Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • AJNR Awards
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • AJNR Awards
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR at ASNR25 | Join us at BOOTH 312 and more. Check out our schedule

Research ArticleNeurovascular/Stroke Imaging
Open Access

CT-Based Intrathrombus and Perithrombus Radiomics for Prediction of Prognosis after Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Study across 2 Centers

Minda Li, Jingxuan Jiang, Hongmei Gu, Su Hu, Jingli Wang and Chunhong Hu
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2025, 46 (4) 681-688; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8522
Minda Li
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.L., S.H., C.H.), The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
bDepartment of Radiology (M.L., J.J., H.G.), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Minda Li
Jingxuan Jiang
bDepartment of Radiology (M.L., J.J., H.G.), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
cInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (J.J.), Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hongmei Gu
bDepartment of Radiology (M.L., J.J., H.G.), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Su Hu
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.L., S.H., C.H.), The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
dInstitute of Medical Imaging (H.S., C.H.), Soochow University, Suzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jingli Wang
eStroke Center (J.W.), Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chunhong Hu
aFrom the Department of Radiology (M.L., S.H., C.H.), The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
dInstitute of Medical Imaging (H.S., C.H.), Soochow University, Suzhou, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complications from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) can negatively affect clinical outcomes, making the development of a more precise and objective prediction model essential. This research aimed to assess the effectiveness of radiomics features derived from presurgical CT scans in predicting the prognosis post-EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation included 336 patients with acute ischemic stroke from 2 medical centers from March 2018 to March 2024. The participants were split into a training cohort of 161 patients and a validation cohort of 175 patients. Patient outcomes were rated with the mRS: 0–2 for good, 3–6 for poor. A total of 428 radiomics features were derived from intrathrombus and perithrombus regions in noncontrast CT and CTA images. Feature selection was conducted using a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. The efficacy of 8 different supervised learning models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS: Among all models tested in the validation cohort, the logistic regression algorithm for the combined model achieved the highest AUC (0.87; 95% CI, 0.81–0.92), outperforming other algorithms. The combined use of radiomics features from both the intrathrombus and perithrombus regions significantly enhanced diagnostic accuracy over models using features from a single region (0.81 versus 0.70, 0.77), highlighting the benefit of integrating data from both regions for improved prediction.

CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a combined radiomics model based on CT serves as a potent approach to assessing the prognosis following EVT. The logistic regression model, in particular, proved to be both effective and stable, offering critical insights for the management of stroke.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AUC
area under the curve
EVT
endovascular thrombectomy
KNN
k-nearest neighbors
LASSO
least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
LightGBM
Light Gradient-Boosting Machine
LR
logistic regression
MLP
multilayer perceptron
Rad
radiomics
RF
random forest
SVM
support vector machine
XGBoost
eXtreme Gradient Boosting

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

Prior studies have examined the predictive value of CT-derived thrombus radiomics in stroke, focusing mainly on intrathrombus features for predicting thrombectomy or thrombolysis outcomes. These investigations highlighted the role of CT signs and thrombus properties in prognostication but also revealed limitations due to the reliance on subjective interpretation and a singular focus on intrathrombus analysis.

KEY FINDINGS:

Our study validates a CT-based combined radiomics model using both intrathrombus and perithrombus features, with logistic regression demonstrating the highest predictive accuracy for post-EVT outcomes in stroke.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

The research advances understanding by integrating perithrombus features into predictive modeling, offering a more comprehensive and objective analysis that surpasses traditional evaluations, thereby enhancing stroke-outcome predictions.

Acute ischemic stroke considerably contributes to death, disability, and high morbidity globally, greatly impacting global mortality rates.1 Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard treatment recommended for patients experiencing acute anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion.2,3 However, EVT is associated with certain complications, such as intracranial hemorrhage and malignant brain edema.4⇓⇓⇓–8 The presence of these conditions notably compromises the probability of positive clinical outcomes and elevates the risk of death. Given the heterogeneity of functional outcomes even after a successful procedure, there is an urgent need to both identify patients who are suitable for EVT and predict early poor outcomes. These efforts can subsequently enhance the patient prognosis.

In recent years, certain radiologic signs such as the high-density MCA sign, intracranial high-density areas, large ischemic cores, and mismatch of CT perfusion have been identified as predictors of clinical outcomes.9⇓⇓–12 Although these CT features provide valuable insight, their evaluation depends heavily on the subjective interpretation by radiologists and may not be sufficient for accurate prognosis. Thus, developing a more precise and objective prediction model is essential.

Radiomics analysis offers a quantitative approach by analyzing the variations in gray levels among pixels, allowing a detailed, high-throughput examination of imaging data that surpasses the conventional visual assessments performed by experts. This method holds promise for enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Machine learning models such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and random forest (RF) have proved effective in delivering precise predictions, thus aiding health care professionals in refining stroke management and enhancing patient outcomes.13 Recent progress in CT-derived radiomics, particularly in analyzing thrombus properties, has shown potential in forecasting various clinical outcomes. While previous research has validated the effectiveness of CT-derived thrombus radiomics in determining thrombus age, composition, and origin, as well as predicting outcomes after thrombectomy or thrombolysis treatments, and using a CTA-based thrombus radiomics model to estimate the timing of stroke onset,14⇓⇓⇓–18 these studies have primarily focused on intrathrombus features. There remains a substantial research gap in examining perithrombus areas and their role in predicting clinical outcomes after EVT.

Consequently, this research sought to evaluate the predictive capacity of both intrathrombus and perithrombus radiomics features extracted from CT for clinical outcomes post-EVT. We also aimed to identify the most effective machine learning classifier for this purpose through rigorous statistical analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

This research adhered to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the ethics committees of the participating hospitals and was granted a waiver of informed consent. We performed a retrospective analysis on patients with acute stroke who were admitted to 2 medical centers (A: Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, B: Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) between March 2018 and March 2024. The inclusion criteria were the following: 1) acute stroke resulting from anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion; 2) visible thrombus-related signs on initial NCCT or CTA at admission; 3) an mRS score of <3 before stroke; 4) subsequent immediate EVT; and 5) the availability of comprehensive demographic and clinical data. Criteria for exclusion were inadequate imaging clarity due to motion or metal artifacts and incomplete clinical records. Collected clinical data encompassed age, sex, medical history (including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease), and NIHSS score at admission. In this study, “prognosis” is defined as the clinical outcomes observed 90 days after EVT, as gauged by the mRS. The assessment specifically targets the restitution of motor function and the frequency of major complications. At 90 days, 2 specialized stroke neurologists (J.L.W., J.X.J.) conducted a systematic evaluation of the mRS scores. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to their mRS scores: the good outcome group with mRS scores of <3, and the poor outcome group with mRS scores ranging from 3 to 6. Patients from Center A were assigned to the training cohort, while those from Center B were allocated to the validation cohort. The patient-selection process and analytic pathway are depicted in Fig 1. For further details on the code and model files, please contact the corresponding author via e-mail.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Flow chart of the patient-selection process.

CT Data Acquisition and Thrombus Segmentation

The radiomics process encompassed outlining the ROI, extraction of radiomics features, feature selection, and construction of predictive models (Fig 2). NCCT and CTA were performed using 64- to 256-slice CT scanners from 2 vendors (Somatom Force, Siemens; Revolution CT and Optima CT680, GE Healthcare), with a reconstruction slice thickness between 0.63 and 1.00 mm. Before thrombus segmentation, all CT scans were subject to intensity normalization, adjusting the intensity values to a 0–600 range. The images were also adjusted to a uniform resolution of 1 × 1 × 1 mm to standardize voxel dimensions. Thrombus-associated ROIs were outlined using ITK-SNAP software (Version 3.6.0; http://www.itksnap.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php) referencing DSA images with the method used in our previous study.15 After we segmented the intrathrombus regions, the perithrombus areas were automatically segmented by increasing the radius by 1 mm from the original ROIs using Python (Version 2.7.13). To assess the precision of segmentation, we delineated 30 thrombi selected at random 2 times from CTA scans via 1 radiologist (M.D.L.) within a 2-week period and independently verified by another radiologist (H.M.G.). Both readers were unaware of the patients’ clinical data during the segmentation process.

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

Workflow of the CT-based radiomics model.

Feature Extraction and Selection

Following the delineation of intrathrombus and perithrombus regions, radiomics features were obtained via the PyRadiomics library (https://pypi.org/project/pyradiomic/). From both regions on NCCT and CTA scans, 428 features were derived in total. To normalize these features and reduce variability across variances, we applied z score normalization, scaling the features to a 0–1 range in the training cohort. This normalization process was replicated in the validation data sets as well. Feature selection was performed on the training cohort via the Mann-Whitney U test to screen out redundant radiomics features, keeping only those significant at P < .05. To assess the interfeature relationships, we calculated the Spearman rank correlation coefficients, and only features that demonstrated a correlation coefficient of >0.9 with at least 2 other features were kept. The refined data set was then subjected to the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model to develop a predictive radiomics signature. In this study, we conducted k-fold cross-validation as part of our regularization process, specifically tuning the λ parameter to select features optimally.

Classifier Model Building and Evaluation

For the selection of radiomics features, the maximal relevance and minimum redundancy method followed by the LASSO technique was implemented sequentially. This method ranked radiomics features with an intraclass correlation coefficient of >0.90 on the basis of their relevance-redundancy index. From this ranking, the top 10 features exhibiting the highest relevance were preserved. These chosen features were further refined through the LASSO classifier to pinpoint an optimized subset for model development. A radiomics signature was established via multiple logistic regression, using the selected features, and a radiomics score (Rad score) was computed by summing these features, each weighted by its respective coefficient.

To evaluate the clinical differences between patient groups with and without good outcomes, we performed both univariate and multivariate analyses. Additionally, 8 supervised machine learning algorithms—RF, LR, SVM, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), Extra Trees, Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM; https://lightgbm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)—were used as classifiers. After feature selection through the LASSO method, these features were incorporated into the models, and a 5-fold cross-validation strategy was adopted to confirm the final radiomics signature. The DeLong test was used to statistically assess differences in predictive performance among the radiomics models (intrathrombus, perithrombus, and combined models). The CheckList for EvaluAtion of Radiomics study (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37142815/) served as the guideline for standardized reporting in this radiomics research. The optimal classification algorithm was identified to develop a clinical prediction model that incorporates selected clinical variables.

Statistical Analysis

Clinical characteristics were evaluated via the t test, Mann-Whitney U test, or χ2 test as appropriate. To analyze the correlations among features, we used the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, retaining those features with a coefficient of >0.9. The consistency of the ROI delineation was verified using the intraclass correlation coefficient, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of >0.75 indicating strong reliability. The efficacy of the predictive models post-EVT was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the DeLong test for variations. A P value < .05 was statistically significant. To mitigate type I errors from multiple comparisons, we used false discovery rate corrections in our analysis.

We hereby present this article following the STARD reporting checklist (Supplemental Data).

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

In our study, 336 patients with stroke were carefully chosen on the basis of defined criteria; 128 (38.1%) were assessed as having a poor outcome following EVT. The study divided these patients into 2 cohorts: The study group comprised 161 from Center A as the training group and 175 from Center B as the validation group. The Table provides a detailed summary of the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, categorized on the basis of the outcome after EVT for both the training and validation groups. The analysis showed no significant statistical differences in sex, age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking habits, coronary heart disease, or NIHSS scores between the good outcome and poor outcome groups across both cohorts. However, a notable statistical difference was found in the incidence of atrial fibrillation between the groups. No statistically significant variance was observed when comparing the 2 cohorts.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Baseline demographic characteristics and clinical variables of enrolled patients

Feature Extraction and Selection

The intraclass correlation coefficient values demonstrated strong agreement (0.75–0.90) for the radiomics features. After we confirmed this consistency, all pertinent radiomics features were extracted and used to build predictive models. Ultimately, the Rad scores were formulated using 6, 12, and 15 features, with nonzero coefficients for the intrathrombus, perithrombus, and combined models, respectively, as shown in Fig 3. Detailed information on the chosen radiomics features can be found in the Supplemental Data. All selected radiomics features originated from CTA images, with no features being chosen from NCCT images.

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Radiomics feature-selection based on the LASSO algorithm and Rad score based on intrathrombus (A), perithrombus (B), and combined regions (C). Details of selected radiomic features are in the supplementary materials.

Performance and Comparison of Models

The performance of 8 classifiers—LR, SVM, KNN, RF, Extra Trees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and MLP—was assessed in both the training and validation cohorts. The results are detailed in the Supplemental Data and Fig 4.

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

In the training (A) and validation (B) cohorts, the 8 classifiers including the LR, SVM, KNN, RF, extra trees, XGBoost, LightGBM, and MLP obtained AUCs for the models, respectively. In the validation cohort, the AUC range of each model based on intrathrombus regions is 0.61–0.70. Based on perithrombus regions, it is 0.74–0.87, and on combined regions, it is 0.74–0.90 (C).

In the evaluation of models for the intrathrombus, perithrombus, and combined regions, XGBoost consistently outperformed other algorithms in the training cohort. However, it experienced a noticeable decline in performance when evaluated on the validation cohort. KNN, LightGBM, and RF showed performance similar to that of XGBoost. LR performed slightly lower in the training cohort compared with these models and was relatively stable but excelled in the validation cohort.

Within the intrathrombus models of the validation cohort, LR achieved the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.62–0.78), showing statistically significant differences compared with XGBoost (P = .03), RF (P = .03), and KNN (P = .01), exhibiting no statistically significant disparities compared with LightGBM (P = .26), Extra Trees (P = .97), MLP (P = .36), and SVM (P = .13). For the perithrombus models, LR exhibited the greatest AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73–0.87), demonstrating statistically significant distinctions compared with Extra Trees (P = .002), LightGBM (P = .04), MLP (P = .03), and SVM (P = .01), whereas it did not differ significantly from RF (P = .18), XGBoost (P = .05), and KNN (P = .60). In the combined regions, the LR model reached an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81–0.92) and was statistically different compared with Extra Trees (P = .01), KNN (P = .02), RF (P = .01), XGBoost (P < .001), LightGBM (P < .001), MLP (P = .01), and SVM (P = .01).

Furthermore, in the validation cohort, the diagnostic capability of the LR model using the combined regions significantly surpassed that of both the intrathrombus (P < .001) and perithrombus models (P = .01). However, no significant difference in diagnostic performance was observed between the intrathrombus and perithrombus models (P = .05).

We integrated clinical parameters into an LR radiomics model but observed no significant predictive gains in the validation cohort (P > .05). An exclusively clinical LR model has also been formulated. The receiver operating characteristic curves for all 3 models can be examined in the Supplemental Data.

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective analysis, our aim was to use radiomics features derived from intrathrombus and perithrombus regions on CT to forecast prognosis following EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. A substantial gap exists in the current research regarding the use of thrombus-related radiomics for predicting clinical outcomes following EVT, especially in perithrombotic areas, because some studies focused on recanalization following EVT.13,17 Our study developed and validated a radiomics model that uses features from both intrathrombus and perithrombus regions to estimate the prognosis after EVT. We used 8 different classifiers to determine which models offer robust diagnostic effectiveness and superior generalization capabilities. Among these, the LR model using combined radiomics features proved to be the most precise in predicting outcomes.

Prior research has shown that the duration of thrombectomy and the frequency of interventions can influence the long-term outcomes in patients.19,20 There is also evidence suggesting a relationship between the structural composition of the thrombus and the number and duration of EVT procedures.21,22 Variables like the use of stent retrievers, thrombotic makeup, and the number of thrombectomy sessions might lead to varying extents of vascular trauma in patients with acute ischemic stroke,23,24 indicating that thrombus composition could be a critical factor in forecasting prognosis post-EVT. In this study, we constructed a combined model using 15 selected radiomics features derived solely from CTA, which included 9 features from intrathrombus regions and 6 from perithrombus regions. Our analysis revealed that radiomics features from both intra- and perithrombus regions have potent predictive capabilities, particularly those from perithrombus areas. In the validation cohort, radiomics from the perithrombus areas notably enhanced the prognosis post-EVT over features from intrathrombus regions alone. On the basis of prior research25,26 and actual measurements of vessel wall thickness on high-resolution MR images, we defined the perithrombus region as extending 1 mm outward from the thrombus boundary. The perithrombotic region, which includes structures like the vessel wall and perivascular fat, may offer predictive insights into the disruption of the BBB associated with a heightened risk of complications, aligning with previous findings.27,28 Given that BBB disruption is commonly observed post-EVT and is linked to an increased risk of complications,27,29 radiomics features from perithrombus regions could serve as crucial predictors of clinical outcomes post-EVT. Using information from both regions significantly improves diagnostic performance, surpassing that of models using only intra- or perithrombus data, underscoring the value of integrating data from both regions for enhanced prediction accuracy.

The selection of classifiers is pivotal to the effectiveness of predictive models, yet there remains no universal standard guiding this choice, leading researchers to rely on personal preference and experience.30 Consequently, this study assessed and compared 8 different machine learning classifiers. The findings indicated that the LR model was consistently more effective than the others in both training and validation cohorts, particularly when analyzing combined radiomics features, achieving the highest AUC across all classifiers. LR was favored over complex models for its statistical simplicity, interpretability, and robust performance for binary classification tasks associated with lesser risks of overfitting.15,31,32 Given the scope and nature of our data, we believed that a parsimonious model like LR would be more appropriate. Complex models like SVM, MLP, RF, Extra Trees, XGBoost, KNN, and LightGBM, despite their high-dimensional data-handling and robustness, were prone to overfitting without substantial data and careful tuning. The notable decline in the validation performance of XGBoost highlighted the overfitting risk and the need for a balance between model complexity and generalizability. The consistent validation cohort performance of LR affirmed its suitability and reliability for clinical diagnostics, justifying its choice due to effective generalization as demonstrated across data sets.

In this study, except for atrial fibrillation, no clinical variables exhibited statistically significant differences between the good outcome and poor outcome groups in either the training or validation cohorts. Notably, a significant difference in the occurrence of atrial fibrillation between the good outcome and poor outcome groups was identified, in contrast to other studies that found no significant differences.31,33,34 This inconsistency can be explained by variations in data arrangement and the sample sizes involved in our research. To further understand these discrepancies, additional research with larger sample sizes is recommended. The combined model did not demonstrably enhance predictive performance over the radiomics-only model, suggesting a greater reliance on superior-performing radiomics features rather than clinical variables.

This study has several notable limitations. First, the patient sample size is relatively small, which may impact the stability of the outcomes of the machine learning model; applying these models to larger data sets could potentially provide more robust results. Second, the thrombus-segmentation process was manually conducted, which could be time-consuming and might compromise the reliability of the results. Future research should focus on developing automated or semiautomated methods for more efficient and accurate thrombus segmentation. Third, we sourced training and validation cohorts from separate centers, and despite image calibration and cross-validation efforts, potential bias may exist. Last, even with cross-validation and regularization techniques, overfitting is a challenge in high-dimensional data like ours. Future studies need to encompass more centers and larger samples to validate our findings with external data.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated a CT-based radiomics model to evaluate the prognosis following EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This model could provide critical insights for clinical decision-making and outcome prediction. The analysis showed varied performance across different thrombus regions and classifiers, with models that combined features from multiple regions proving most effective. Specifically, the LR models exhibited high efficacy and stability in predicting clinical outcome.

Footnotes

  • Minda Li and Jingxuan Jiang contribute equally to this work.

  • This study was supported by the Jiangsu Province Capability Improvement Project through Science, Technology, and Education (Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline Cultivation Unit, JSDW202242) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Youth Program, Grant No. 82402364).

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 2019;18:439–58 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1 pmid:30879893
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sarraj A,
    2. Hassan AE,
    3. Abraham MG, et al
    ; SELECT2 Investigators. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1259–71 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214403 pmid:36762865
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Yoshimura S,
    2. Sakai N,
    3. Yamagami H, et al
    . Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1303–13 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118191 pmid:35138767
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Wang H, et al
    . Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in Chinese ischemic stroke patients: the ASIAN score. Stroke 2020;51:2690–96 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030173 pmid:32811387
    CrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Zi W,
    2. Qiu Z,
    3. Li F, et al
    ; DEVT Trial Investigators. Effect of endovascular treatment alone vs intravenous alteplase plus endovascular treatment on functional independence in patients with acute ischemic stroke: the DEVT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325:234–43 doi:10.1001/jama.2020.23523 pmid:33464335
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Harker P,
    2. Aziz YN,
    3. Vranic J, et al
    . Asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following endovascular stroke therapy is not benign: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2024;13:e031749 doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.031749 pmid:38348800
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Huang X,
    2. Yang Q,
    3. Shi X, et al
    . Predictors of malignant brain edema after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:994–98 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014650 pmid:30798266
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Thorén M,
    2. Dixit A,
    3. Escudero-Martínez I, et al
    . Effect of recanalization on cerebral edema in ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis and/or endovascular therapy. Stroke 2020;51:216–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026692 pmid:31818228
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Merlino G,
    2. Tereshko Y,
    3. Pez S, et al
    . Hyperdense middle cerebral artery sign predicts favorable outcome in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2023;55:312–21 doi:10.1007/s11239-022-02731-4 pmid:36434302
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lu ZJ,
    2. Lai JX,
    3. Huang JR, et al
    . Predictive value of intracranial high-density areas in neurological function. World J Psychiatry 2024;14:1080–86 doi:10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1080 pmid:39050205
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Beyeler M,
    2. Pohle F,
    3. Weber L, et al
    . Long-term effect of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients according to advanced imaging characteristics. Clin Neuroradiol 2024;34:105–14 doi:10.1007/s00062-023-01337-4 pmid:37642685
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Olivot JM,
    2. Albucher JF,
    3. Guenego A, et al
    ; FRAME Investigator. Mismatch profile influences outcome after mechanical thrombectomy. Stroke 2021;52:232–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031929 pmid:33349010
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Xiong X,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Ke J, et al
    . Radiomics-based intracranial thrombus features on preoperative noncontrast CT predicts successful recanalization of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2023;13:682–94 doi:10.21037/qims-22-599 pmid:36819277
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Li T,
    3. Jia Z, et al
    . Radiomics features on computed tomography reflect thrombus histological age prior to endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2023;32:107358 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107358 pmid:37716105
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Wei J,
    3. Zhu Y, et al
    . Clot-based radiomics model for cardioembolic stroke prediction with CT imaging before recanalization: a multicenter study. Eur Radiol 2023;33:970–80 doi:10.1007/s00330-022-09116-4 pmid:36066731
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Hang Y,
    3. Cao Y, et al
    . A nomogram for predicting thrombus composition in stroke patients with large vessel occlusion: combination of thrombus density and perviousness with clinical features. Neuroradiology 2023;65:371–80 doi:10.1007/s00234-022-03046-0 pmid:36064806
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Qiu W,
    2. Kuang H,
    3. Nair J, et al
    . Radiomics-based intracranial thrombus features on CT and CTA predict recanalization with intravenous alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:39–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5918 pmid:30573458
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Cheng Y,
    2. Wan S,
    3. Wu W, et al
    . Computed tomography angiography-based thrombus radiomics for predicting the time since stroke onset. Acad Radiol 2023;30:2469–76 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.032 pmid:36697269
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Alawieh A,
    2. Vargas J,
    3. Fargen KM, et al
    . Impact of procedure time on outcomes of thrombectomy for stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:879–90 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.052 pmid:30819354
    FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Bourcier R,
    2. Saleme S,
    3. Labreuche J, et al
    ; ASTER Trial Investigators. More than three passes of stent retriever is an independent predictor of parenchymal hematoma in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:625–29 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014380 pmid:30389897
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Abbasi M,
    2. Arturo Larco J,
    3. Mereuta MO, et al
    . Diverse thrombus composition in thrombectomy stroke patients with longer time to recanalization. Thromb Res 2022;209:99–104 doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2021.11.018 pmid:34906857
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Maekawa K,
    2. Shibata M,
    3. Nakajima H, et al
    . Erythrocyte-rich thrombus is associated with reduced number of maneuvers and procedure time in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2018;8:39–49 doi:10.1159/000486042 pmid:29402828
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Funatsu N,
    2. Hayakawa M,
    3. Hashimoto T, et al
    . Vascular wall components in thrombi obtained by acute stroke thrombectomy: clinical significance and related factors. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:232–36 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014041 pmid:30097483
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Koge J,
    2. Kato S,
    3. Hashimoto T, et al
    . Vessel wall injury after stent retriever thrombectomy for internal carotid artery occlusion with duplicated middle cerebral artery. World Neurosurg 2019;123:54–58 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.223 pmid:30529524
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Obusez EC,
    2. Hui F,
    3. Hajj-Ali RA, et al
    . High-resolution MRI vessel wall imaging: spatial and temporal patterns of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1527–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3909 pmid:24722305
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Zhu C,
    2. Haraldsson H,
    3. Tian B, et al
    . High resolution imaging of the intracranial vessel wall at 3 and 7 T using 3D fast spin echo MRI. MAGMA 2016;29:559–70 doi:10.1007/s10334-016-0531-x pmid:26946509
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hom J,
    2. Dankbaar JW,
    3. Soares BP, et al
    . Blood-brain barrier permeability assessed by perfusion CT predicts symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation and malignant edema in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:41–48 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2244 pmid:20947643
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Renú A,
    2. Laredo C,
    3. Lopez-Rueda A, et al
    . Vessel wall enhancement and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier disruption after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2017;48:651–57 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015648 pmid:28174330
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Shi ZS,
    2. Duckwiler GR,
    3. Jahan R, et al
    . Early blood-brain barrier disruption after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. J Neuroimaging 2018;28:283–88 doi:10.1111/jon.12504 pmid:29484769
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gu H,
    2. Zhang X,
    3. di Russo P, et al
    . The current state of radiomics for meningiomas: promises and challenges. Front Oncol 2020;10:567736 doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.567736 pmid:33194649
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Xie G,
    2. Li T,
    3. Ren Y, et al
    . Radiomics-based infarct features on CT predict hemorrhagic transformation in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Front Neurosci 2022;16:1002717 doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.1002717 pmid:36213752
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bisaso KR,
    2. Karungi SA,
    3. Kiragga A, et al
    . A comparative study of logistic regression based machine learning techniques for prediction of early virological suppression in antiretroviral initiating HIV patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018;18:77 doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0659-x pmid:30180893
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. van Kranendonk KR,
    2. Treurniet KM,
    3. Boers AM, et al
    ; MR CLEAN Investigators. Clinical and imaging markers associated with hemorrhagic transformation in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2019;50:2037–43 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024255 pmid:33755497
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Chen XY,
    3. Wang HY, et al
    . Hemodynamic predictors of early neurological deterioration and clinical outcome after endovascular treatment in large artery occlusion. Heliyon 2024;10:e24746 doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24746 pmid:38318012
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received August 1, 2024.
  • Accepted after revision September 30, 2024.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 46 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 46, Issue 4
1 Apr 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CT-Based Intrathrombus and Perithrombus Radiomics for Prediction of Prognosis after Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Study across 2 Centers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Minda Li, Jingxuan Jiang, Hongmei Gu, Su Hu, Jingli Wang, Chunhong Hu
CT-Based Intrathrombus and Perithrombus Radiomics for Prediction of Prognosis after Endovascular Thrombectomy: A Retrospective Study across 2 Centers
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2025, 46 (4) 681-688; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8522

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Radiomics Predict Outcomes in Thrombectomy
Minda Li, Jingxuan Jiang, Hongmei Gu, Su Hu, Jingli Wang, Chunhong Hu
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2025, 46 (4) 681-688; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8522
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • DMV, IFS and CSVD burden
  • Thrombectomy for large stroke and limited penumbra
  • CTP Postprocessing Tools in MDVO Stroke
Show more NEUROVASCULAR/STROKE IMAGING

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire