observation of a V-shaped palate and a disorganized dentition.

A small mandible-to-maxilla ratio with hypognathia was observed. Hypoplastic mandibles have been described, more prominently affecting the mandibular rami, steep mandibular angles, aberrantly positioned condylar processes, and loss of basal bone height.27 We identified short mandibular rami in combination with flattened mandibular condyles, shallow glenoid fossae, and hypoplastic or absent articular eminences. The flattened appearance of the condylar head bears a similarity to the abnormal remodeled metaphyses seen elsewhere in the appendicular skeleton in HGPS.9,12 Avascular necrosis, which is commonly observed in the femoral head in these children, could result in a flattened appearance of the mandibular condyle; however, the absence of jaw pain clinically makes this possibility less likely.

Most children with HGPS have a limited oral opening on clinical examination, and the aforementioned findings introduce possible etiologies. The limited oral opening may be due to a limited range of motion of the TMJ secondary to the abnormally configured mandibular condyle, glenoid fossa, and articular eminence. Periarticular fibrosis may be present, similar to the periarticular fibrosis seen elsewhere within the skeleton.11,28 Mandibular ankylosis is often noted in other syndromes associated with congenital and nonsyndromic mandbular hypoplasia.29 A foreshortened mandibular ramus will produce a smaller oral opening for any degree of rotation of the mandibular condyle within the glenoid fossa due to a smaller rotational arc. These factors may also contribute to the maintenance of vertical chewing seen in children with HGPS, who do not evolve to rotatory chewing, typical of normally developing children.11 Dedicated TMJ imaging could help elucidate these issues.

A “jowly” appearance of the face is often noted in HGPS. This is thought to be due to a relative loss of facial fat out of proportion to loss of buccal fat. Buccal fat, along with pubic fat, disappears relatively late in the course of the disease.8 We frequently observed prominent parotid glands, which could also account for the “jowly” appearance. It is unclear whether the prominence of the parotid glands is a result of true glandular hypertrophy or results from the progressively smaller relative dimensions of the facial bones along with decreasing facial fat.

Conclusions

This study constitutes the largest imaging review of craniofacial features in patients with HGPS, to our knowledge. We quantified many previously recognized craniofacial findings of HGPS and identified 8 new common features. We expanded the knowledge of the spectrum and prevalence of craniofacial features in HGPS and suggested potential etiologies and anatomic explanations for clinical issues of the head and neck. Slowing or arrest of these changes may provide new clinical-outcome parameters to follow progression, improvement, or delayed onset of findings with treatment interventions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Nalton Ferraro, MD, DMD, for his input on oral maxillofacial and mandibular function.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Leslie B. Gordon—RELATED: Grants: Rhode Island Hospital,* Brown University,* Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: The Progeria Research Foundation;* UNRELATED: Provision of Writing Assistance, Medicines, Equipment, or Administrative Support: Merck/Schering Plough Research Institute,* Comments: provide pharmacokinetics and trial medications at no cost. Patents: 2 patents pertaining to progeria (neither are paying entities), Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: The Progeria Research Foundation,* Other: volunteer medical director for the funding agency,* OTHER RELATIONSHIPS: Parent of a child with progeria. *Money paid to the institution.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kieran MW,
    2. Gordon L,
    3. Kleinman M
    . New approaches to progeria. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 834– 41
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. De Sandre-Giovannoli A,
    2. Bernard R,
    3. Cau P,
    4. et al
    . Lamin a truncation in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria. Science 2003; 300: 2055
  3. 3.↵
    1. Eriksson M,
    2. Brown WT,
    3. Gordon LB,
    4. et al
    . Recurrent de novo point mutations in lamin A cause Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature 2003; 423: 293– 98
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Goldman RD,
    2. Shumaker DK,
    3. Erdos MR,
    4. et al
    . Accumulation of mutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 8963– 68
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bridger JM,
    2. Kill IR
    . Aging of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome fibroblasts is characterised by hyperproliferation and increased apoptosis. Exp Gerontol 2004; 39: 717– 24
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Csoka AB,
    2. English SB,
    3. Simkevich CP,
    4. et al
    . Genome-scale expression profiling of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome reveals widespread transcriptional misregulation leading to mesodermal/mesenchymal defects and accelerated atherosclerosis. Aging Cell 2004; 3: 235– 43
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gruenbaum Y,
    2. Goldman RD,
    3. Meyuhas R,
    4. et al
    . The nuclear lamina and its functions in the nucleus. Int Rev Cytol 2003; 226: 1– 62
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Hennekam RC
    . Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: review of the phenotype. Am J Med Genet 2006; 140: 2603– 24
    PubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. DeBusk FL
    . The Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Report of 4 cases and review of the literature. J Pediatr 1972; 80: 697– 724
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gabr M,
    2. Hashem N,
    3. Hashem M,
    4. et al
    . Progeria, a pathologic study. J Pediatr 1960; 57: 70– 77
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Merideth MA,
    2. Gordon LB,
    3. Clauss S,
    4. et al
    . Phenotype and course of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 592– 604
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gordon LB,
    2. McCarten KM,
    3. Giobbie-Hurder A,
    4. et al
    . Disease progression in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: impact on growth and development. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 824– 33
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Reichel W,
    2. Bailey JA 2nd.,
    3. Zigel S,
    4. et al
    . Radiological findings in progeria. J Am Geriatr Soc 1971; 19: 657– 74
    PubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Shozawa T,
    2. Sageshima M,
    3. Okada E
    . Progeria with cardiac hypertrophy and review of 12 autopsy cases in the literature. Acta Pathol Jpn 1984; 34: 797– 811
    PubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Gordon LB,
    2. Brown WT,
    3. Collins FS
    . Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle: University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2003 Dec 12 [updated 2011 Jan 06]
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kuczmarski RJ,
    2. Ogden CL,
    3. Grummer-Strawn LM,
    4. et al
    . CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data 2000: 1– 27
  17. 17.↵
    WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006; 450: 76– 85
    PubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kiesler J,
    2. Ricer R
    . The abnormal fontanel. Am Fam Physician 2003; 67: 2547– 52
    PubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Behrman RE,
    2. Kliegman RM,
    3. Arvin AM,
    4. Nelso WE
    1. Haslam R
    . Neurologic evaluation. In: Behrman RE, Kliegman RM, Arvin AM, Nelso WE eds. Nelson Essentials of Pediatrics. 15th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1996: 1667– 77
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gordon CM,
    2. Gordon LB,
    3. Snyder BD,
    4. et al
    . Hutchinson-Gilford progeria is a skeletal dysplasia. J Bone Miner Res 2011; 26: 1670– 79
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Parfitt AM
    . Age-related structural changes in trabecular and cortical bone: cellular mechanisms and biomechanical consequences. Calcif Tissue Int 1984; 36 (suppl 1): S123– 28
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Opperman LA
    . Cranial sutures as intramembranous bone growth sites. Dev Dyn 2000; 219: 472– 85
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rice DP
    . Developmental anatomy of craniofacial sutures. Front Oral Biol 2008; 12: 1– 21
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kirks DR,
    2. Griscom NT
    . Practical pediatric imaging: diagnostic radiology of infants and children. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998; 77
  25. 25.↵
    1. Schmidt H,
    2. Köhler A,
    3. Zimmer EA,
    4. et al
    . Borderlands of normal and early pathologic findings in skeletal radiography. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2003; 376
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wren MW
    . Significance of the so-called J-shaped sella in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm. Br J Ophthalmol 1969; 53: 307– 09
    FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Domingo DL,
    2. Trujillo MI,
    3. Council SE,
    4. et al
    . Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: oral and craniofacial phenotypes. Oral Dis 2009; 15: 187– 95
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Bronstein IP,
    2. Dallenbach FD,
    3. Pruzansky S,
    4. et al
    . Progeria; report of a case with cephalometric roentgenograms and abnormally high concentrations of lipoproteins in the serum. Pediatrics 1956; 18: 565– 77
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Singh DJ,
    2. Bartlett SP
    . Congenital mandibular hypoplasia: analysis and classification. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 291– 300
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received September 30, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision November 18, 2011.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 8
1 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Craniofacial Abnormalities in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Craniofacial Abnormalities in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome
N.J. Ullrich, V.M. Silvera, S.E. Campbell, L.B. Gordon
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2012, 33 (8) 1512-1518; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3088

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Craniofacial Abnormalities in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome
N.J. Ullrich, V.M. Silvera, S.E. Campbell, L.B. Gordon
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2012, 33 (8) 1512-1518; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3088
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A novel somatic mutation achieves partial rescue in a child with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome
  • Imaging Characteristics of Cerebrovascular Arteriopathy and Stroke in Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Neuroimaging Features of Biotinidase Deficiency
  • Medullary Tegmental Cap Dysplasia: Fetal and Postnatal Presentations of a Unique Brainstem Malformation
  • Diagnostic Utility of 3D Gradient-Echo MR Imaging Sequences through the Filum Compared with Spin-Echo T1 in Children with Concern for Tethered Cord
Show more PEDIATRICS

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire