Striving for the Best: How Far Should We Go? Regarding “Impact of Modified TICI 3 versus Modified TICI 2b Reperfusion Score to Predict Good Outcome following Endovascular Therapy”

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Manning NW,
   3. Chapot R,
   4. Meyers PM

   . Endovascular stroke management: key elements of success. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:170–77 doi:10.1159/000445449 pmid:27111086

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Yoo AJ,
   3. Simonsen CZ,
   4. Prabhakaran S, et al

   . Refining angiographic biomarkers of revascularization: improving outcome prediction after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke 2013;44:2509–12 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990 pmid:23920017

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Dargazanli C,
   3. Consoli A,
   4. Barral M, et al

   . Impact of modified TICI 3 versus modified TICI 2b reperfusion score to predict good outcome following endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:90–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4968 pmid:27811134

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Kleine JF,
   3. Wunderlich S,
   4. Zimmer C, et al

   . Time to redefine success? TICI 3 versus TICI 2b recanalization in middle cerebral artery occlusion treated with thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:117–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012218 pmid:26888952

   Abstract/FREE Full Text