This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 1p/19q codeletion is a key genetic marker in gliomas and plays a crucial role in prognosis and treatment decisions. Traditional methods for detecting this genetic alteration rely on invasive tissue biopsies.
PURPOSE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of MRI-derived radiomics-based models to predict glioma 1p/19q codeletion status.
DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted in 4 databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus.
STUDY SELECTION: We selected the studies that assessed the performance of radiomics-based models in determining 1p/19q codeletion status.
DATA ANALYSIS: The Methodological Radiomics Score was used to evaluate study quality. Pooled diagnostic estimates were calculated, and heterogeneity was assessed by using the I2 statistic. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity. Deek’s funnel plot was used to assess publication bias.
DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. A meta-analysis of 10 studies yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67–0.91), specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.70–0.88), positive diagnostic likelihood (DLR) of 4.14 (95% CI, 2.62–6.52), negative DLR of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.12–0.43), diagnostic odds ratio of 18.37 (95% CI, 7.36–45.85), and area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84–0.90). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences based on the country and segmentation method.
LIMITATIONS: Our meta-analysis is limited by small number of studies with external validation cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI-derived radiomics-based models demonstrated good predictive performance for glioma 1p/19q codeletion status, highlighting their potential as a noninvasive tool for glioma characterization and for aiding in treatment decision-making.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- AUC
- area under the curve
- DLR
- diagnostic likelihood ratio
- DOR
- diagnostic OR
- EV
- external validation
- GLCM
- gray-level co-occurrence matrix
- HOIV
- holdout internal validation
- HSROC
- hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic
- IDH
- isocitrate dehydrogenase
- METRICS
- Methodological Radiomics Score
- QUADAS-2
- Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2
- VASARI
- Visually Accessible Rembrandt Images
- © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
ASNR members
Login to the site using your ASNR member credentials








