Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • AJNR Awards
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • AJNR Awards
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR at ASNR25 | Join us at BOOTH 312 and more. Check out our schedule

Brief ReportBrain Tumor Imaging
Open Access

Back to the Future: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT for the Detection of Pituitary Adenoma in Cushing Disease

Ian T. Mark, Jamie Van Gompel, Irina Bancos, Alex A. Nagelschneider, Derek R. Johnson, Girish Bathla, Ajay A. Madhavan, Nikkole M. Weber and Lifeng Yu
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2024, 45 (6) 743-746; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8171
Ian T. Mark
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian T. Mark
Jamie Van Gompel
bDepartment of Neurosurgery (J.V.G.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jamie Van Gompel
Irina Bancos
cDepartment of Endocrinology (I.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex A. Nagelschneider
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex A. Nagelschneider
Derek R. Johnson
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Derek R. Johnson
Girish Bathla
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Girish Bathla
Ajay A. Madhavan
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ajay A. Madhavan
Nikkole M. Weber
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nikkole M. Weber
Lifeng Yu
aFrom the Department of Radiology (I.T.M. A.A.N., D.R.J., G.B., A.A.M., N.M.W., L.Y.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

SUMMARY: Historically, MR imaging has been unable to detect a pituitary adenoma in up to one-half of patients with Cushing disease. This issue is problematic because the standard-of-care treatment is surgical resection, and its success is correlated with finding the tumor on imaging. Photon-counting detector CT is a recent advancement that has multiple benefits over conventional energy-integrating detector CT. We present the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using photon-counting detector CT for the detection of pituitary adenomas in patients with Cushing disease.

ABBREVIATIONS:

EID
energy-integrating detector
PCD-CT
photon-counting detector CT

MR imaging is the primary technique to evaluate pituitary lesions.1 Postcontrast dynamic imaging of the pituitary gland has been shown to be helpful for the identification of pituitary lesions, especially small lesions.1,2 MR imaging of the sella remains extremely challenging, predominantly due to the small size of the pituitary gland and artifacts related to the skull base and sphenoid sinus aeration patterns. Historically, MR imaging has been unable to detect a pituitary adenoma in up to one-half of patients with Cushing disease.3 This is problematic because the identification of the adenoma is an imperative step in successful surgical resection. Photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) is a new technique with increased spatial and contrast resolution relative to conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT.4 The purpose of this report was to describe our dynamic contrast-enhanced PCD-CT technique for the identification of pituitary microadenomas in Cushing disease.

PCD-CT Technique

A dynamic contrast-enhanced CT protocol was developed on a PCD-CT scanner (Naeotom Alpha; Siemens) for imaging patients with Cushing disease. Our institutional practice is to obtain a preoperative skull base CTA to assist surgeons with operative planning. The protocol consists of a skull base CTA scan (120-kV, CAREkeV image-quality level of 230) followed by 4 delayed scans of the sella (effective mAs of 260) spaced 20 seconds apart. All scans used a high-resolution mode with a detector collimation of 120 × 0.2 mm. The CTA scan is triggered by using contrast bolus tracking with an ROI over the ascending aorta and a trigger threshold of 175 HU at 90 kV. For the 4 scans over the sella, images were reconstructed at both 0.2- and 0.6-mm section thickness using a smooth kernel of Hr40 (with quantum iterative reconstruction strength setting of 3). Virtual monochromatic imaging at 70 keV and a low-energy threshold (T3D) were used for the 0.6- and 0.2-mm reconstructions, respectively. We performed a preliminary evaluation on multiple virtual monochromatic imaging energies, 40, 50, 60, and 70 keV, and found that the 70-keV images had the optimal balance between contrast enhancement and noise. A lower keV did increase the contrast between a microadenoma and pituitary tissue, but the increased noise degraded the image quality; 70 keV had the best visual image quality. Per our CTA protocol, the contrast dose for patients weighing <136 kg included Iohexol 350 (Omnipaque-350; GE Healthcare), 100 mL at 4 mL/s, followed by 35 mL of 0.9% NaCL at 4 mL/s. The CT dose index volume was 44.6 mGy for each delayed scan of the sella.

Cases

We present 3 patients who were diagnosed with Cushing disease after a work-up by endocrinology. These patients were defined endocrinologically as having pituitary tumors. Each patient was scheduled to undergo a preoperative skull base CTA to help guide our surgical team. The clinically indicated CTA was then augmented with 4 delayed imaging passes of the sella as described above. In all 3 patients, we identified discrete hypoenhancing lesions, compatible with a pituitary adenoma. These adenomas were most conspicuous on different delayed sequences in each patient. In 2 cases, the CT-identified lesions were not seen with certainty on the comparison MR imaging.

Patient 1.

A 67-year-old woman with osteoporosis, muscle weakness, and progressive weight gain was diagnosed with Cushing disease. Preoperative 1.5T MR imaging including dynamic contrast-enhanced images showed heterogeneous enhancement in the right pituitary gland without a clear lesion. PCD-CT (Fig 1) found 2 clear hypoenhancing lesions (measuring 7 and 4 mm) in the right aspect of the pituitary gland on the third dynamic series. The patient underwent transsphenoidal resection of these lesions, and pathologic examination confirmed corticotroph adenomas.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Patient 1, a 67-year-old woman with Cushing disease. Her preoperative dynamic postcontrast T1-weighted image (left) shows heterogeneous enhancement in the right pituitary gland without a definite lesion. Dynamic contrast-enhanced PCD-CT (right) depicting the third imaging series of the sella with 0.6-mm section thickness shows 2 distinct hypoenhancing lesions (arrows) in the right pituitary gland, found to be pathology-proved adenomas.

Patient 2.

A 57-year-old woman who presented with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type 2 and hypertension was diagnosed with Cushing disease. Preoperative 1.5T MR imaging demonstrated a 2- to 3-mm area of T2-hyperintense signal (Fig 2) in the left superior aspect of the pituitary gland with heterogeneous enhancement on the dynamic contrast-enhanced series. PCD-CT demonstrated a hypoenhancing lesion in the same location, best seen on the first PCD-CT series of the pituitary gland. Intraoperatively, a whitish fluid-filled lesion was seen and thought by the neurosurgical team to be consistent with a tumor, but given its liquidus consistency, it did not generate sufficient material to yield a pathologic diagnosis of corticotroph adenoma. However, biochemical remission was documented postoperatively as the patient developed postoperative adrenal insufficiency.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Patient 2, a 57-year-old woman with Cushing disease. Coronal dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (A, white arrow) shows a small, hypoenhancing lesion in the left superior aspect of the pituitary gland with a corresponding T2-hyperintense signal (B, black arrow). PCD-CT (C, white arrow) shows corresponding hypoenhancement on the first series of the sella, seen as a coronal reconstruction at 0.6-mm section thickness.

Patient 3.

A 68-year-old man presented with osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures, with subsequent work-up demonstrating Cushing disease. His preoperative 3T MR imaging with dynamic postcontrast imaging was severely motion-degraded and nondiagnostic. PCD-CT identified a 4-mm hypoenhancing lesion in the right aspect of the pituitary gland that involved the cavernous sinus, best seen on the fourth series (Fig 3). Intraoperatively, this imaging finding corresponded with a firm lesion that contained a pseudocapsule. Pathologic examination of the resected lesion confirmed a corticotroph adenoma.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Patient 3, a 68-year-old man with Cushing disease. His preoperative MR imaging (A) was nondiagnostic secondary to motion. Coronal (B), axial (C), and sagittal (D) images from the fourth sequence of a dynamic contrast-enhanced PCD-CT show a hypoenhancing lesion (arrows) in the right aspect of the pituitary gland, which involves the cavernous sinus. This was a pathology-proved adenoma.

DISCUSSION

In this report, we describe an imaging protocol for dynamic postcontrast imaging of the pituitary gland on PCD-CT. Pituitary lesions were identified on PCD-CT in 3 patients with Cushing disease.

Traditional EID-CT converts x-ray photons to visible light and subsequently converts the light to electrical signals. PCD-CT, on the other hand, simplifies this process by directly converting each photon to an electrical signal and recording its energy information. PCD-CT has shown an advantage for increased spatial resolution compared with typical clinical protocols on MR imaging and EID-CT.5 In addition to improved spatial resolution and the potential to lower the radiation dose, PCD-CT has a higher iodine signal than EID-CT due to higher weighting of low-energy photons during photon detection, which increases the conspicuity of iodine-enhanced soft-tissue structures.6 While it is a new application only receiving FDA approval in 2021, PCD-CT has already been shown to have multiple useful applications, including evaluation of multiple myeloma involving the spine,7 CSF-venous fistula,8 and temporal bone9 among many other applications. None of these, however, have been applied to pituitary imaging.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced EID-CT imaging of the sella was previously described in the 1980s10 and 1990s10,11 A study published in 2015, including patients imaged beginning in 2004, found that dynamic EID-CT was more effective than MR imaging without dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.12 Modern imaging, however, has abandoned CT in favor of MR imaging.1 Neuroimaging of the pituitary gland in patients with Cushing disease continues to serve an imperative function in its diagnosis and management. Cushing disease is caused by a pituitary adenoma that secretes corticotropin, subsequently leading to an increase in the production of cortisol from the adrenal cortex. Hypercortisolism leads to the development of features of overt Cushing syndrome on examination (skin fragility, bruising, striae, supraclavicular and dorsocervical pads, facial rounding, proximal myopathy); comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, fractures, infections, and pulmonary embolism; and an increase in mortality.13 While inferior petrosal sinus sampling can help to distinguish Cushing disease from ectopic Cushing syndrome, it has not been shown to reliably localize a lesion within the pituitary gland.14 This finding is particularly important because surgical resection is the standard-of-care treatment for Cushing disease. If MR imaging is unable to locate an adenoma, surgical resection is associated with a higher rate of complications and decreased cure rates.13

Our experience is too limited to advocate for PCD-CT as a replacement for MR imaging; however, there are several situations in which CT has advantages over MR imaging. CT tables generally have higher weight limits than MR imaging tables to accommodate larger patients, and the larger bore size of CT could help patients who cannot tolerate MR imaging due to claustrophobia. As shown in patient 3, the faster acquisition time of CT can be helpful in patients who are unable to lie still long enough for diagnostic-quality MR images to be acquired. Additionally, PCD-CT could help in patients who are unable to undergo MR imaging secondary to metal safety concerns, nonconditional implants, or gadolinium-based contrast reactions. Finally, in cases in which patients have overpneumatized sphenoid sinuses that produce problematic artifacts over the sella on MR imaging, CT image quality is not confounded by this problem. Specific to PCD-CT, the imaging technique allows thin, submillimeter section thickness. In our experience, the primary benefit of this technique is outlining the peripheral margin of the adenoma relative to the normal pituitary gland, allowing greater confidence in identifying a hypoenhancing lesion as an adenoma.

At our institution, patients scheduled for pituitary surgery undergo a preoperative skull base CTA to help with surgical planning. Thus, as is the case with all CT scans, this technique increases the radiation dose to the patient. Further work studying a larger number of patients could further refine the imaging technique to decrease the number of imaging passes of the sella and help decrease the radiation dose. Given the clear advantages of PCD-CT over EID-CT and the importance of preoperative adenoma identification in patients with Cushing disease, we believe that this technique should be thoroughly studied, and we will continue to use it as our institutional preference.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide the first description of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging on PCD-CT for the evaluation of pituitary adenomas in Cushing disease. Given the importance of preoperative tumor localization of pituitary microadenomas to patient outcomes, this technique may potentially serve as an adjunct to cases negative on MR imaging.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of the Mayo Clinic CT Clinical Innovation Center and Siemens Healthineers, who own the photon-counting CT used for a portion of this study under the terms of a sponsored research agreement with the Mayo Clinic.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bonneville JF,
    2. Potorac I,
    3. Petrossians P, et al
    . Pituitary MRI in Cushing’s disease: an update. J Neuroendocrinol 2022;34:e13123 doi:10.1111/jne.13123 pmid:35352410
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Friedman TC,
    2. Zuckerbraun E,
    3. Lee ML, et al
    . Dynamic pituitary MRI has high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of mild Cushing’s syndrome and should be part of the initial workup. Horm Metab Res 2007;39:451–56 doi:10.1055/s-2007-980192 pmid:17578763
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bashari WA,
    2. Gillett D,
    3. MacFarlane J, et al
    . Modern imaging in Cushing’s disease. Pituitary 2022;25:709–12 doi:10.1007/s11102-022-01236-w pmid:35666391
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nehra AK,
    2. Rajendran K,
    3. Baffour FI, et al
    . Seeing more with less: clinical benefits of photon-counting detector CT. Radiographics 2023;43:e220158 doi:10.1148/rg.220158 pmid:37022956
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rajendran K,
    2. Petersilka M,
    3. Henning A, et al
    . First clinical photon-counting detector CT system: technical evaluation. Radiology 2022;303:130–38 doi:10.1148/radiol.212579 pmid:34904876
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dane B,
    2. Qian K,
    3. Soni R, et al
    . Crohn’s disease inflammation severity assessment with iodine density from photon counting CT enterography: comparison with endoscopic histopathology. Abdom Radiology (NY) 2023;49:271–78 doi:10.1007/s00261-023-04060-3 pmid:37814149
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Baffour FI,
    2. Glazebrook KN,
    3. Ferrero A, et al
    . Photon-counting detector CT for musculoskeletal imaging: a clinical perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023;220:551–60 doi:10.2214/AJR.22.28418 pmid:36259593
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Madhavan AA,
    2. Yu L,
    3. Brinjikji W, et al
    . Utility of photon-counting detector CT myelography for the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:740–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7887 pmid:37202116
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Benson JC,
    2. Rajendran K,
    3. Lane JI, et al
    . A new frontier in temporal bone imaging: photon-counting detector CT demonstrates superior visualization of critical anatomic structures at reduced radiation dose. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:579–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7452 pmid:35332019
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Bonneville JF,
    2. Cattin F,
    3. Portha C, et al
    . Computed tomographic demonstration of the posterior pituitary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:263–66 doi:10.2214/ajr.146.2.263 pmid:3484573
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Stadnik T,
    2. Spruyt D,
    3. van Binst A, et al
    . Pituitary microadenomas: diagnosis with dynamic serial CT, conventional CT, and T1-weighted MR imaging before and after injection of gadolinium. Eur J Radiol 1994;18:191–98 doi:10.1016/0720-048x(94)90333-6 pmid:7957289
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kinoshita M,
    2. Tanaka H,
    3. Arita H, et al
    . Pituitary-targeted dynamic contrast-enhanced multisection CT for detecting MR imaging-occult functional pituitary microadenoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:904–08 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4220 pmid:25593201
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ntali G,
    2. Asimakopoulou A,
    3. Siamatras T, et al
    . Mortality in Cushing’s syndrome: systematic analysis of a large series with prolonged follow-up. Eur J Endocrinol 2013;169:715–23 doi:10.1530/EJE-13-0569 pmid:23996696
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Lonser RR,
    2. Wind JJ,
    3. Nieman LK, et al
    . Outcome of surgical treatment of 200 children with Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:892–901 doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3604 pmid:23372173
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received December 11, 2023.
  • Accepted after revision January 15, 2024.
  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 45 (6)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 45, Issue 6
1 Jun 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Back to the Future: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT for the Detection of Pituitary Adenoma in Cushing Disease
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Ian T. Mark, Jamie Van Gompel, Irina Bancos, Alex A. Nagelschneider, Derek R. Johnson, Girish Bathla, Ajay A. Madhavan, Nikkole M. Weber, Lifeng Yu
Back to the Future: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Photon-Counting Detector CT for the Detection of Pituitary Adenoma in Cushing Disease
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2024, 45 (6) 743-746; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8171

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Dynamic Photon-Counting CT for Pituitary Adenoma
Ian T. Mark, Jamie Van Gompel, Irina Bancos, Alex A. Nagelschneider, Derek R. Johnson, Girish Bathla, Ajay A. Madhavan, Nikkole M. Weber, Lifeng Yu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2024, 45 (6) 743-746; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8171
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (1)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Estimation of contrast agents using a 2-dimensional photon counting CT detector combined with MPPC and YGAG scintillator array
    Fitri Lucyana, Makoto Arimoto, Daichi Sato, Takahiro Tomoda, Ayumi Ishiguro, Hiroki Kawashima, Kenichiro Okumura, Kazuhiro Murakami, Satoshi Kobayashi, Jun Kataoka, Mayu Sagisaka, Satoshi Shiota, Shinsuke Terazawa
    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 2025 1075

More in this TOC Section

  • Temporal Evolution of Vestibular schwannoma
  • CE MRI for Brain Metastasis Detection
  • ASL Repeatability Reproducibility in Brain Tumors
Show more BRAIN TUMOR IMAGING

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire