Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pre-eclampsia is a serious clinical gestational disorder occurring in 3%–5% of all human pregnancies and characterized by endothelial dysfunction and vascular complications. Offspring born of pre-eclamptic pregnancies are reported to exhibit deficits in cognitive function, higher incidence of depression, and increased susceptibility to stroke. However, no brain imaging reports exist on these offspring. We aimed to assess brain structural and vascular anatomy in 7- to 10-year-old offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies compared with matched controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies and matched controls (n = 10 per group) were recruited from an established longitudinal cohort examining the effects of pre-eclampsia. Children underwent MR imaging to identify brain structural and vascular anatomic differences. Maternal plasma samples collected at birth were assayed for angiogenic factors by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies exhibited enlarged brain regional volumes of the cerebellum, temporal lobe, brain stem, and right and left amygdalae. These offspring displayed reduced cerebral vessel radii in the occipital and parietal lobes. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay analysis revealed underexpression of the placental growth factor among the maternal plasma samples from women who experienced pre-eclampsia.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to report brain structural and vascular anatomic alterations in the population of offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Brain structural alterations shared similarities with those seen in autism. Vascular alterations may have preceded these structural alterations. This pilot study requires further validation with a larger population to provide stronger estimates of brain structural and vascular outcomes among the offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- MNI
- Montreal Neurological Institute
- PE
- pre-eclampsia
- PE-F1
- offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancy
- PGF
- placental growth factor
- sFLT-1
- soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1
Pre-eclampsia (PE), a serious clinical gestational disorder, occurs in approximately 3%–5% of all pregnancies.1 The current clinical definition of PE involves new-onset hypertension (>140/90 mm Hg) and at least 1 of the following: proteinuria (>300 mg/day), thrombocytopenia (platelet level <105/μL), renal insufficiency (serum creatinine level >1.1 mg/dL), impaired liver function (blood liver transaminases levels 2× normal), pulmonary edema, or cerebral or visual disturbances occurring after the 20th week of gestation.2 PE is a severe acute disorder, requiring immediate action. Unfortunately, no effective treatments are available for PE, and the only course of action is delivery of the fetus and placenta, often prematurely, which terminates maternal symptoms. Although many theories have been proposed for the origins of PE, specific causes and mechanisms of pathogenesis are poorly understood. A very popular theory is centered on deficient uteroplacental angiogenesis and vessel remodeling, leading to increased vascular resistance, resulting in clinical signs. Many have posited systemic vascular endothelial dysfunction as the main factor underlying this deficient angiogenesis to explain the occurrence of the wide range of clinical indicators beyond hypertension.3,4
Given the strong association of PE with angiogenesis and vessel remodeling, numerous angiogenic biomarkers of PE have been proposed.5 Most important, deficient expression of placental growth factor (PGF)6,7 or overexpression of soluble endoglin7,8 or soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFLT-1)6,7 is strongly linked with the development of PE. In many cases, aberrant expression of these factors will precede clinical signs9 and may predict a more severe form of the disorder.10 Furthermore, women who experience a PE pregnancy with aberrant angiogenic factor expression will continue to exhibit an increased lifetime risk for cardiovascular disease.11,12 The lifetime risk outcomes are also suboptimal for the offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies (PE-F1s), who display an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke13,14 as well as impaired cognitive function15,16 and increased depressive signs.17 This finding raises the possibility that impairment in cerebral angiogenesis in PE-F1 fetuses leads to deficits in cognitive function while simultaneously increasing stroke risk. However, there appears to be no reported study on cerebrovascular anatomy in a PE-F1 population, to our knowledge.
Imaging of cerebral blood vessels can be achieved noninvasively with excellent quality, for example, by using TOF-MRA. With this method, high-resolution images of cerebral vasculature with a good blood-to-background contrast can be acquired without the administration of an exogenous contrast agent. In the current study, we have used high-resolution T1-weighted MR imaging to investigate regional brain volume alterations in combination with TOF-MRA for a quantitative analysis of the regional cerebral vasculature of children 7–10 years of age who were born of PE or uncomplicated pregnancies.
Materials and Methods
Participants
All experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Board at Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital. Participants were recruited from the Pre-Eclampsia New Emerging Team study data base.18 Briefly, pregnant women were recruited to the Pre-Eclampsia New Emerging Team study at Kingston General Hospital between September 2003 and October 2009. Women were diagnosed with PE if blood pressure was >140/90 mm Hg and proteinuria level, >300 mg/24 hours or ≥2+ on a repeat dipstick. Control women, with uncomplicated pregnancies, were enrolled and matched to test subjects for age, race, and parity. Women with a history of chronic hypertension, diabetes (including gestational diabetes), or renal disease were excluded. For this pilot study, women from the Pre-Eclampsia New Emerging Team data base were contacted between July 2014 and February 2015 to request participation of their child. PE-F1s 7–10 years of age (n = 10; 5 male, 5 female) were matched as closely as possible for age and sex to a child born of an uncomplicated pregnancy (n = 10; 5 male, 5 female). Following parental consent and participant assent, children underwent brain MR imaging as described below. During the same session, the child's parent or guardian completed a questionnaire encompassing demographics, socioeconomic variables, pregnancy and birth information, the child's current health status, and family history variables. The accuracy of pregnancy and birth information was confirmed through access of medical records. Socioeconomic status was calculated according to Hollingshead Four Factor Index of Social Status.19 Participants received a Can$25 gift card on completion of the testing session.
MR Imaging
All MR imaging was performed on a 3T Magnetom Trio MR imaging scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) without administration of contrast media or sedation. Among others, a high-resolution TOF-MRA and a high-resolution anatomic T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence were acquired for each participant. TOF-MRA was acquired by using 4 slabs, each consisting of 40 sections with a thickness of 0.5 mm, a TE of 3.59 ms, a TR of 20 ms, a flip angle of 18°, and a spatial resolution of 0.26 × 0.26 mm2. Because TOF-MRA imaging provides a good blood-to-background contrast of arteries but little anatomic information, high-resolution T1-weighted MPRAGE images were used as the basis for the regional vessel and brain volume analysis. The MPRAGE sequence was acquired in a single 160-section slab, by using a TE of 3.45 ms, a TR of 2180 ms, a flip angle of 15°, and an isotropic spatial resolution of 1.0 mm3.
Data Analyses
For the vessel analyses, the cerebrovascular system was segmented in each TOF-MRA dataset by using an advanced multistep segmentation framework.20⇓–22 On the basis of the resulting vessel segmentation, the 3D vessel centerline representation and the corresponding vessel radius for each voxel of the vessel centerline were then calculated by using the method described by Forkert et al (Figure).23 Due to different FOVs of the TOF-MRA acquisition and to enable an analysis of the regional vascular alterations, parcellation of each brain into anatomic substructures was required. First, the well-established Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) adult brain atlas24 was registered to the MNI pediatric atlas (7–11 years of age)25 by optimizing the nonlinear transformation ϕA. Next, the MNI pediatric atlas was registered to each MPRAGE dataset by optimizing the nonlinear transformation ϕP. Finally, each MPRAGE dataset was registered to the corresponding TOF-MRA dataset of the same participant by optimizing the rigid transformation ϕM. All registrations were performed by using the NiftyReg software (http://sourceforge.net/projects/niftyreg/)26 and were visually checked for quality control. A full intracranial brain volume segmentation, the MNI brain regions, and the Harvard-Oxford subcortical brain regions, as defined in the MNI adult brain atlas, were then transformed to each MPRAGE dataset by concatenating the 2 nonlinear transformations (ϕA° ϕP) as well as to the TOF-MRA dataset by concatenating the 2 nonlinear and the rigid transformations (ϕA° ϕP° ϕM) by using a nearest-neighbor interpolation.
After registration, the subject-specific full intracranial brain volume and the volume of each of the MNI and Harvard-Oxford subcortical brain regions, as defined by a probabilistic threshold of 50%, were extracted in T1 space. The full intracranial volume was used to calculate normalized regional brain volumes to account for different head geometries. Normalized regional brain volumes are expressed as a percentage of the full intracranial volume. The MNI brain regions extracted and quantified were the cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, parietal lobe, and temporal lobe. The Harvard-Oxford brain regions extracted and quantified were the amygdalae, brain stem, caudate, cerebral cortex, cerebral white matter, lateral ventricles, pallidum, putamen, and thalamus. The volume of the Harvard-Oxford subcortical brain regions was calculated separately for the left and right hemispheres, except for the brain stem.
For the regional vessel analysis, the mean vessel radius and the vascular attenuation were calculated only for the larger MNI and Harvard-Oxford brain regions because smaller regions are too susceptible to noise artifacts. The MNI brain regions used for vessel analysis were the cerebellum, frontal lobe, occipital lobe, parietal lobe, and temporal lobe. Harvard-Oxford brain regions used for vessel analysis were the cerebral white matter and cerebral cortex. Vascular attenuation within each region was calculated by dividing the total volume of segmented vascular structures within a given region by the total volume of brain tissue in that same region. This value was then multiplied by 100 to be expressed as a percentage.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays
Pregnant women recruited to the Pre-Eclampsia New Emerging Team study were asked to give peripartum blood samples. Of the participants used in this study, 4 women with PE and 8 control women consented to blood sample donation. Samples were collected in heparin and were stored at −80°C until used for analysis. Blood samples were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for PGF, sFLT-1, and soluble endoglin by using purchased kits (Quantikine; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota); enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. PE and control samples were diluted 1:1 for PGF, 1:25 for sFLT-1, and 1:4 for soluble endoglin.
Statistics
Equality of variances of continuous variables between groups was assessed by the F test. Differences in continuous variables between groups were analyzed by 2-tailed unpaired t tests for demographic and plasma protein data using the Satterthwaite approximation for unequal variances when appropriate. Differences in categoric variables between groups were analyzed by the χ2 test or Fisher exact test when expected counts were <5. Differences in parameters extracted from MR imaging between groups were analyzed by multivariate analysis of covariance with consideration to age, height, and weight of the participants as covariates. The multivariate effect of each independent variable was assessed by the Wilks λ, which is a measure of the proportion of variance of the dependent variables that is accounted for by the independent variable. Adjusted means were calculated for each parameter on the basis of the linear models produced in the MANCOVA analysis. Pair-wise comparisons were corrected for multiple comparisons by the Bonferroni method. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error, unless stated otherwise. Differences between groups were considered statistically significant at a P value < .05. Statistical analyses were conducted by using SAS, Version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) and SPSS, Version 22 (IBM, Armonk, New York).
Results
The characteristics of the study samples are displayed in Table 1. The PE-F1 and control groups differed significantly in birth weight (control: 3419.9 ± 361.2 g versus PE: 2665.2 ± 788.7 g, P = .013). All other characteristics, including gestational age at birth, were not significantly different between the PE-F1 and control groups.
The MANCOVA analysis showed no overall effect of PE status (λ = 0.058, P = .649). Similarly, none of the covariates displayed a significant overall effect on the extracted parameters (age: λ = 0.024, P = .448; height: λ = 0.020, P = .416; weight: λ = 0.041, P = .566). Post hoc analyses did reveal significant differences among pair-wise comparisons of individual extracted parameters. The MPRAGE imaging revealed no significant difference in total intracranial volume between the control and PE groups (control: 1431.7 ± 33.6 mL versus PE: 1495.5 ± 33.6 mL, P = .201; Table 2). The PE group displayed statistically significantly larger adjusted mean normalized volumes in 5 brain regions: cerebellum (control: 8.72 ± 0.21% versus PE: 9.58 ± 0.21%, P = .010; Table 2), temporal lobe (control: 8.98 ± 0.15% versus PE: 9.65 ± 0.15%, P = .007; Table 2), left amygdala (control: 0.09 ± 0.003% versus PE: 0.10 ± 0.003%, P = .023; Table 2), right amygdala (control: 0.11 ± 0.002% versus PE: 0.12 ± 0.002%, P = .012; Table 2), and brain stem (control: 1.27 ± 0.04% versus PE: 1.40 ± 0.04%, P = .015; Table 2). None of the other 21 brain regions analyzed displayed statistically significant differences (Table 2).
The analysis of the TOF-MRA datasets revealed significant differences in 2 regions: the occipital lobe and parietal lobe. In the occipital lobe, the mean vessel radius was significantly smaller in the PE group (control: 0.50 ± 0.01 mm versus PE: 0.45 ± 0.01 mm, P = .004; Table 3). Similarly, in the parietal lobe, the mean vessel radius was significantly smaller in the PE group (control: 0.55 ± 0.01 mm versus PE: 0.52 ± 0.01 mm, P = .025; Table 3). There were no significant differences in vessel radius between the PE and control groups for any of the other brain regions analyzed (Table 3). Additionally, there were no significant differences in vascular attenuation between the PE and control groups for any of the 7 brain regions analyzed (On-line Table).
Analysis of maternal plasma samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay revealed that PE samples expressed significantly lower levels of PGF (control: 221.0 ± 46.6 pg/mL versus PE: 37.2 ± 21.5 pg/mL, P = .024). PE samples did not display statistically significant different concentrations of sFLT-1 (control: 12,272 ± 3302 pg/mL versus PE: 23,596 ± 13,630 pg/mL, P = .479) or soluble endoglin (control: 13.34 ± 3.40 ng/mL versus PE: 40.43 ± 21.10 ng/mL, P = .294) compared with controls.
Discussion
Although numerous reports exist regarding cognitive function,15 risk of depression,17 or stroke14 among PE-F1s, our study aimed to link these outcomes to potential underlying defects in structural development. Prematurity has long been known to adversely affect brain growth and development and is linked to increased likelihood of variation of the circle of Willis.27 Although the effects of prematurity cannot be completely ruled out, the PE-F1s examined in this study were not born significantly earlier in gestation than the cohort-matched controls. Additionally, children of each group were not significantly different with respect to height or weight at the time of testing. Thus, long-term effects of PE on the growth trajectory are not apparent. Thus, the effects seen in the PE-F1s in this study can be attributed to the experience of gestation in a PE pregnancy. This would be consistent with previous findings of impairment among PE-F1s compared with offspring born of pregnancies complicated by gestational hypertension.15,16
As expected, the maternal plasma samples displayed an aberrant expression pattern of an angiogenic factor (ie, underexpression of the proangiogenic PGF). Unexpectedly, however, the PE-F1s displayed larger volumes in 5 brain regions (cerebellum, temporal lobe, brain stem, left and right amygdalae) but smaller vessel radii in the occipital and parietal lobes. In line with this finding, all other regions examined also displayed a nonsignificant trend for smaller vessel radii for PE-F1s compared with controls. This finding suggests that the aberrant maternal angiogenic signaling milieu common among PE pregnancies adversely affects brain vascular growth in the offspring. The described vessel measurements are mostly related to vessels in the sulci that are responsible for the blood supply of the brain tissue. Although these arteries are, strictly speaking, outside the brain regions used, they are still covered by the brain atlas regions because a probabilistic threshold of 50% was used for definition of the binary brain regions. Nevertheless, the reduction in brain vessel radii among PE-F1s does not appear to affect brain growth. This finding raises the question of how PE gestation leads to deficits in cognitive function and increased susceptibility to stroke in the offspring. The answer may lie in the disrupted general architecture of the brain, potentially causing imbalances in signaling between adjacent regions. This is a phenomenon seen in autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, in which the growth trajectory of the brain is disrupted, particularly in early life.28,29
The regional brain volumetric alterations seen in this study may further shed light on the specific cognitive functional profile of PE-F1s. Enlarged left and right amygdalae are also commonly seen in autism spectrum disorder30 and are associated with an increased incidence of temporal lobe epilepsy.31,32 Most interesting, the temporal lobe was also enlarged in PE-F1s compared with controls. A commonly prescribed antiepileptic, valproic acid, can also induce hypertrophy of the amygdalae, leading to autistic-like behaviors in a rat model.33 Additionally, early life stress has been shown to have an effect on amygdala hypertrophy in a macaque model, acting through serotonin signaling.34 This is mirrored in a study of children, showing that enlarged amygdalae are associated with increased anxiety.35 Cerebellar and brain stem enlargements are common among small-for-gestational-age neonates at term.36 These enlargements correlated significantly with cluster scores from the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale.36 Additionally, children born very preterm display delays in cortical thinning compared with children born at term.37 Thus, the brain anomalies observed among PE-F1 in the present study may be caused by a combined effect of a PE gestation in addition to prematurity and fetal growth restriction. Further study will be necessary to separate the effects of each factor on brain development in these children.
Our data also agree well with studies of animal models of PE. In a mouse model of PE induced by pregnancy-specific lentiviral overexpression of sFLT-1, offspring displayed structural alterations in numerous brain regions.38 In this case, many of the structural alterations were enlargements, with patterns of alterations differing between sexes. Furthermore, this model induced impairments in vestibular function, balance, and coordination in the offspring.39 In both cases, maternal treatment with pravastatin prevented the structural and functional impairments seen in the offspring. Furthermore, brain developmental and functional impairments were displayed in the offspring of a rat model of PE induced by maternal treatment with Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, a potent nitric oxide synthase inhibitor.40 The authors found that the Nω-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester–treated rat offspring displayed impaired neurogenesis but increased gliogenesis, which compensated for the reduction in neurogenesis to normalize brain weight. Therefore, although brain structural anatomy was essentially normal in the offspring of this model, the treatment led to functional deficits in spatial learning and memory.40
Our pilot study provides fresh insight into the well-documented cognitive functional outcomes among PE-F1s. By examining children rather than adults, though somewhat more challenging, our study results are less susceptible to confounding from long-term environmental exposures that may also deviate cognitive functioning. Additionally, we are able to detect anomalies in specific brain regions relatively early in life, when interventional strategies may still provide very profound beneficial long-term effects. Although sample size and range in childhood ages are limited, our findings are consistent with numerous previously published studies that have consistently shown impaired cognitive functions among PE-F1s.15 Through this study, we have provided a foundation on which future studies can build. The focus within our group will be to increase participant recruitment for this study to provide more accurate estimates of how brain vascular and structural alterations may lead to functional deficits. Within this context, the results of this study need to be considered exploratory at this stage because of the rather small sample size. On the basis of the clear differences found in the vascular anatomy, it appears most fruitful to investigate the cerebrovascular system in more detail (eg, by investigating the branching index of vessels in different brain regions or even by developing vascular network analysis methods).41
Conclusions
We have shown that PE-F1 as children display significant enlargement of the cerebellum, brain stem, temporal lobe, and right and left amygdalae. Additionally, PE-F1s display significantly reduced vessel radii in the occipital and parietal lobes. These structural and vascular anomalies may underlie the cognitive deficits reported in PE-F1 populations and may contribute to an elevated lifetime risk of depression and stroke.
Acknowledgments
We thank the participants and their families for taking part in the study. We thank Mrs Aysha Tayab, Queen's University, for assistance in participant recruitment and acquiring questionnaire data, and Ms Janelle Zhan, Queen's University, for assistance in acquiring questionnaire data.
Footnotes
Disclosures: Matthew T. Rätsep—RELATED: Grant: Kingston General Hospital Foundation; Canadian Institutes of Health Research.* Vanessa R. Kay—RELATED: Grant: Grant funding for the lab is disclosed on the Principal Investigator's disclosure form*; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Travel Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to attend the Gordon Research Conference on Angiogenesis (August 2015); Other: Canadian Institutes of Health Research,* Comments: MD/PhD program funding support to the institution; the program provides me (a student) with stipend. Queen's University also provides stipend support. Michael A. Adams—RELATED: Grant: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.* James N. Reynolds—RELATED: Grant: NeuroDevNet,* Comments: NeuroDevNet is funded by the Networks of Centers of Excellence, a program of the Canadian federal government to advance science and technology; UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: NeuroDevNet,* Comments: NeuroDevNet is funded by the Networks of Centers of Excellence, a program of the Canadian federal government to advance science and technology. Barbara Anne Croy—RELATED: Grant: Harry Botterell Foundation for the Neurological Sciences Award,* Comments: Internal Institutional award administered through Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, for the Kingston General Hospital Research Foundation. The amount of the award was Can$10,000. I was the Principal Investigator on the 1-year award made June 1, 2014. These funds covered the MRI user fees for the studies reported in the article; UNRELATED: Employment: I am an employee of Queen's University, Comments: The funds awarded were in an internal university competition, and a proposal was written and ranked by others in a peer review for this and all other Kingston General Hospital Foundation Awards; Grants/Grants Pending: Garfield Kelly and Harry Botterell Foundation for the Neurological Sciences,* Comments: I received internal competitive funds of Can$10,000 from my university for June 1, 2015 from the Garfield Kelly Award (Can$2500) and the Botterell Foundation (Can$7500). The former enabled the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay studies reported in the article. The Botterell funds will permit us to access a second pregnancy cohort, the OaK (Ottawa and Kingston cohort), and support MRI user fees to study 4 more pairs of children. *Money paid to the institution.
This work was supported by the Harry Botterell Foundation for the Neurological Sciences Award from Kingston General Hospital Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; and NeuroDevNet, which is funded by the Networks of Centers of Excellence, a federal government program to advance science and technology. B.A.C. is funded by the Canada Research Chairs program; M.T.R. is funded by a Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org
References
- Received August 17, 2015.
- Accepted after revision November 5, 2015.
- © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology