Advertisement
Review ArticleEXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR
Open Access

Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1—Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis

E. Johansson and A.J. Fox
American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2016, 37 (1) 2-10; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4432

Abstract

SUMMARY: Carotid near-occlusion is distal ICA luminal collapse beyond a tight stenosis, where the distal lumen should not be used for calculating percentage stenosis. Near-occlusion with full ICA collapse is well-known, with a threadlike lumen. However, near-occlusion without collapse is often subtle and can be overlooked as a usual severe stenosis. More than 10 different terms have been used to describe near-occlusion, sometimes causing confusion. This systematic review presents what is known about carotid near-occlusion. In this first part, the foci are definition, terminology, and diagnosis.

ABBREVIATION:

ECA
external carotid artery

Carotid near-occlusion is distal luminal collapse of the internal carotid artery beyond a tight stenosis.1 Various terms have been used to describe near-occlusion, which can mislead students or those doing literature searches: near-occlusion1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–44 (or “near total occlusion”45⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–51), pseudo-occlusion,1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–20,43,45,47,48,50⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–70 string sign,1⇓⇓⇓–5,7,9⇓⇓⇓–13,16,18⇓–20,22,24,26,30,40,42,43,45,47⇓⇓–50,52,56,60⇓–62,65,66,68⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–74 slim sign,1,2,4,6,9⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–20,28,31,45,47⇓⇓⇓–51,55,59,60,62,64,68,69,71,72,75 critical stenosis,50,70 small or narrow distal internal carotid artery (with variations),1,11,28,36,39⇓⇓–42 preocclusive stenosis,5,46,50,62,64,67 subtotal stenosis,67,76,77 subtotal occlusion,1,9,40,72 functional occlusion,40 subocclusion,50 hypoplasia,11,12,18,45 99% stenosis,66 hairline residual lumen,20,43 and incomplete occlusion.1

Calculating percentage stenosis for carotid near-occlusion is fallacious, and near-occlusion assessment is advised before measuring for percentage stenosis.1,2,32,34 Near-occlusion with full collapse is well-recognized as a threadlike distal lumen. However, partial distal collapse is subtle—near-occlusion without full collapse is sometimes overlooked as stenosis. Carotid near-occlusion was described in 1970 as the carotid slim sign, a severe collapse, and today as near-occlusion with full collapse (Figs 1⇓⇓⇓–5).75 The near-occlusion definition was widened to recognize partial collapse (near-occlusion without full collapse) (Figs 1⇓⇓⇓–5).1,2

Fig 1.
Fig 1.

A case with near-occlusion with full collapse, reprinted with permission from Fox et al.1 Lateral common carotid angiogram shows the thin, threadlike, collapsed lumen (arrows) of the ICA above a prominent ICA stenosis at the bulb (not shown).

Fig 2.
Fig 2.

A case with near-occlusion without full collapse, reprinted with permission from Fox et al.1 Lateral carotid angiogram shows a reduced ICA lumen distal to the stenosis (larger arrow); the diameter is slightly less than the ECA diameter (smaller arrow). The distal ICA lumen is normal-appearing (not threadlike).

Fig 3.
Fig 3.

A case with a conventional carotid stenosis and no distal collapse. Axial CTA at the level of the distal extracranial ICA. The distal ICA (white arrow) is similar to, though slightly smaller than, the contralateral ICA (black arrow) and is wider than the right ECA (arrowhead).

Fig 4.
Fig 4.

A case with near-occlusion without full collapse. A, Axial CTA at the level of the distal extracranial ICA. B, Sagittal reformat of A. The distal right ICA (white arrow) is narrower than the contralateral ICA (black arrow) and similar to the right ECA (arrowhead) but otherwise is normal-appearing (not threadlike).

Fig 5.
Fig 5.

A case with near-occlusion with full collapse. Axial CTA at the level of the distal extracranial ICA. The distal right ICA (white arrow) is clearly collapsed with a threadlike appearance, clearly narrower than the contralateral ICA (black arrow) and the right ECA (white arrowhead). The black arrowhead points to the left ascending pharyngeal artery, ensuring that this is not an ICA occlusion.

The aim of this review was to present the definition, terminology, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and pathophysiology of carotid near-occlusion; highlight areas of confusion; and highlight areas in need of future improvement. In this first part, the foci are definition, terminology, and diagnosis.

Articles

A PubMed search was performed in December 2014 with the terms “carotid near-occlusion,” “carotid pseudo-occlusion,” “carotid string sign,” “carotid slim sign,” “carotid critical stenosis,” “small distal carotid artery,” “narrow distal carotid artery,” “carotid preocclusive stenosis,” “carotid pre occlusive stenosis,” “carotid subtotal stenosis,” “carotid sub total stenosis,” “carotid subtotal occlusion,” “carotid sub total occlusion,” “carotid functional occlusion,” “carotid sub-occlusion,” “carotid hypoplasia,” “carotid incomplete occlusion,” and “carotid hairline,” without search restrictions. This yielded 1076 articles. Title review selected 115 articles of greatest interest. Excluded were articles not in English (n = 14) and those with inaccessible abstracts or full articles (n = 4). Excluded were 26 articles with ≤5 cases (n = 8), not carotid near-occlusion (n = 16), in a non-peer-reviewed journal (n = 1), and not analyzing humans (n = 1). Seventy-one articles were audited. All reference lists were examined, rendering an additional 17 articles. Two key articles1,22 were deemed likely to be cited; we examined all articles that had cited these articles by using the Web of Science data base, yielding 3 additional articles. In total, 91 articles were reviewed.

Definition of Near-Occlusion

A carotid near-occlusion is a very tight atherosclerotic stenosis in which the artery beyond the stenosis is collapsed.1 The remaining patency differs from that in total occlusions and is separate from that in conventional carotid stenoses because of this collapse.1 Near-occlusion can be with and without full collapse: Near-occlusion with full collapse shows pronounced distal collapse with a threadlike lumen.1,21 Near-occlusion without full collapse shows a less pronounced distal collapse with a more normal-appearing distal artery.1,21

Previous Definition of Near-Occlusion.

To the best of our knowledge, near-occlusion and its synonym terms are limited in publications to “near-occlusion with full collapse” between 1970 and 1997, with only 1 exception (presented below).1,2 Before 1997, partial near-occlusion was largely unrecognized, and such cases were likely considered usual stenoses. In 1997, NASCET collaborators redefined near-occlusion, including less complete collapse, more subtle than that previously known,2 effectively presuming that ICAs beyond severe stenosis would progressively decrease from their normal caliber to fully collapsed as a critical degree is reached rather than experiencing sudden collapse. Near-occlusions were then subdivided into those with or without pronounced collapse, also called near-occlusion with and without the “string sign” (here called “near-occlusion with and without full collapse”).2

Terminology

First Descriptions Found in our Article Search.

A collapsed ICA on cervical angiography was described by Riishede and Ethelberg78 in 1953, caused by raised intracranial pressure in brain death. A case of possible near-occlusion was described as “teilweisem verschluss” (roughly “partial closure”) in German by Mumenthaler et al79 in 1961, though without special attention to distal collapse compared with conventional stenosis or occlusion. Lippman et al75 clearly described distal collapse from atherosclerosis in 1970.

Slim Sign.

Lippman et al75 also called distal collapse the “poststenotic carotid slim sign” (later simply “slim sign”) and “spurious hypoplasia” (false hypoplasia).75 Several subsequent authors inappropriately dropped “spurious” when referencing this article (“hypoplasia” instead of “false hypoplasia”).11,12,18,45 Radiographs published by Lippman et al today fit near-occlusion with full collapse. However, the “slim sign” has not been used as the main term in any near-occlusion article after that of Lippman et al; it has been used as a synonym of the main term.1,2,4,6,9⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–20,28,31,45,47⇓⇓⇓–51,55,59,60,62,64,68,69,71,72

Pseudo-Occlusion.

The term “pseudo-occlusion” was used for cases with raised intracranial pressure by Newton and Couch in 1960.80 In 1978, Macpherson54 suggested pseudo-occlusions as possibly caused by “thrombosis or embolus.” In 1980, Sekhar et al51 suggested “atheromatous pseudo-occlusion” to separate atherosclerotic causes from similar findings caused by raised intracranial pressure, intracranial occlusion, dissection, and hypoplasia. Images from Sekhar et al can be called “near-occlusion with full collapse.” “Pseudo-occlusion” has been used for the appearance of a collapsed artery,1⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–9,11,13⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–20,45⇓⇓–48,56⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–62,65⇓⇓⇓⇓–70 but also quite literally when diagnosis changed from occlusion to patent after re-review (not necessarily with distal collapse.10,12,55,63,64,81

String Sign.

The “string sign” was first used for distal ICA collapse in spontaneous dissection as coined by Ojemann et al in 1972.82 In 1980, Mehigan and Olcott71 used the “string sign” term to describe the appearance of a distal artery collapse and presented several cases with different causes: dissection, postradiation carotid disease, and various forms of atherosclerosis or thrombosis. Since then, “string sign” has often described near-occlusion with full collapse (excluding nonatherosclerotic causes). Those who recognized near-occlusion as with and without full collapse have often used with and without the “string sign” to describe this.2,7,22,24,26

Near-Occlusion.

“Nearly occluded” was used by Gabrielsen et al31 in 1981 to describe a tight carotid stenoses with distal collapse. They noted that the reduced caliber usually (not always) was severe, though they featured a case of near-occlusion without full collapse; this is the first instance we found in our article search. However, Gabrielsen et al did not suggest that “near-occlusion” should mean something other than “slim sign.”

Narrowing of the Internal Carotid Artery (ICA/Common Carotid Artery Ratio).

Not recognizing narrowing of the distal artery as near-occlusion was not considered problematic for the European Carotid Surgery Trial because it calculated stenosis degree by measuring the diameter at maximal stenosis compared with the unseen original ICA bulb diameter (European Carotid Surgery Trial grading system).36 As a secondary analysis, the authors identified patients with a collapsed distal artery by examining a ratio between the distal ICA and common carotid artery (ICA/common carotid artery ratio)42 (different from their grading of stenosis by using the common carotid artery method83). The collaborators examined neck sides with <50% European Carotid Surgery Trial–type stenosis (similar to <30% NASCET-type stenosis83) and derived a threshold of <0.42 for ICA narrowing (mean ± 2 SDs).42

Recommendation.

Regardless of which term one chooses, it is important to recognize that near-occlusions with and without full collapse exist. We recommend the term “near-occlusion” because it was used in large clinical trials to describe atherosclerotic stenosis with a distal collapse.1,2,32 We suggest not using “pseudo-occlusion” or “string sign” because of their use for other entities. “Slim sign” was used to describe near-occlusions with full collapse, but not for near-occlusion without full collapse; the use of “slim sign” might cause confusion. Therefore, when we discussed the terminology to use in a recent article,21 near-occlusion with and without full collapse was introduced and we recommended it for consistent use henceforth.

Diagnosis

Near-occlusion with full collapse above a prominent ICA bulb stenosis is easy enough to recognize. However, occlusion can be misdiagnosed with suboptimal imaging and interpretation (Table 1). An ICA occlusion definition requires identification of the ascending pharyngeal artery as a tiny artery ascending adjacent to the expected course of the unseen ICA, but with typical branches just below the skull base. Collapsed near-occlusion smoothly continues into the carotid canal of the temporal bone; the ascending pharyngeal artery is a second nearby vessel. True ICA hypoplasia or long distal ICA tapering of dissection does not show a prominent ICA bulb stenosis. Quality interpretation separates atherosclerosis from high intracranial pressure and postradiation carotid disease. It is also important to consider distal stenoses/occlusions by assessing the main cervical and intracranial arteries for the rare ICA hypoplasia, which shows a tiny bony carotid canal.

View this table:
Table 1:

Mimics of near-occlusion on conventional angiography and CTA

Near-occlusion without full collapse can be mistaken for conventional stenosis if one does not constantly search for subtle distal collapse. The NASCET collaborators recognized that if a collapsed distal ICA is used for percentage caluculation, the stenosis will be underrated. The NASCET method uses the normal distal ICA for percentage1,84 and requires near-occlusion assessment first. If you do not seek it, you will not find it.

One should also not overcall near-occlusion without full collapse. The relative small size of a distal ICA with a larger contralateral ICA can be an anatomic variation. Other causes of asymmetry exist: intracranial occlusion/stenosis and variance of ICA size depending on circle of Willis variations, such as a fetal posterior cerebral artery or a single ICA supplying both anterior cerebral arteries. Artery diameter can fluctuate slightly: It is important to apply the best diagnostic judgment for reasons of variance. In case of contralateral disease, emphasis should shift toward the comparison of the distal ICA and ipsilateral external carotid artery (ECA).22 Consistent diagnostic judgment is needed regarding true distal collapse as reduced: Diagnostic criteria presented below are aids for that. NASCET suggested early on not to calculate percentage stenosis if near-occlusion could be interpreted,84 yet it seems that not all who assess percentage stenosis look for subtle near-occlusion.34

Sometimes a nearly occluded stenosis is associated with intraluminal thrombus,85 a near-occlusion variant. Because the prognosis likely differs, it is reasonable that the presence of a thrombus be mentioned specifically in both clinical and scientific articles.

Most articles on near-occlusion were based on conventional angiography, so we present diagnostic issues based on that technique, with some added aspects of other modalities. Diagnostic studies of near-occlusion need interpretation with caution because there can be misdiagnoses of near-occlusion as occlusion due inadequate angiography findings if a long-enough delay was not allowed, further adding skepticism to occlusion diagnosed with screening tests. The use of conventional angiography is no guarantee of a criterion standard study.

Separating Near-Occlusion from Occlusion.

Some suggested “occlusions” are indeed patent, needing angiography time to detect delayed contrast through a severely collapsed artery.23 Contrast remaining through the venous phase has been reported.23 The ascending pharyngeal artery should be seen as a tiny artery separate from and running parallel to an occluded or nearly occluded ICA. The ascending pharyngeal artery can be overlooked as a collapsed ICA in cases of ICA occlusion (“pseudostring sign”11).

Separating Near-Occlusion from Conventional Stenosis.

NASCET used descriptive criteria to distinguish near-occlusion (with and without full collapse) from conventional stenosis: 1) delayed filling, 2) intracranial collaterals, 3) ipsilateral distal ICA less than the contralateral distal ICA, and 4) ipsilateral distal ICA equal to or less than the ipsilateral ECA (the ICA normally is substantially larger than the ECA) (Fig 6). Two of the 4 criteria were required for diagnosis.1 Separating near-occlusion is justifiable from its observed lower stroke risk compared with severe stenosis, and the potential fallacious calculation of percentage stenosis if not recognized, yielding incorrect percentages as low as 50%–60%, potentially managed differently.1

Fig 6.
Fig 6.

Schematic drawing of the 4 criteria for near-occlusion on conventional angiography. Delayed filling (A), evidence of intracranial collaterals when the contralateral side is examined (B), ipsilateral distal ICA less than the contralateral distal ICA (C), and ipsilateral distal ICA equal to or less than the ipsilateral ECA (D). In all figures, the contrast is gray.

Separating Near-Occlusion with Full Collapse from Near-Occlusion without Full Collapse.

Near-occlusion can be fully collapsed or without full collapse. The current diagnostic criterion for near-occlusion with full collapse is a “threadlike” distal lumen (with variations).1 The transition between near-occlusion with and without full collapse is not distinct. Even so, 90% agreement was reported in a small study (n = 21) between blinded reviewers separating near-occlusions with and without full collapse by using descriptive criteria alone.21 Fully collapsed near-occlusion shows striking ICA collapse and can be overlooked as complete occlusion if images or interpretation are suboptimal. All cases of presumed occlusion need delayed study to seek a late, slow-flowing collapsed lumen. With CTA, ICA occlusion diagnosis may be incorrect without a delayed CTA phase or a routine postcontrast head CT for possible ICA filling-in at the skull base or carotid canal to identify near-occlusion. The incidence of delayed studies with CTA changing the diagnosis from occlusion to near-occlusion is not well-known; certainly near-occlusions with full collapse are seen with CTA, even without delayed studies.70

Diagnosis with Sonography.

There are several mimics of near-occlusion for sonography (Table 2). Sonography aspires to distinguish near-occlusion and occlusion by the presence or absence of flow. Accuracy depends on the sonographic methodology with more accurate distinctions by using Color Doppler with pulsed wave velocity measurements and Power Doppler than the outdated continuous wave technique.8,17,23,45,67,69 Color Doppler with pulsed wave velocity measurements has been reported as separating near-occlusion from occlusion with good accuracy.8,17,23,45,67 Presumably, the small error rate includes very slow and collapsed near-occlusion cases with nondetectable flow. Perhaps the commonly used additional method, power Doppler, may better detect slow flow, but only 2 small studies analyzed this.5,17 Adding transoral sonography to also assess distal artery patency at the level of the pharynx shows promising initial findings.8 Contrast-enhanced sonography might also increase the accuracy, but this has not been evaluated.

View this table:
Table 2:

Ultrasound-specific mimics of near-occlusion

Near-occlusion with full collapse can be seen on sonography with very low flow velocity. The typical recognized sonography appearance is a very tight stenosis with a minimal flow channel, slow flow velocities, and a grossly pathologic flow profile (Fig 7). This finding is 71% (42/59) sensitive5,45,67 and 98.8% (932/943) specific45,67 for near-occlusion with full collapse. Dampened, pseudovenous flow with low pulsatility is highly specific as published in Mansour et al,45 with only 1 false-positive with distal occlusion. A flow profile with systolic triangular spikes and no diastolic flow can be either distal occlusion or stenosis5,18,45,47 or near-occlusion with full collapse12,18,67,76; the sonography report should reflect this uncertainty. Systolic spikes with reversed diastolic flow have been reported in a small series.8 False-negatives were either mistaken occlusions or mistaken conventional stenosis with high flow velocity. Rarely, an important pitfall is when velocity drops to the range of normal flow; a peak systolic velocity of 140 cm/s was presented by Bowman et al.18 As such, the appearance with 2D B-mode of a very tight stenosis and “normal” flow velocities does not add up, requiring suspicion of near-occlusion. However, if the stenosis appearance on B-mode is ignored, the near-occlusion can be mistakenly reported as “no significant stenosis.”

Fig 7.
Fig 7.

Sonographic findings of near-occlusion with full collapse. It is difficult to discern the narrow flow channel despite the low-flow setting and very low-flow velocities with systolic spikes without diastolic flow. CTA confirmed the diagnosis with a patent fully collapsed distal ICA (not shown).

Near-occlusions without full collapse seems indistinguishable from conventional stenosis because both have high flow velocities.5,21 However, near-occlusion without full collapse has only been analyzed for peak systolic velocity in 2 studies totalling 30 patients,5,21 and one of these studies did not clearly define near-occlusion without full collapse.5 Thus, more than peak systolic velocity is needed to distinguish near-occlusion without full collapse from conventional stenoses.

Thus, when very tight stenosis with low flow is detected, it is often near-occlusion with full collapse, though possibly distal disease. Angiographic confirmation (with CTA including delayed images) is reasonable. A finding of a suggested >70% carotid stenosis with velocity on sonography can be >70% stenosis or a near-occlusion. Thus, virtually all near-occlusions without full collapse and some near-occlusions with full collapse can be overlooked if sonography is used alone.

Diagnosis with CTA.

CTA diagnostic accuracy to separate near-occlusion from occlusion has been moderately studied. In 2 studies, 30/30 near-occlusions and 33/33 occlusions were correctly identified.33,37 Separating near-occlusions (mostly partial near-occlusion) from conventional stenosis has been less analyzed. In 1 study, 4/4 near-occlusion (at least 1 was without full collapse) and 22/22 30%–99% stenoses were correctly distinguished.33 Further studies that include delayed imaging are needed.

With a consistent expert observer as the criterion standard, Bartlett et al22 presented CTA-specific diameter-measurement criteria for separating near-occlusion (with and without full collapse) from conventional stenoses: 1) stenosis diameter of ≤1.3 mm, 2) ipsilateral distal ICA diameter of ≤3.5 mm, 3) ipsilateral distal ICA/contralateral distal ICA ratio of ≤0.87, and 4) ipsilateral distal ICA/ipsilateral ECA of ≤1.27. These criteria were not compared with those of conventional angiography.

MRA Diagnosis.

MRA literature for near-occlusion is limited. To diagnose near-occlusion versus occlusion, TOF MRA is limited because slow-flow signal likely is below the visibility threshold; 2D TOF may be superior to 3D TOF.5,17 Approximately 75% (14/19) of all near-occlusions show a flow gap on 2D TOF.5 A flow gap seems similarly common for near-occlusion both with full collapse and without full collapse, though that study did not clearly separate the near-occlusion types.5 Segmental flow gaps suggest vessel patency because occlusions are more likely to show full-length signal absence.5 While it was suggested that the clinical usefulness of TOF MRA is limited because distal occlusions can present with flow gaps,5 it is uncertain that these were truly distal occlusions. No study sought to separate near-occlusions from conventional stenosis. Contrast-enhanced MRA for near-occlusion is scarcely studied.5

Alternative Diagnostic Criteria.

After publication of the 2005 NASCET/European Carotid Surgery Trial near-occlusion criteria with conventional angiography in 2005,1 modifications were suggested. A numeric ipsilateral distal ICA/contralateral distal ICA ratio of <0.5 was sought from one report,28 and <0.2,35 from another. With CTA criteria for near-occlusion, a side-to-side ratio of only ≤0.87 suggested near-occlusion (with and without full collapse), though the authors concluded that an overall interpretation be used rather than measurements because of the variability of disease and anatomic variants to diagnose partial near-occlusion.22 However, the ≤0.87 ratio was derived from diagnostic analyses,22 whereas the other 2 ratios were presented without reference to how they were derived.28,35 It seems that these measured criteria transfer the diagnosis of near-occlusion from a skilled interpretation to synthesized numbers applied without the same skill.

The minimal diameter of maximal stenosis on CTA is an alternative way to grade stenoses, replacing percentage calculations to avoid measuring the distal artery.86 This would remove inconsistencies and ambiguities of creating percentage stenosis. If that method is used, the presence or absence of near-occlusions may still need to be assessed to list near-occlusions separately.

Recommendation

CTA is suggested for current near-occlusion diagnosis. CTA is very accurate in separating near-occlusion from occlusion with delayed imaging, and criteria exist to separate near-occlusion (with and without full collapse) from conventional stenoses. The usual technical concerns with CTA, contrast and radiation, apply. In comparison with conventional angiography, the criteria can be more specific with absolute measurements, with no procedural stroke risk.

The diagnosis of complete ICA occlusion needs delayed imaging to exclude the slowly filling distal ICA of near-occlusion with full collapse. That can be a routine postcontrast head CT after CTA (which also evaluates enhancing brain lesions and delayed collateral pial arteries not shown on initial “snapshot” CTA) or multiphased CTA. While enhanced MRA could show some slow distal ICAs, with acquisition longer than that in the subsecond scan of CTA at each level, MRA, however, has inherent lower spatial resolution.

For sonography, emphasis has often been on the separation of near-occlusion and occlusion; possibly this can be further improved with power Doppler and/or contrast enhancement. More important, it is impossible to separate near-occlusion without full collapse from conventional stenoses with sonography. This lack of sensitivity is a relatively recent finding (from 201421), and many recommendations for diagnostic work-up predated this finding. Recommendations for the diagnostic work-up should be revised accordingly. It seems appropriate to always perform CTA in addition because near-occlusions can be missed with sonography, and those that are detected might be caused by distal occlusion or stenosis.

MRA with 2D TOF or contrast enhancement can separate some near-occlusions from occlusion, but not all. It is uncertain whether MRA can consistently separate near-occlusion from conventional stenosis.

Confusion and Need for Further Improvement

Please refer to Part 2 of this review for the confusion and need for further improvement regarding the definition, terminology, and diagnosis of near-occlusion.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Elias Johansson—RELATED: Grant: several non-profit organizations,* Comments: standard research grants, listed in the footnotes; none had any influence over the work; conforms to “no disclosures.” Allan J. Fox—UNRELATED: Expert Testimony: medical malpractice cases, none related to the topic of this article. *Money paid to the institution.

  • This study was funded by the Swedish Stroke Foundation, the Northern Swedish Stroke Fund, the Foundation for Neuroscientific research at Umeå University Hospital, the County of Västerbotten, and the medical faculty of Umeå University.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Eliasziw M,
    4. Rothwell PM, et al
    . Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2086–94 pmid:16155163
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    2. Morgenstern LB,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. Sharpe BL, et al
    . The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Neurology 1997;48:911–15 doi:10.1212/WNL.48.4.911 pmid:9109876
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    2. Son S,
    3. Choi DS,
    4. Kim SK, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: a single-center experience and comparison with recent studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:1976–81 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.06.001 pmid:23820331
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    2. Sakamoto S,
    3. Kiura Y,
    4. Kajihara Y, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting using the proximal or dual protection method for near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:551–57; discussion 557–48 doi:10.1007/s10143-013-0481-y pmid:23793616
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    2. El-Saden SM,
    3. Grant EG,
    4. Hathout GM, et al
    . Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion. Radiology 2001;221:301–08 doi:10.1148/radiol.2212001606 pmid:11687668
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    2. Martin MA,
    3. Marotta TR
    . Vasa vasorum: another cause of the carotid string sign. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:259–62 pmid:10094348
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    2. Gil-Peralta A,
    3. González A,
    4. González-Marcos JR, et al
    . Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic atheromatous pseudo-occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17(suppl 1):105–12 doi:10.1159/000074802 pmid:14694287
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    2. Fujimoto S,
    3. Toyoda K,
    4. Kishikawa K, et al
    . Accuracy of conventional plus transoral carotid ultrasonography in distinguishing pseudo-occlusion from total occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006;22:170–76 doi:10.1159/000093451 pmid:16710083
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    2. Ogata T,
    3. Yasaka M,
    4. Kanazawa Y, et al
    . Outcomes associated with carotid pseudo-occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2011;31:494–98 doi:10.1159/000324385 pmid:21411990
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    2. Kniemeyer HW,
    3. Aulich A,
    4. Schlachetzki F, et al
    . Pseudo- and segmental occlusion of the internal carotid artery: a new classification, surgical treatment and results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:310–20 doi:10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80250-4 pmid:8896474
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    2. Archie JP
    . Carotid endarterectomy when the distal internal carotid artery is small or poorly visualized. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:23–30; discussion 30–31 doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(94)70117-2 pmid:8301735
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    2. Ascher E,
    3. Markevich N,
    4. Hingorani A, et al
    . Pseudo-occlusions of the internal carotid artery: a rationale for treatment on the basis of a modified carotid duplex scan protocol. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:340–45 doi:10.1067/mva.2002.120379 pmid:11854733
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    2. Nikas DN,
    3. Ghany MA,
    4. Stabile E, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting with proximal cerebral protection for patients with angiographic appearance of string sign. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:298–304 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2009.11.018 pmid:20298988
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    2. Ringelstein EB,
    3. Berg-Dammer E,
    4. Zeumer H
    . The so-called atheromatous pseudoocclusion of internal carotid artery: a diagnostic and therapeutical challenge. Neuroradiology 1983;25:147–55 doi:10.1007/BF00455734 pmid:6888715
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    2. Terada T,
    3. Tsuura M,
    4. Matsumoto H, et al
    . Endovascular treatment for pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 2006;59:301–09; discussion 301–09 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000222650.09509.DE pmid:16883170
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    2. O'Leary DH,
    3. Mattle H,
    4. Potter JE
    . Atheromatous pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1989;20:1168–73 doi:10.1161/01.STR.20.9.1168 pmid:2772977
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    2. Fürst G,
    3. Saleh A,
    4. Wenserski F, et al
    . Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. Stroke 1999;30:1444–49 doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1444 pmid:10390321
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    2. Bowman JN,
    3. Olin JW,
    4. Teodorescu VJ, et al
    . Carotid artery pseudo-occlusion: does end-diastolic velocity suggest need for treatment? Vasc Endovascular Surg 2009;43:374–78 doi:10.1177/1538574409331696 pmid:19223385
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    2. Dimakakos PB
    . Carotid internal pseudo-occlusion: what should we do? Vasc Surg 1999;33:123–24 doi:10.1177/153857449903300129
    FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    2. Hirata Y,
    3. Sakata N,
    4. Inoue T, et al
    . Histopathological features with angiographic correlates of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion: impact of plaque compositions—clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;115:350–58 doi:10.3171/2011.3.JNS101434 pmid:21548749
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    2. Johansson E,
    3. Öhman K,
    4. Wester P
    . Carotid near-occlusion with full collapse might cause a high risk of stroke. J Int Med 2015;277:615–23 doi:10.1111/joim.12318 pmid:25297638
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    2. Bartlett ES,
    3. Walters TD,
    4. Symons SP, et al
    . Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:632–37 pmid:16552007
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    2. Lee DH,
    3. Gao FQ,
    4. Rankin RN, et al
    . Duplex and color Doppler flow sonography of occlusion and near occlusion of the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1267–74 pmid:8871711
    Abstract
  24. 24.↵
    2. Gonzalez A,
    3. Gil-Peralta A,
    4. Mayol A, et al
    . Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: 30-day and long-term outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:252–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2285 pmid:21051515
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    2. Paciaroni M,
    3. Caso V,
    4. Cardaioli G, et al
    . Is ultrasound examination sufficient in the evaluation of patients with internal carotid artery severe stenosis or occlusion? Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;15:173–76 doi:10.1159/000068832 pmid:12646775
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    2. Choi BS,
    3. Park JW,
    4. Shin JE, et al
    . Outcome evaluation of carotid stenting in high-risk patients with symptomatic carotid near occlusion. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:309–16 pmid:20977866
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    2. Saba L,
    3. Mallarini G
    . Comparison between quantification methods of carotid artery stenosis and computed tomographic angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:421–30 doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d0f640 pmid:20498548
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    2. Oka F,
    3. Ishihara H,
    4. Kato S, et al
    . Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion. J Vasc Surg 2013;58:1512–17 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.103 pmid:23891492
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    2. Ruiz-Salmerón RJ,
    3. Gamero MA,
    4. Carrascosa C, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting: clinical and procedural implications for near-occlusion stenosis [Article in English, Spanish]. Neurologia 2013;28:535–42 doi:10.1016/j.nrl.2013.01.001 pmid:23465685
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    2. Edgell RC,
    3. Yavagal DR,
    4. Agner C, et al
    . Recanalization of a symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery near occlusion with proximal and distal protection: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2007;61:E174 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000279742.38178.f6 pmid:17621010
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    2. Gabrielsen TO,
    3. Seeger JF,
    4. Knake JE, et al
    . The nearly occluded internal carotid artery: a diagnostic trap. Radiology 1981;138:611–18 doi:10.1148/radiology.138.3.7465837 pmid:7465837
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    2. Fox AJ
    . How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316–18 doi:10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421726 pmid:8421726
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    2. Leclerc X,
    3. Godefroy O,
    4. Lucas C, et al
    . Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering. Radiology 1999;210:673–82 doi:10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99fe46673 pmid:10207466
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Symons SP,
    4. Aviv RI, et al
    . Falsely claiming use of NASCET percentage stenosis method. Radiology 2009;253:574–75; author reply 575 doi:10.1148/radiol.2532090821 pmid:19864535
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    2. Anzidei M,
    3. Napoli A,
    4. Marincola BC, et al
    . Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2009;251:457–66 doi:10.1148/radiol.2512081197 pmid:19401574
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    2. Rothwell PM,
    3. Gutnikov SA,
    4. Warlow CP
    . Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 2003;34:514–23 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000054671.71777.C7 pmid:12574569
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    2. Chen C,
    3. Lee TH,
    4. Hsu HL, et al
    . Multi-slice CT angiography in diagnosing total versus near occlusions of the internal carotid artery: comparison with catheter angiography. Stroke 2004;35:83–85 pmid:14684778
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Symons SP,
    4. Aviv RI, et al
    . Should modeling methodology suppress anatomic excellence? Stroke 2009;40:3411–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.558452 pmid:19729600
    FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    2. Dix JE,
    3. McNulty BJ,
    4. Kalimes DF
    . Frequency and significance of a small distal ICA in carotid stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1215–18 pmid:9726455
    Abstract
  40. 40.↵
    2. Yadav JS
    . Functional occlusions of the carotid artery (string signs): to treat or not to treat? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010;3:305–06 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.005 pmid:20298989
    CrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    2. Henderson R,
    3. Eliasziw M,
    4. Fox AJ, et al
    . Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 2000;31:128–32 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.1.128 pmid:10625727
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    2. Rothwell PM,
    3. Warlow CP
    ; On behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Low risk of ischemic stroke in patients with reduced internal carotid artery lumen diameter distal to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis: cerebral protection due to low poststenotic flow? Stroke 2000;31:622–30 doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.3.622 pmid:10700495
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Romero JM,
    4. Goodman DN, et al
    . Total occlusion versus hairline residual lumen of the internal carotid arteries: accuracy of single section helical CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1123–29 pmid:12812937
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    2. Koutsoumpelis A,
    3. Kouvelos G,
    4. Peroulis M, et al
    . Surgical and endovascular intervention on internal carotid artery near occlusion. Int Angiol 2015;34:172–81 pmid:25284622
    PubMed
  45. 45.↵
    2. Mansour MA,
    3. Mattos MA,
    4. Hood DB, et al
    . Detection of total occlusion, string sign, and preocclusive stenosis of the internal carotid artery by color-flow duplex scanning. Am J Surg 1995;170:154–58 doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(99)80276-1 pmid:7631921
    CrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    2. Radak DJ,
    3. Tanaskovic S,
    4. Ilijevski NS, et al
    . Eversion carotid endarterectomy versus best medical treatment in symptomatic patients with near total internal carotid occlusion: a prospective nonrandomized trial. Ann Vasc Surg 2010;24:185–89 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2009.07.010 pmid:19900781
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    2. Samson RH,
    3. Showalter DP,
    4. Yunis JP, et al
    . Color flow scan diagnosis of the carotid string sign may prevent unnecessary surgery. Cardiovasc Surg 1999;7:236–41 doi:10.1016/S0967-2109(98)00123-9 pmid:10353678
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    2. Spacek M,
    3. Martinkovicova L,
    4. Zimolova P, et al
    . Mid-term outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with angiographic string sign. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012;79:174–79 doi:10.1002/ccd.23144 pmid:21542110
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    2. Androulakis AE,
    3. Labropoulos N,
    4. Allan R, et al
    . The role of common carotid artery end-diastolic velocity in near total or total internal carotid artery occlusion. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;11:140–47 doi:10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80042-6 pmid:8616643
    CrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    2. Giannoukas AD,
    3. Labropoulos N,
    4. Smith FC, et al
    . Management of the near total internal carotid artery occlusion. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005;29:250–55 doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.12.002 pmid:15694797
    CrossRefPubMed
  51. 51.↵
    2. Sekhar LN,
    3. Heros RC,
    4. Lotz PR, et al
    . Atheromatous pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 1980;52:782–89 doi:10.3171/jns.1980.52.6.0782 pmid:7381535
    CrossRefPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    2. Greiner C,
    3. Wassmann H,
    4. Palkovic S, et al
    . Revascularization procedures in internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004;146:237–43 doi:10.1007/s00701-004-0216-5 pmid:15015045
    CrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    2. Momjian-Mayor I,
    3. Burkhard P,
    4. Murith N, et al
    . Diagnosis of and treatment for symptomatic carotid stenosis: an updated review. Acta Neurol Scand 2012;126:293–305 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2012.01672.x pmid:22607370
    CrossRefPubMed
  54. 54.↵
    2. Macpherson P
    . Pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Br J Radiol 1978;51:5–10 doi:10.1259/0007-1285-51-601-5 pmid:620119
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    2. Regina G,
    3. Testini M,
    4. Fullone M, et al
    . Pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery: report of 15 cases and review of the literature. Int Angiol 1997;16:147–50 pmid:9257677
    PubMed
  56. 56.↵
    2. Pulli R,
    3. Frosini P,
    4. Gatti M, et al
    . Internal carotid pseudo-occlusion: early and late results. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1997;38:15–20 pmid:9128116
    PubMed
  57. 57.↵
    2. Heros RC,
    3. Sekhar LN
    . Diagnostic and therapeutic alternatives in patients with symptomatic “carotid occlusion” referred for extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery. J Neurosurg 1981;54:790–96 doi:10.3171/jns.1981.54.6.0790 pmid:7241189
    CrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    2. Berman SS,
    3. Bernhard VM,
    4. Erly WK, et al
    . Critical carotid artery stenosis: diagnosis, timing of surgery and outcome. J Vasc Surg 1994;20:499–508; discussion 508–10 doi:10.1016/0741-5214(94)90274-7 pmid:7933251
    CrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    2. Yonas H,
    3. Meyer J
    . Extreme pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 1982;11:681–86 doi:10.1227/00006123-198211000-00012 pmid:7155334
    CrossRefPubMed
  60. 60.↵
    2. Romero JM,
    3. Lev MH,
    4. Chan ST, et al
    . US of neurovascular occlusive disease: interpretive pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 2002;22:1165–76 doi:10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se141165 pmid:12235345
    CrossRefPubMed
  61. 61.↵
    2. Remonda L,
    3. Heid O,
    4. Schroth G
    . Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography—preliminary study. Radiology 1998;209:95–102 doi:10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769818 pmid:9769818
    CrossRefPubMed
  62. 62.↵
    2. Berman SS,
    3. Devine JJ,
    4. Erodes LS, et al
    . Distinguishing carotid artery pseudo-occlusion with color-flow Doppler. Stroke 1995;26:434–38 doi:10.1161/01.STR.26.3.434 pmid:7886721
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    2. Sitzer M,
    3. Fürst G,
    4. Fischer H, et al
    . Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis. Stroke 1993;24:1513–18 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.10.1513 pmid:8378955
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  64. 64.↵
    2. Ammar AD,
    3. Turrentine MW,
    4. Farha SJ
    . The importance of arteriographic interpretation in occlusion or pseudo-occlusion of the carotid artery. Surg Gyn Obst 1988;167:119–23 pmid:3041633
    PubMed
  65. 65.↵
    2. Barker CM,
    3. Gomez J,
    4. Grotta JC, et al
    . Feasibility of carotid artery stenting in patients with angiographic string sign. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:1104–09 doi:10.1002/ccd.22433 pmid:20517974
    CrossRefPubMed
  66. 66.↵
    2. Bazan HA
    . Carotid string sign is not necessarily a functional occlusion: admit, anticoagulate, and revascularize urgently. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:1110 doi:10.1002/ccd.22623 pmid:20517975
    CrossRefPubMed
  67. 67.↵
    2. Hetzel A,
    3. Eckenweber B,
    4. Trummer B, et al
    . Colour-coded duplex sonography of preocclusive carotid stenoses. Eur J Ultrasound 1998;8:183–91 doi:10.1016/S0929-8266(98)00074-3 pmid:9971900
    CrossRefPubMed
  68. 68.↵
    2. Kashyap VS,
    3. Clair DG
    . Carotid string sign. J Vasc Surg 2006;43:401 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.042 pmid:16476624
    CrossRefPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    2. Fredericks RK,
    3. Thomas TD,
    4. Lefkowitz DS, et al
    . Implications of the angiographic string sign in carotid atherosclerosis. Stroke 1990;21:476–79 doi:10.1161/01.STR.21.3.476 pmid:2408199
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 70.↵
    2. Bennett DL,
    3. Hamberg LM,
    4. Wang B, et al
    . Diagnostic yield of delayed phase imaging in CT angiography of the head and neck: a retrospective study. PLoS One 2014;9:e99020 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099020 pmid:24905932
    CrossRefPubMed
  71. 71.↵
    2. Mehigan JT,
    3. Olcott C 4th.
    . The carotid “string” sign. Differential diagnosis and management. Am J Surg 1980;140:137–43 doi:10.1016/0002-9610(80)90430-4 pmid:7396077
    CrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    2. Labropoulos N,
    3. Androulakis A,
    4. Allan R, et al
    . The value of colour flow imaging in the detection of subtotal and total internal carotid artery occlusion. Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;31:7757–59 doi:10.1177/153857449703100617
    CrossRef
  73. 73.↵
    2. Gross K,
    3. Wang H
    . The string sign. J Vasc Nurs 2000;18:72 doi:10.1016/S1062-0303(00)90033-5 pmid:11249289
    CrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.↵
    2. Pappas JN
    . The angiographic string sign. Radiology 2002;222:237–38 doi:10.1148/radiol.2221000366 pmid:11756731
    CrossRefPubMed
  75. 75.↵
    2. Lippman HH,
    3. Sundt TM Jr.,
    4. Holman CB
    . The poststenotic carotid slim sign: spurious internal carotid hypolasia. Mayo Clin Proc 1970;45:762–67 pmid:5488817
    PubMed
  76. 76.↵
    2. Görtler M,
    3. Niethammer R,
    4. Widder B
    . Differentiating subtotal carotid artery stenoses from occlusions by colour-coded duplex sonography. J Neurol 1994;241:301–05 doi:10.1007/BF00868437 pmid:8006683
    CrossRefPubMed
  77. 77.↵
    2. Szabo K,
    3. Kern R,
    4. Gass A, et al
    . Acute stroke patterns in patients with internal carotid artery disease: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2001;32:1323–29 doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.6.1323 pmid:11387494
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  78. 78.↵
    2. Riishede J,
    3. Ethelberg S
    . Angiographic changes in sudden and severe herniation of the brain stem through the tentorial incisure: report of five cases. AMA Arch Neural Psychiatry 1953;70:399–409 doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1953.02320330124011 pmid:13079362
    CrossRefPubMed
  79. 79.↵
    2. Mumenthaler VM,
    3. Wellauer J,
    4. Schamaun M
    . “Apoplexie” bei vollständigen und unvollständigen Carotisverschlüssen. Helv Med Acta 1961;28:705–40, continued 808–30
    PubMed
  80. 80.↵
    2. Newton TH,
    3. Couch RSC
    . Possible errors in the arteriographic diagnosis of internal carotid artery occlusion. Radiology 1960;75:766–73 doi:10.1148/75.5.766 pmid:13728703
    CrossRefPubMed
  81. 81.↵
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Nederkoorn PJ,
    4. Beenen LF, et al
    . Carotid pseudo-occlusion on CTA in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a concerning observation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:1591–94 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.02.008 pmid:23453709
    CrossRefPubMed
  82. 82.↵
    2. Ojemann RG,
    3. Fisher CM,
    4. Rich JC
    . Spontaneous dissecting aneurysm of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1972;3:434–40 doi:10.1161/01.STR.3.4.434 pmid:5048783
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  83. 83.↵
    2. Rothwell PM,
    3. Gibson RJ,
    4. Slattery J, et al
    . Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms—European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke 1994;25:2435–39 doi:10.1161/01.STR.25.12.2435 pmid:7974586
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  84. 84.↵
    2. Bartlett ES,
    3. Walters TD,
    4. Symons SP, et al
    . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19 pmid:16418349
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  85. 85.↵
    2. Buchan A,
    3. Gates P,
    4. Pelz D, et al
    . Intraluminal thrombus in the cerebral circulation: implications for surgical management. Stroke 1988;19:681–87 doi:10.1161/01.STR.19.6.681 pmid:3376159
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  86. 86.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–20 doi:10.1161/01.STR.22.6.711 pmid:2057968
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received February 28, 2015.
  • Accepted after revision April 8, 2015.
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Carotid Near-Occlusion: A Comprehensive Review, Part 1—Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis
E. Johansson, A.J. Fox
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jan 2016, 37 (1) 2-10; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4432
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR

Show more EXTRACRANIAL VASCULAR

INTERVENTIONAL

Show more INTERVENTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement