Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Clinical Implementation of 7T MRI for the Identification of Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms versus Anatomic Variants

P. Radojewski, J. Slotboom, A. Joseph, R. Wiest and P. Mordasini
American Journal of Neuroradiology December 2021, 42 (12) 2172-2174; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7331
P. Radojewski
aFrom the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (P.R., J.S., R.W., P.M.), Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Radojewski
J. Slotboom
aFrom the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (P.R., J.S., R.W., P.M.), Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Slotboom
A. Joseph
bAdvanced Clinical Imaging Technology (A.J.), Siemens Healthcare AG, Bern, Switzerland
cTranslational Imaging Center (A.J.), Sitem-Insel, Bern, Switzerland
dDepartments of Radiology and Biomedical Research (A.J.), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Joseph
R. Wiest
aFrom the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (P.R., J.S., R.W., P.M.), Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Wiest
P. Mordasini
aFrom the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (P.R., J.S., R.W., P.M.), Bern University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Mordasini
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Most unruptured intracranial aneurysms can be adequately characterized using 1.5T and 3T MR imaging. Findings in a subgroup of patients can remain unclear due to difficulties in distinguishing aneurysms from vascular anatomic variants. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 30 patients with suspected incidental aneurysms on 3T MR imaging who underwent 7T MR imaging. In all 30 cases, the differentiation of an aneurysm versus a vascular variant could be achieved. In 20 cases (66%), the initial suspected diagnosis was revised. Our findings suggest that 7T MR imaging provides a clarification tool for the group of patients with suspected unruptured intracranial aneurysms and diagnostic ambiguity after standard 3T MR imaging.

ABBREVIATION:

UIA
unruptured intracranial aneurysm

The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) in the general population is estimated to be about 3%–5%.1 Most UIAs can be sufficiently characterized and followed up using conventional 1.5T and 3T MR imaging. However, findings in a relevant subgroup of patients can remain ambiguous when using 1.5T and 3T MR imaging due to difficulties in distinguishing aneurysms from vascular anatomic variants such as vessel infundibula or loops. Especially, small findings (<5 mm) may remain ambiguous: Up to 18% of findings on 3T 3D-TOF may be unclear, and in the remaining 82%, they may be regarded as clear. False-positive and -negative rates of up to 6% and 2% can be observed.2⇓-4 Diagnostic uncertainty may lead to potentially unnecessary follow-up examinations or even invasive diagnostic procedures (DSA). The consequence is patient anxiety, risk of co-morbidities, and considerable additional costs.

MR imaging at 7T may provide a definitive noninvasive diagnosis in this subgroup of patients because the higher magnetic field strength enables image acquisition with a higher signal-to-noise ratio, higher spatial resolution, and higher vessel contrast. MR imaging at 7T has recently received the CE mark and FDA clearance and can be implemented beyond research settings. Previous studies have suggested the superiority of 7T MR imaging over 1.5T or 3T MR imaging in the depiction and characterization of aneurysms.5 A strong correlation between 7T and DSA has also been shown previously, with some studies reporting sensitivity rates comparable with those of DSA.6 However, most of the existing evidence is derived from an experimental setting. We report our single-institution experience of integration of 7T MR imaging in a clinical routine work-up for the management of patients with ambiguous neurovascular findings on 3T MR imaging suspicious for small UIAs. We hypothesize that 7T MR imaging provides definitive, noninvasive discrimination of intracranial aneurysms versus normal vascular variants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

We identified 30 patients with suspected incidental UIAs after routine 3T MR imaging who underwent additional 7T MR imaging. The interdisciplinary neurovascular board at Bern University Hospital screened and selected the patients during the clinical-management process. Approximately 800 patients with confirmed or suspected intracranial aneurysms are presented for evaluation annually to this board, representing all cases referred to our institution as a tertiary referral center. Patients with small, incidental ambiguous findings, ie, suspected UIAs, on recent routine 3T MR imaging were additionally examined with 7T MR imaging on the basis of the recommendation of the board. The findings were reviewed by the board, and a management recommendation was made. All patients were examined between October 2019 and March 2021. All patients signed the informed consent form, and the analysis was approved by the local ethics committee.

Imaging Protocol

All patients were scanned on a clinically approved 7T whole-body MR imaging scanner (Magnetom Terra, clinical mode; Siemens) equipped with a 1-channel transmit and 32-channel receive head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA, USA) and on a 3T Magnetom Prisma scanner (Siemens) equipped with a 32-channel head coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington, MA, USA).

The 7T imaging comprised the following sequences: sagittal T1 MPRAGE, 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm3; axial T2 spin-echo, 0.3 × 0.3 × 1.5 mm3; axial SWI, 0.2 × 0.2 × 1.2 mm3; axial arterial TOF angiography, 0.14 × 0.14 × 0.25 mm3 (interpolated, acquired: 0.36 × 0.28 × 0.50 mm3), and sagittal T1 sampling perfection with application optimized contrast by using different flip angle evolution (SPACE; Siemens), 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm3 (Online Supplemental Data). No intravenous contrast agent was administered. The 3T imaging was a standardized contrast-enhanced protocol (including arterial TOF angiography and contrast-enhanced angiography) (Online Supplemental Data).

Analysis

In clinical routine, all images were reviewed by 2 readers and subsequently presented to the referring board. We analyzed the following: 1) board decisions and recommendations before 7T MR imaging, 2) reports from 3T MR imaging and subsequent 7T MR imaging, and 3) board decisions and recommendations after 7T MR imaging to capture changes in diagnosis and management. We used a simple binomial test considering ambiguous-versus-nonambiguous diagnoses. P values < .05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Thirty patients with suspected incidental UIAs after routine 3T MR imaging were included (19 women and 11 men; median age, 56 years; mean age, 51 years; range, 16–71 [SD, 15.5] years) (Online Supplemental Data). All MR imaging examinations were performed without interruption or adverse effects. All images fulfilled the criteria of diagnostic quality within routine image reading. In all 30 cases, no ambiguous findings remained after 7T MR imaging, and a definitive diagnosis was made according to the analyzed reports (P < .001).

In 20 cases (66%), the initial suspected diagnosis was revised. In 18 of the 20 cases (60%), the initial diagnosis of suspected UIA was revised in favor of a normal vessel (infundibulum, Fig 1, or perforating artery, Fig 2, and Online Supplemental Data). As a result, because UIA was ruled out, no further follow-up was recommended by the interdisciplinary neurovascular board. In the 2 remaining cases (6.7%) (prominent tip of the basilar artery and vessel loop, but UIA could not be ruled out), the initial suspected diagnosis was revised in favor of a true aneurysm. In 1 of these 2 cases, a standard follow-up was recommended; in the remaining case, DSA was recommended due to a high-risk profile.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

A, A UIA was reported on the basis of 3T MR imaging (MIP reconstruction of the 3D-TOF angiography, zoom in the right upper corner). B, MIP reconstruction of the TOF acquired at 7T MR imaging depicts an infundibulum emerging from the anterior communicating artery (zoom in the right upper corner). The blue arrow is indicating the finding of interest.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

A, A UIA was suspected on the basis of 3T MR imaging (axial 3D-TOF angiography, zoom in the right upper corner). B, MR imaging at 7T depicts a perforator artery parallel to the right superior cerebellar artery (axial 3D-TOF angiography, zoom in the right upper corner). The blue arrow is indicating the finding of interest.

In 10 cases (33%), the initial diagnosis was confirmed. Therefore, in 8 cases (26.7%), a definitive diagnosis of an UIA was confirmed, and as a consequence, the interdisciplinary board recommended annual MR imaging follow-up according to the institutional guidelines for small UIAs. In 2 cases (6.7%), 7T MR imaging confirmed the presence of an infundibulum and ruled out the presence of a UIA; therefore, no further follow-up was recommended.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest that 7T MR imaging provides a clarification tool for the group of patients with suspected UIAs and diagnostic ambiguity after standard 3T MR imaging. DSA as the criterion standard is not available for this cohort, a potential limitation; however, performing an invasive procedure would not necessarily be justifiable. The higher diagnostic confidence7 may enable avoiding unnecessary follow-up examinations or invasive DSA. Similarly, revision of an UIA diagnosis toward a normal vascular variant reduces the number of unnecessary follow-up imaging procedures, which would be otherwise performed according to our institutional and national standards.

Most important, socioeconomic factors of suspected, incidental aneurysms and ambiguous vascular findings on 1.5T and 3T MR imaging should be taken into consideration. In this context, resolving diagnostic ambiguities can be especially impactful for young patients with long life expectancies. In our cohort, 26% of patients were younger than 40 years of age. Several studies evaluated the psychological aspects of the UIA diagnosis, suggesting a relevant decrease in quality of life, depression, and anxiety.8,9 The impact of ambiguous findings is less explored10,11 and depends largely on the case-specific communication; however, a similar effect could be expected. Increased diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic confidence, and, as a consequence, reduction of ambiguity due to 7T imaging could potentially improve the quality of life and reduce a patient’s anxiety.

Financial savings due to avoided unnecessary noninvasive or even invasive diagnostic procedures and outpatient consultations in ambiguous findings are expected; however, this expectation is specific to each national reimbursement system. Thus, a dedicated analysis is not within the scope of this study.

We hypothesized that 7T MR imaging allowed us to resolve the ambiguity, first, due to improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio, resulting in better contrast between the vessel and the surrounding tissue and, second, due to the improved spatial resolution resulting in precise assessment of the shape of the vessels. Finally, the maximum-intensity-projection reconstruction of TOF acquired at 7T allows superior visual 3D analysis. As expected, we observed pulsation artifacts and field inhomogeneity in all patients under investigation. However, these artifacts did not influence the diagnostic confidence within the routine use of 7T MR imaging using dedicated vascular imaging sequences.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical implementation of 7T MR imaging in patients with suspected small incidental UIAs has the potential to reduce the number of ambiguous vascular findings and to secure a definitive diagnosis and has, therefore, an impact on patient management as well as quality of life and cost of health services.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Seibert B,
    2. Tummala RP,
    3. Chow R, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms: review of current treatment options and outcomes. Front Neurol 2011;2:45 doi:10.3389/fneur.2011.00045 pmid:21779274
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Li MH,
    2. Li YD,
    3. Gu BX, et al
    . Accurate diagnosis of small cerebral aneurysms ≤5 mm in diameter with 3.0-T MR angiography. Radiology 2014;271:553–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.14122770 pmid:24495263
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. White PM,
    2. Teasdale EM,
    3. Wardlaw JM, et al
    . Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 2001;219:739–49 doi:10.1148/radiology.219.3.r01ma16739 pmid:11376263
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Okahara M,
    2. Kiyosue H,
    3. Yamashita M, et al
    . Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurysms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurysms. Stroke 2002;33:1803–08 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000019510.32145.A9 pmid:12105357
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Wrede KH,
    2. Dammann P,
    3. Monninghoff C, et al
    . Non-enhanced MR imaging of cerebral aneurysms: 7 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla. PLoS One 2014;9:e84562 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084562 pmid:24400100
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Wrede KH,
    2. Matsushige T,
    3. Goericke SL, et al
    . Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2017;27:354–64 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4323-5 pmid:26993650
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Springer E,
    2. Dymerska B,
    3. Cardoso PL, et al
    . Comparison of routine brain imaging at 3 T and 7T. Invest Radiol 2016;51:469–82 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000256 pmid:26863580
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Su SH,
    2. Xu W,
    3. Hai J, et al
    . Cognitive function, depression, anxiety and quality of life in Chinese patients with untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Clin Neurosci 2014;21:1734–39 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2013.12.032 pmid:24913931
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Towgood K,
    2. Ogden JA,
    3. Mee E
    . Psychosocial effects of harboring an untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysm. Neurosurgery 2005;57:858–60; discussion 858–60 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000179917.47904.d8 pmid:16284556
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kumbhar SS,
    2. Baheti AD,
    3. Itani M, et al
    . Ambiguous findings on radiographs. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2021;50:4–10 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.10.003 pmid:31706692
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Domen RE
    . The ethics of ambiguity: rethinking the role and importance of uncertainty in medical education and practice. Acad Pathol 2016;3:2374289516654712 doi:10.1177/2374289516654712 pmid:28725771
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received June 2, 2021.
  • Accepted after revision August 30, 2021.
  • © 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (12)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 12
1 Dec 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Implementation of 7T MRI for the Identification of Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms versus Anatomic Variants
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P. Radojewski, J. Slotboom, A. Joseph, R. Wiest, P. Mordasini
Clinical Implementation of 7T MRI for the Identification of Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms versus Anatomic Variants
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2021, 42 (12) 2172-2174; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7331

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Clinical Implementation of 7T MRI for the Identification of Incidental Intracranial Aneurysms versus Anatomic Variants
P. Radojewski, J. Slotboom, A. Joseph, R. Wiest, P. Mordasini
American Journal of Neuroradiology Dec 2021, 42 (12) 2172-2174; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7331
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 7T MRI as a Powerful Tool to Detect Small- and Medium-Size Vessel CNS Vasculitis
  • Report from the society of magnetic resonance angiography: clinical applications of 7T neurovascular MR in the assessment of intracranial vascular disease
  • Exploration of the potential of high resolution and contrast 7 Tesla MR brain imaging in neonates
  • Crossref (18)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Use of a Commercial 7-T MRI Scanner for Clinical Brain Imaging: Indications, Protocols, Challenges, and Solutions—A Single-Center Experience
    Can Özütemiz, Matthew White, Wendy Elvendahl, Yigitcan Eryaman, Małgorzata Marjańska, Gregory J. Metzger, Rémi Patriat, Jeramy Kulesa, Noam Harel, Yoichi Watanabe, Andrea Grant, Guglielmo Genovese, Zuzan Cayci
    American Journal of Roentgenology 2023 221 6
  • Exploring the impact of super-resolution deep learning on MR angiography image quality
    Masamichi Hokamura, Hiroyuki Uetani, Takeshi Nakaura, Kensei Matsuo, Kosuke Morita, Yasunori Nagayama, Masafumi Kidoh, Yuichi Yamashita, Mitsuharu Ueda, Akitake Mukasa, Toshinori Hirai
    Neuroradiology 2024 66 2
  • Clinical application of ultra-high resolution compressed sensing time-of-flight MR angiography at 7T to detect small vessel pathology
    Dhairya A Lakhani, Xiangzhi Zhou, Shengzhen Tao, Erin M Westerhold, Benjamin H Eidelman, Sukhwinder Johnny Singh Sandhu, Erik H Middlebrooks
    The Neuroradiology Journal 2023 36 3
  • High resolution and contrast 7 tesla MR brain imaging of the neonate
    Philippa Bridgen, Raphael Tomi-Tricot, Alena Uus, Daniel Cromb, Megan Quirke, Jennifer Almalbis, Beya Bonse, Miguel De la Fuente Botella, Alessandra Maggioni, Pierluigi Di Cio, Paul Cawley, Chiara Casella, Ayse Sila Dokumaci, Alice R. Thomson, Jucha Willers Moore, Devi Bridglal, Joao Saravia, Thomas Finck, Anthony N. Price, Elisabeth Pickles, Lucilio Cordero-Grande, Alexia Egloff, Jonathan O’Muircheartaigh, Serena J. Counsell, Sharon L. Giles, Maria Deprez, Enrico De Vita, Mary A. Rutherford, A. David Edwards, Joseph V. Hajnal, Shaihan J. Malik, Tomoki Arichi
    Frontiers in Radiology 2024 3
  • Imaging of Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms
    Charles Beaman, Smit D. Patel, Kambiz Nael, Geoffrey P. Colby, David S. Liebeskind
    Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology 2023 3 5
  • Report from the society of magnetic resonance angiography: clinical applications of 7T neurovascular MR in the assessment of intracranial vascular disease
    Binbin Sui, Bhagya Sannananja, Chengcheng Zhu, Niranjan Balu, Laura Eisenmenger, Hediyeh Baradaran, Myriam Edjlali, Javier M Romero, Prabakhar Shantha Rajiah, Rui Li, Mahmud Mossa-Basha
    Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2024 16 8
  • Imaging of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Review of Standard and Advanced Imaging Techniques
    Sricharan S. Veeturi, Samuel Hall, Soichiro Fujimura, Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Elena Sagues, Edgar A. Samaniego, Vincent M. Tutino
    Translational Stroke Research 2025 16 3
  • Diagnosis of Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Piotr Radojewski, Tomas Dobrocky, Mattia Branca, William Almiri, Manuel Correia, Andreas Raabe, David Bervini, Jan Gralla, Roland Wiest, Pasquale Mordasini
    Clinical Neuroradiology 2024 34 1
  • Diagnosis of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Using Proton-Density Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Comparison With High-Resolution Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography
    Pae Sun Suh, Seung Chai Jung, Hye Hyeon Moon, Yun Hwa Roh, Yunsun Song, Minjae Kim, Jungbok Lee, Keum Mi Choi
    Korean Journal of Radiology 2024 25 6
  • Postmortem imaging of fetuses at early gestations: A comparison of microfocus computed tomography with postmortem magnetic resonance at 9.4 T and postmortem ultrasound
    Patricia Ibarra Vilar, Jacques C. Jani, Mieke M. Cannie, Susan C. Shelmerdine, Sophie Lecomte, Marleen Verhoye, Ciaran J. Hutchinson, Owen J. Arthurs, Andrew Carlin, Xin Kang
    Prenatal Diagnosis 2024 44 5

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more ADULT BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire