Classification of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations and Intranidal Flow Patterns by Color-Encoded 4D-Hybrid-MRA

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Kukuk GM,
   2. Hadizadeh DR,
   3. Boström A,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral arteriovenous malformations at 3.0T: intraindividual comparative study of 4D-MRA in combination with selective arterial spin labeling and digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 2010;45:126–32

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Warren DJ,
   2. Hoggard N,
   3. Walton L,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography. Neurosurgery 2001;48:973–82, discussion 982–83

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Hadizadeh DR,
   2. Falkenhausen von M,
   3. Gieseke J,
   4. et al

   . Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution four-dimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology 2008;246:205–13

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Nishimura S,
   2. Hirai T,
   3. Sasao A,
   4. et al

   . Evaluation of dural arteriovenous fistulas with 4D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:80–85

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Xu J,
   2. Shi D,
   3. Chen C,
   4. et al

   . Noncontrast-enhanced four-dimensional MR angiography for the evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a preliminary trial. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1199–205

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Forkert ND,
   2. Säring D,
   3. Handels H

   . Automatic analysis of the anatomy of arteriovenous malformations using 3D and 4D MRA image sequences. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;160(pt 2):1268–72

   PubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Spetzler RF,
   2. Martin NA

   . A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;65:476–83

   PubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Fink C,
   2. Ley S,
   3. Kroeker R,
   4. et al

   . Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 2005;40:40–48

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Davis WL,
   2. Warnock SH,
   3. Harnsberger HR,
   4. et al

   . Intracranial MRA: single volume vs. multiple thin slab 3D time-of-flight acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:15–21

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Forkert ND,
    2. Säring D,
    3. Fiehler J,
    4. et al

    . Automatic brain segmentation in time-of-flight MRA images. Methods Inf Med 2009;48:399–407

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Forkert ND,
    2. Schmidt-Richberg A,
    3. Fiehler J,
    4. et al

    . Fuzzy-based vascular structure enhancement in time-of-flight MRA images for improved segmentation. Methods Inf Med 2011;50:74–83

    PubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Forkert ND,
    2. Fiehler J,
    3. Ries T,
    4. et al

    . Reference-based linear curve fitting for bolus arrival time estimation in 4D MRA and MR perfusion-weighted image sequences. Magn Reson Med 2011;65:289–94

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Willems PW,
    2. Taeshineetanakul P,
    3. Schenk B,
    4. et al

    . The use of 4D-CTA in the diagnostic work-up of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neuroradiology 2012;54:123–31

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Al-Shahi R,
    2. Pal N,
    3. Lewis SC,
    4. et al

    . Observer agreement in the angiographic assessment of arteriovenous malformations of the brain. Stroke 2002;33:1501–08

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Du R,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Johnston SC,
    4. et al

    . Interobserver variability in grading of brain arteriovenous malformations using the Spetzler-Martin system. Neurosurgery 2005;57:668–75, discussion 668–75

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Iancu-Gontard D,
    2. Weill A,
    3. Guilbert F,
    4. et al

    . Inter- and intraobserver variability in the assessment of brain arteriovenous malformation angioarchitecture and endovascular treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:524–27

    Abstract/FREE Full Text