Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Other Publications
    • ajnr

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

  • Subscribe
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Publication Preview--Ahead of Print
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • COVID-19 Content and Resources
  • For Authors
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editors
    • American Society of Neuroradiology
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Podcasts
    • Subscribe on iTunes
    • Subscribe on Stitcher
  • More
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds
Research ArticleSpine

Spine Cryoablation: A Multimodality Image-Guided Approach for Tumors Adjacent to Major Neural Elements

J.P. Guenette, K. Tuncali, N. Himes, S. Tatli and T.C. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2016, 37 (12) 2396-2399; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4923
J.P. Guenette
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.P. Guenette
K. Tuncali
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Tuncali
N. Himes
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N. Himes
S. Tatli
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Tatli
T.C. Lee
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for T.C. Lee
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: We report percutaneous cryoablation of spine tumors in 7 consecutive patients (5 men, 2 women [mean age, 47 years; range, 17–68 years]) by using intraprocedural image monitoring of ice ball margins to protect adjacent neural elements. Complete tumor ablation was achieved in all patients without neurologic complication. Pain relief was achieved in 4 of 5 (80%) patients; the patient with persistent pain was later found to have enlarging metastases at other sites.

Risk of sensory and motor damage is a concern when thermally ablating tumors adjacent to major neural elements.1 Cryoablation is a promising technique for the treatment of such tumors given that ice ball margins can be visualized intraprocedurally with CT or MR imaging, allowing for better prevention of injury to adjacent structures compared with other forms of thermal ablation.2 A recent case series has demonstrated safety and efficacy of CT-guided cryoablation in spine tumors with the use of nerve monitoring and thermal protection techniques,3 and another successful case has been reported using a similar technique followed by cement augmentation and radiation therapy.4 We expand upon that literature by describing a feasible and potentially safe cryoablation method using near–real-time intraprocedural ice ball visualization, preferably with MR imaging, allowing for dynamic adjustment of cryogen gas flow to shape the ice ball to the spine tumor while preserving immediately adjacent neural structures.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and diagnostic imaging of 7 patients (5 men, 2 women) with a mean age of 47 years (range, 17–68 years) who underwent 9 consecutive percutaneous image-guided cryoablation procedures on spine tumors adjacent to major neural elements at our institution between January 2014 and September 2015. Patient demographics and tumor information are presented in Table 1. Because of concern for surgical morbidity, surgery was either determined to be not indicated or was refused by the patient. The study was approved by our institutional review board and performed in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Demographics of spine ablations in chronological order

All procedures were performed in a multimodality image-guided procedure suite, the capabilities of which have been previously described.5 Intraprocedural CT fluoroscopy (Biograph mCT 64 or Somatom Sensation 64; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) or DynaCT (Artis zee; Siemens) was performed in the axial plane. Sagittal, coronal, and oblique reconstructions were generated from the axial dataset at the scanner whenever necessary. Intraprocedural MR imaging (3T Magnetom Verio; Siemens) monitoring was typically performed with intermittent axial T2 TSE (TR, 3000; TE, 87; section thickness, 3 mm) and sagittal T2 TSE (TR, 3000; TE, 106; section thickness, 3 mm) or axial and sagittal T2 BLADE (Siemens) (TR, 2000; TE, 113; section thickness, 4 mm) sequences during active cryoablation.

When necessary, bone access was obtained with an Arrow OnControl Power Driver drill (Teleflex, Limerick, Pennsylvnania). Cryoablation was performed using IceSphere, IceSeed, or IceRod cryoprobes with the SeedNet cryoablation system (Galil Medical, Arden Hills, Minnesota). An anesthesiologist performed general endotracheal anesthesia for all cases. Antibiotics were not administered in any case.

In general, CT or PET/CT was used to guide drilling and cryoprobe placement because they offer superior visualization of bone architecture, whereas MR imaging was favored for monitoring because it offers superior visualization of ice ball formation (Fig 1). MR imaging guidance and monitoring in patient 1 was previously reported in a review paper.6 The procedure on patient 4 was performed entirely with CT because of a large paraspinal component simultaneously ablated by our abdominal interventionalists. The entire procedure on patient 5 was performed with PET/CT (Fig 2) because of simultaneous ablation of a head tumor. Image-guidance and monitoring modalities and technical goals, either pain relief or complete tumor ablation for local disease control, are presented in Table 2.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

51-year-old woman with lytic T10 lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. A, Intraprocedural axial prone CT image rotated for visual convenience demonstrates destructive lesion (black arrows) extending to the thecal sac with a cryoprobe within the mass. B, Intraprocedural TSE T2-weighted image in the axial plane demonstrates ice ball (white arrows) covering the lesion with preservation of the thecal sac (black arrows) and aorta (black arrow with white border), and C, sagittal plane demonstrates the ice ball (white arrows) with preservation of the neural foramina (black arrows).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

50-year-old man with PET-avid C2–C3 neural foramen adenoid cystic carcinoma metastasis largely occult on CT. Intraprocedural axial fused PET/CT image demonstrates cryoprobe (white arrows) coursing immediately posterior to the styloid process within FDG-avid lesion at the end of the second freeze; the ice ball was not well visualized. The carotid artery was immediately anterolateral to the styloid process.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

Methods and results of spine ablations in chronological order

Results

A total of 9 procedures were performed in 7 patients. Outcomes are presented in Table 2. There were no temporary or permanent neurologic or functional deficits.

Two patients required 2 procedures to achieve complete ablation and pain relief. Conservative approaches were initially taken with a 17-year-old man with cervical osteoid osteoma and a 22-year-old man with lumbar osteoblastoma. Both patients had slight residual pain after ablation of the tumor nidus, and both patients opted to pursue ablation of small residual components immediately adjacent to the thecal sac and nerve root. To minimize the risk of complication when ablating the deep regions of residual tumor, preprocedure planning with advanced visualization techniques and simulation with a 3D model were performed.7 Complete cryoablation resulted in complete pain relief in both patients. Complete ablation was achieved in the other 5 patients after a single cryoablation procedure.

Four of 5 patients with preablation pain experienced complete and sustained pain relief after ablation. Patient 6, who experienced persistent pain after cryoablation, was found on 1-month postprocedure MR imaging to have complete ablation of the targeted T10 tumor, but also new tumor in T9 and T12.

Patient 5 had a left neck lymph node metastasis ablated simultaneously to the right C2–C3 neural foramen metastasis.

Follow-up imaging ranging from 1 month to 22 months postprocedure was available for 5 of the 7 patients and demonstrated no new or enlarging residual tumor at the ablation site in any patient.

Discussion

This report describes the methods and early outcomes of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of spine tumors in 7 consecutive patients by using intraprocedural MR imaging to visualize and protect adjacent neural elements. Near–real-time monitoring of the cryogenic ice ball, particularly with MR imaging, allows for adjustment of cryogen gas flow to shape the ice ball to the tumor while preserving immediately adjacent neural structures. Such monitoring should reduce the risk of the neural damage that has been described after CT-guided radiofrequency ablation1 because the ice ball margin is not as distinct on CT. The major drawback to our approach is that an MR imaging–safe power drill bit for percutaneous procedures is not currently commercially available, and, therefore, CT guidance is necessary for cryoprobe placement. When MR imaging is not available as a monitoring technique, use of thermoprotective techniques as previously described3,8⇓⇓–11 should be considered if the ice ball is not easily visualized with CT, particularly with ice ball formation in bone.

Complete tumor ablation was achieved in all 7 of our patients, and complete pain relief was achieved in 4 of 5 (80%) patients with preprocedure pain. There were no temporary or permanent neurologic complications or functional deficits. First ablation of the central nidus of an osteoid osteoma and central nidus of an osteoblastoma resulted in partial pain relief, and complete pain relief was achieved in both patients after second ablation of small residual tumor components, consistent with prior evidence that ablation of the tumor–bone interface correlates with successful pain relief.12

The primary limitations of this study are the small number of treated patients and short-term follow-up. Larger studies and increased radiologist experience, hopefully achievable through 2 active prospective trials,13,14 will help establish the safety profile and long-term outcomes of this technique.

In summary, percutaneous cryoblation of spine tumors by using intraprocedural MR imaging monitoring is a feasible treatment option, even when tumors are adjacent to major neural elements and surgery is not a good option. Continued research is encouraged to establish this treatment as an effective and safe option for patients with nonsurgical or surgically morbid disease.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Kemal Tuncali—UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Canon USA*; Patents (planned, pending or issued): Canon USA.* *Money paid to the institution.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Nakatsuka A,
    2. Yamakado K,
    3. Takaki H, et al
    . Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of painful spinal tumors adjacent to the spinal cord with real-time monitoring of spinal canal temperature: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:70–75 doi:10.1007/s00270-008-9390-9 pmid:18661176
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Tatli S,
    2. Acar M,
    3. Silverman S
    . Percutaneous cryoablation techniques and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol 2010;16:90–95 doi:10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.1922-08.0 pmid:19998248
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Tomasian A,
    2. Wallace A,
    3. Northrup B, et al
    . Spine cryoablation: pain palliation and local tumor control for vertebral metastases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:189–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4521 pmid:26427837
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Greenwood TJ,
    2. Wallace A,
    3. Friedman MV, et al
    . Combined ablation and radiation therapy of spinal metastases: a novel multimodality treatment approach. Pain Physician 2015;18:573–81 pmid:26606009
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tempany CM,
    2. Jayender J,
    3. Kapur T, et al
    . Multimodal imaging for improved diagnosis and treatment of cancers. Cancer 2015;121:817–27 doi:10.1002/cncr.29012 pmid:25204551
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Himes NC,
    2. Chansakul T,
    3. Lee TC
    . Magnetic resonance imaging–guided spine interventions. Magn Reson Imaging Clin 2015;23:523–32 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2015.05.007 pmid:26499272
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Guenette JP,
    2. Himes N,
    3. Giannopoulos AA, et al
    . Computer-based vertebral tumor cryoablation planning and procedure simulation involving two cases using MRI-visible 3D printing and advanced visualization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016 Aug 9. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.2214/AJR.16.16059 pmid:27505064
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Costa de Freitas RM,
    2. de Menezes MR,
    3. Cerri GG, et al
    . Sclerotic vertebral metastases: pain palliation using percutaneous image-guided cryoablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;34 Suppl 2:S294–99 doi:10.1007/s00270-010-0085-7
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Rybak LD,
    2. Gangi A,
    3. Buy X, et al
    . Thermal ablation of spinal osteoid osteomas close to neural elements: technical considerations. Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:W293–98 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4192
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Anchala PR,
    2. Irving WD,
    3. Hillen TJ, et al
    . Treatment of metastatic spinal lesions with a navigational bipolar radiofrequency ablation device: a multicenter retrospective study. Pain Physician 2014;17:317–27 pmid:25054391
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kurup AN,
    2. Morris JM,
    3. Boon AJ, et al
    . Motor evoked potential monitoring during cryoablation of musculoskeletal tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25:1657–64 doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.006 pmid:25245367
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Guenette JP,
    2. Lopez MJ,
    3. Kim E, et al
    . Solitary painful osseous metastases: correlation of imaging features with pain palliation after radiofrequency ablation–a multicenter American College of Radiology Imaging Network study. Radiology 2013;268:907–15 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122398 pmid:23657892
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Image-guided cryoablation of head, neck and spine tumors. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02085941. Accessed June 28, 2016.
  14. 14.↵
    MRI-guided cryoablation to alleviate pain in head, neck and spine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01788410. Accessed June 28, 2016.
  • Received April 13, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision July 8, 2016.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 12
1 Dec 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spine Cryoablation: A Multimodality Image-Guided Approach for Tumors Adjacent to Major Neural Elements
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Spine Cryoablation: A Multimodality Image-Guided Approach for Tumors Adjacent to Major Neural Elements
J.P. Guenette, K. Tuncali, N. Himes, S. Tatli, T.C. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2016, 37 (12) 2396-2399; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4923

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Spine Cryoablation: A Multimodality Image-Guided Approach for Tumors Adjacent to Major Neural Elements
J.P. Guenette, K. Tuncali, N. Himes, S. Tatli, T.C. Lee
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2016, 37 (12) 2396-2399; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4923
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

Spine

  • Postoperative Lumbar Fusion Bone Morphogenic Protein–Related Epidural Cyst Formation
  • Modified Dynamic CT Myelography for Type 1 and 2 CSF Leaks: A Procedural Approach
  • Conebeam CT as an Adjunct to Digital Subtraction Myelography for Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas
Show more Spine

Interventional

  • Diagnostic Performance of High-Resolution Vessel Wall MR Imaging Combined with TOF-MRA in the Follow-up of Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment
  • Outcomes with Endovascular Treatment of Patients with M2 Segment MCA Occlusion in the Late Time Window
  • Direct Aspiration versus Combined Technique for Distal Medium-Vessel Occlusions: Comparison on a Human Placenta Model
Show more Interventional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

News and Updates

  • Lucien Levy Best Research Article Award
  • Thanks to our 2022 Distinguished Reviewers
  • Press Releases

Resources

  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • How to Participate in a Tweet Chat
  • AJNR Podcast Archive
  • Ideas for Publicizing Your Research
  • Librarian Resources
  • Terms and Conditions

Opportunities

  • Share Your Art in Perspectives
  • Get Peer Review Credit from Publons
  • Moderate a Tweet Chat

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Neurographics
  • ASNR Annual Meeting
  • Fellowship Portal
  • Position Statements

© 2023 by the American Society of Neuroradiology | Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire