Prevalence of Incidental Extraspinal Findings on MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   World Health Organization. Low Back Pain. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/low-back-pain. Accessed June 4, 2023
2. 2.↵
   2. Wu A,
   3. March L,
   4. Zheng X, et al

   . Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:299 doi:10.21037/atm.2020.02.175 pmid:32355743

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Wagner SC,
   3. Morrison WB,
   4. Carrino JA, et al

   . Picture archiving and communication system: effect on reporting of incidental findings. Radiology 2002;225:500–05 doi:10.1148/radiol.2252011731 pmid:12409587

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Page MJ,
   3. McKenzie JE,
   4. Bossuyt PM, et al

   . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71 doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 pmid:33782057

   FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Hoy D,
   3. Brooks P,
   4. Woolf A, et al

   . Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and demonstration of inter-rater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:934–39 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014 pmid:22742910

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Nyaga VN,
   3. Arbyn M,
   4. Aerts M

   . Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health 2014;72:39–203 doi:10.1186/2049-3258-72-39 pmid:25810908

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Furuya-Kanamori L,
   3. Barendregt JJ,
   4. Doi SA

   . A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2018;16:195–203 doi:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000141 pmid:29621038

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Ibrahim H,
   3. Elsadawy ME

   . Incidental findings in lumbar spine MRI: their prevalence and potential impact on patient management. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 2019;50:59 doi:10.1186/s43055-019-0059-y

   CrossRef
9. 9.↵
   2. Khasawneh RA,
   3. Mohaidat Z,
   4. Khasawneh FA, et al

   . Extraspinal findings prevalence and clinical significance in 4250 lumbar spine MRI exams. Sci Rep 2021;11:1190 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81069-y pmid:33441940

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Quattrocchi CC,
    3. Giona A,
    4. Di Martino AC, et al

    . Extra-spinal incidental findings at lumbar spine MRI in the general population: a large cohort study. Insights Imaging 2013;4:301–08 doi:10.1007/s13244-013-0234-z pmid:23456750

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Rashid SA

    . Prevalence and clinical potential of extraspinal incidental findings in lumbosacral spine MRI of patients with suspected disc diseases. Medical Journal Indonesia 2021;30:256–63 doi:10.13181/mji.oa.215550

    CrossRef
12. 12.↵
    2. Semaan HB,
    3. Bieszczad JE,
    4. Obri T, et al

    . Incidental extraspinal findings at lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:1436–43 doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001024 pmid:26076439

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Tuncel SA,
    3. Çaglı B,
    4. Tekataş A, et al

    . Extraspinal incidental findings on routine MRI of lumbar spine: prevalence and reporting rates in 1278 patients. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:866–73 doi:10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.866 pmid:26175587

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Abdullah AR,
    3. Odish HY,
    4. Mohamedamin HA

    . Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging of lumbosacral spine in patients with back pain and/orradiculopathy. Zanco Journal of Medical Scencesi 2018;22:300–06 doi:10.15218/zjms.2018.039

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    2. Dağıstan E,
    3. Coşgun Z

    . Extraspinal findings on routine lumbar spinal MR imaging: prevalence and etiologies in 4012 patients. Experimental Biomedical Research 2020:3;110–16 doi:10.30714/j-ebr.2020258650

    CrossRef
16. 16.↵
    2. Eroglu A,
    3. Yilmaz I

    . Coincidental lesions that have been seen in patients with lumbar discopathy at spinal MR examination. Medical Science and Discovery 2018;5:137–40 doi:10.17546/msd.397511

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    2. Kahraman AN,
    3. Vural A

    . Added value of coronal-T1W sequence to the lumbar MR imaging protocol for low back pain [Article in English, Spanish]. Biomedica 2022;42:33–40 doi:10.7705/biomedica.5845 pmid:35866728

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Kaya S,
    3. Hatirli H,
    4. Sahin M, et al

    . Incidental findings detected on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine of patients prediagnosed with discopathy. Marmara Medical Journal 2023;36:210–14 doi:10.5472/marumj.1307952

    CrossRef
19. 19.↵
    2. Qasim H,
    3. Al-Bayati H,
    4. Mahmood NA

    . Incidental finding during MRI evaluation of lumbosacral disc prolapse in adults in Al-Hilla Teaching Hospital. Medical Journal of Babylon 2017;14:537–49
20. 20.↵
    2. Romeo V,
    3. Cavaliere C,
    4. Sorrentino C, et al

    . Clinical impact of coronal-STIR sequence in a routine lumbar spine MR imaging protocol to investigate low back pain. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e10789 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000010789 pmid:29879016

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Sobhan M,
    3. Samiee M,
    4. Asgari Y, et al

    . Incidental findings of the lumbar spine at MRI in patients diagnosed with discopathy. International Journal of Medical Imaging 2016;4:44–47 doi:10.11648/j.ijmi.20160405.12

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    2. Zeh OF,
    3. Goujou EG,
    4. Awana AP, et al

    . Extraspinal incidental findings at lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in two hospitals: prevalence and clinical importance. Open J Radiol 2017;07:241–48 doi:10.4236/ojrad.2017.74026

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    2. Zucker EJ,
    3. Prabhakar AM

    . Lumbar spine MRI: missed opportunities for abdominal aortic aneurysm detection. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020;49:254–59 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.05.002 pmid:31151692

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Zalis ME,
    3. Barish MA,
    4. Choi JR, et al

    ; Working Group on Virtual Colonosco. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3–9 doi:10.1148/radiol.2361041926 pmid:15987959

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    2. Ramadorai U,
    3. Hire J,
    4. DeVine JG, et al

    . Incidental findings on magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in the asymptomatic pediatric population: a systematic review. Evid Based Spine Care J 2014;5:95–100 doi:10.1055/s-0034-1386753 pmid:25278883

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. O'Sullivan JW,
    3. Muntinga T,
    4. Grigg S, et al

    . Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings: umbrella review. BMJ 2018;361:k2387 doi:10.1136/bmj.k2387 pmid:29914908

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Zidan MM,
    3. Hassan IA,
    4. Elnour AM, et al

    . Incidental extraspinal findings in the lumbar spine during magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs. Heliyon 2018;4:e00803 doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00803 pmid:30246162

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Dilli A,
    3. Ayaz UY,
    4. Turanli S, et al

    . Incidental extraspinal findings on magnetic resonance imaging of intervertebral discs. Arch Med Sci 2014;10:757–63 doi:10.5114/aoms.2014.44868 pmid:25276162

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Lee SY,
    3. Landis MS,
    4. Ross IG, et al

    . Extraspinal findings at lumbar spine CT examinations: prevalence and clinical importance. Radiology 2012;263:502–09 doi:10.1148/radiol.12112152 pmid:22438363

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Chang CC,
    3. Kuo JY,
    4. Chan WL, et al

    . Prevalence and clinical characteristics of simple renal cyst. J Chin Med Assoc 2007;70:486–91 doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70046-7 pmid:18063502

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Mensel B,
    3. Kühn JP,
    4. Kracht F, et al

    . Prevalence of renal cysts and association with risk factors in a general population: an MRI-based study. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018;43:3068–74 doi:10.1007/s00261-018-1565-5 pmid:29550955

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Gouliamos AD,
    3. Tsiganis T,
    4. Dimakakos P, et al

    . Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms during routine lumbar CT scan: modification of the standard technique. Clin Imaging 2004;28:353–55 doi:10.1016/S0899-7071(03)00316-4 pmid:15471668

    CrossRefPubMed