Article Figures & Data
Figures
- FIG 1.
A, Mean total (CT + MR imaging) call cases per month aggregated over 5 fellowship classes with R2 values. B, Mean total (CT) call cases per month aggregated over 5 fellowship classes with R2 values. C, Mean total (MR imaging) call cases per month aggregated over 5 fellowship classes with R2 values.
- FIG 2.
A, Average monthly turnaround times for CT and MR studies during fellows' call. Mean (circle) and median (triangle) values are both shown. Dashed lines represent best-fit regression lines during the academic year, while month-to-month changes are shown by the dotted lines. R2values are provided. B, Box-and-whisker plot demonstrates the RTAT for each month. C, Relationships between monthly call volume and monthly median RTATs for CT (square) and MRI (triangle) separately. R2 values are provided. D, Lines depict individual trajectories in RTAT during the fellowship year for each fellow based on a linear mixed-model. The bold line shows the curve for the aggregated data.
- FIG 3.
A, Mean word count added to call reports per month of fellowship of training. Confidence intervals are shown with bars. B, The mean character count added to call reports per month of fellowship training. Confidence intervals are shown with bars.
Tables
Quarter RTAT (Min) 1st (July-September) 97 (95% CI, 91–102) 2nd (October-December) 68 (95% CI, 65–73) 3rd (January-March) 79 (95% CI, 75–83) 4th (April-June) 59 (95% CI, 56–62) Month RTAT (Min) December 58 (95% Cl, 53–61) January 83 (95% Cl, 77–91) - Table 3:
Semiannual change in proportions of call discrepancies between fellows and attendings
Template July-December (pA) January-June (pB) Difference Hypothesis Tests (H0: pA = pB) Great call 0.7% 0.9% +0.2% χ2 = 1.26, P value < .262 Agree 33.4% 42.8% +9.4% χ2 = 106.17, P value < .0001 Addition 52.2% 46.7% –5.4% χ2 = 33.57, P value < .0001 Minor change 12.3% 8.2% –3.7% χ2 = 42.27, P value < .0001 Major change 1.4% 0.9% –0.5% χ2 = 6.61, P value = .010 Note:—pA indicates proportions of call discrepancy during the first half of the academic year; pB, proportions of call discrepancy during the second half of the academic year; H0, null hypothesis.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.