Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Quality, Safety, and Value Special Collection
    • ASFNR Stroke Perfusion Special Collection
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Author Policies
    • Peer-Review Policy
    • Transparency in Authorship Policy
    • Conflict-of-Interest Policy
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Quality, Safety, and Value Special Collection
    • ASFNR Stroke Perfusion Special Collection
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Author Policies
    • Peer-Review Policy
    • Transparency in Authorship Policy
    • Conflict-of-Interest Policy
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Check out our Case Collections, Special Collections, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleSPINE
Open Access

Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations

W. Brinjikji, P.H. Luetmer, B. Comstock, B.W. Bresnahan, L.E. Chen, R.A. Deyo, S. Halabi, J.A. Turner, A.L. Avins, K. James, J.T. Wald, D.F. Kallmes and J.G. Jarvik
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4173
W. Brinjikji
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.H. Luetmer
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Comstock
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B.W. Bresnahan
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.E. Chen
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R.A. Deyo
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Halabi
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.A. Turner
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.L. Avins
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. James
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.T. Wald
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.F. Kallmes
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.G. Jarvik
From the Department of Radiology (W.B., P.H.L., J.T.W., D.F.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Departments of Biostatistics (B.C.), Radiology (B.C., B.W.B., L.E.C., K.J., J.G.J.), Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (J.A.T.), and Neurological Surgery and Health Services (J.G.J.), Comparative Effectiveness Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences (R.A.D.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Radiology (S.H.), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan; Department of Radiology (A.L.A.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and Division of Research (A.L.A.), Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Degenerative changes are commonly found in spine imaging but often occur in pain-free individuals as well as those with back pain. We sought to estimate the prevalence, by age, of common degenerative spine conditions by performing a systematic review studying the prevalence of spine degeneration on imaging in asymptomatic individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review of articles reporting the prevalence of imaging findings (CT or MR imaging) in asymptomatic individuals from published English literature through April 2014. Two reviewers evaluated each manuscript. We selected age groupings by decade (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 years), determining age-specific prevalence estimates. For each imaging finding, we fit a generalized linear mixed-effects model for the age-specific prevalence estimate clustering in the study, adjusting for the midpoint of the reported age interval.

RESULTS: Thirty-three articles reporting imaging findings for 3110 asymptomatic individuals met our study inclusion criteria. The prevalence of disk degeneration in asymptomatic individuals increased from 37% of 20-year-old individuals to 96% of 80-year-old individuals. Disk bulge prevalence increased from 30% of those 20 years of age to 84% of those 80 years of age. Disk protrusion prevalence increased from 29% of those 20 years of age to 43% of those 80 years of age. The prevalence of annular fissure increased from 19% of those 20 years of age to 29% of those 80 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS: Imaging findings of spine degeneration are present in high proportions of asymptomatic individuals, increasing with age. Many imaging-based degenerative features are likely part of normal aging and unassociated with pain. These imaging findings must be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical condition.

  • © 2015 American Society of Neuroradiology

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

Next
Back to top
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
W. Brinjikji, P.H. Luetmer, B. Comstock, B.W. Bresnahan, L.E. Chen, R.A. Deyo, S. Halabi, J.A. Turner, A.L. Avins, K. James, J.T. Wald, D.F. Kallmes, J.G. Jarvik
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2014, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4173

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations
W. Brinjikji, P.H. Luetmer, B. Comstock, B.W. Bresnahan, L.E. Chen, R.A. Deyo, S. Halabi, J.A. Turner, A.L. Avins, K. James, J.T. Wald, D.F. Kallmes, J.G. Jarvik
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2014, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4173
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 'Harm? I dont think so!: medical overuse from the perspective of allied health professionals in Germany - a qualitative study
  • Granulocytic sarcoma: a rare cause of sciatica
  • From strength to stability: Proposal for a changed perspective on the mechanisms of musculoskeletal complaints and non-contact injuries--a synthesizing reconsideration of previously collected data on muscular holding capacity
  • Health anxiety in a neurological setting
  • Degenerative Disc Disease in Young Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Evaluating musculoskeletal imaging communication interventions using behavioural science: a scoping review using the COM-B model
  • Robust radiomic signatures of intervertebral disc degeneration from MRI
  • Understanding the comorbidities among psychiatric disorders, chronic low-back pain, and spinal degenerative disease using observational and genetically informed analyses
  • Commonly used interventional procedures for non-cancer chronic spine pain: a clinical practice guideline
  • Higher Brain Grey Matter Density in Mild to Moderate Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
  • Vitamin B12 deficiency presenting as neck pain and cervical radiculopathy
  • Establishing a Gold Standard for Noninvasive Identification of Painful Lumbar Discs: Prospective Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy vs Low-Pressure Provocation Discography
  • Are We Finally Ready for Total Joint Replacement of the Spine? An Extension of Charnleys Vision
  • Concordance of shoulder symptoms and imaging findings: a protocol for the Finnish Imaging of Shoulder (FIMAGE) study
  • Characterising the interventions designed to affect the reporting of musculoskeletal imaging: a scoping review protocol using the COM-B model
  • The predictive role of pain catastrophising following genicular arterial embolisation for the treatment of mild and moderate knee osteoarthritis
  • Understanding how patients pain beliefs influence chronic low back pain management in Ghana: a grounded theory approach
  • Symptom descriptors and patterns in lumbar radicular pain caused by disc herniation: a 1-year longitudinal cohort study
  • Incidence, prevalence and risk factors for low back pain in adolescent athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Patients self-reported medical care for low back pain: a nationwide population-based study
  • Evaluating the incidence of spinal cord injury after spinal cord stimulator implant: an updated retrospective review
  • Efficacy of the Gelstix nucleus augmentation device for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain: protocol for a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, multicentre trial
  • Characteristics and Effectiveness of Interventions That Target the Reporting, Communication, or Clinical Interpretation of Lumbar Imaging Findings: A Systematic Review
  • Prospective, population-based study of occupational movements and postures of the neck as risk factors for cervical disc herniation
  • 'Scan-negative cauda equina syndrome: what to do when there is no neurosurgical cause
  • Response to: 'Frequency of MRI changes suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis in the axial in a large population-based cohort of individuals aged <45 years by Parperis
  • Clinical management of acute low back pain in elite and subelite rowers: a Delphi study of experienced and expert clinicians
  • Which biopsychosocial factors are associated with the development of chronic musculoskeletal pain? Protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews
  • Taking patients to the ice cream shop but telling them that they cannot have ice cream: a qualitative study of orthopaedic spine clinicians perceptions of persistent low back pain consultations
  • Consumer understanding of terms used in imaging reports requested for low back pain: a cross-sectional survey
  • Patient, Provider, and Clinic Characteristics Associated with Opioid and Non-Opioid Pain Prescriptions for Patients Receiving Low Back Imaging in Primary Care
  • Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care
  • Infographic. When is abnormal normal? Reframing MRI abnormalities as a normal part of ageing
  • Chronic Low Back Pain Occurring in Association With Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome
  • Do not routinely offer imaging for uncomplicated low back pain
  • Protocol for disease-oriented Russian disc degeneration study (RuDDS) biobank facilitating functional omics studies of lumbar disc degeneration
  • Low back pain in compensated Australian workers: a retrospective cohort study
  • Recognising and explaining functional neurological disorder
  • Biomechanical risk factors of lower back pain in cricket fast bowlers using inertial measurement units: a prospective and retrospective investigation
  • VAST Clinical Trial: Safely Supplementing Tissue Lost to Degenerative Disc Disease
  • Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis features on magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic uninjured adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Non-pharmacological treatment of low back pain in primary care
  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies genetic locus on chromosome 9 associated with Modic changes
  • Thoracolumbar intervertebral disc area morphometry in elderly Chinese men and women: radiographic quantifications at baseline and changes at year-4 follow-up
  • Effectiveness of implementing a best practice primary healthcare model for low back pain (BetterBack) compared with current routine care in the Swedish context: an internal pilot study informed protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 2 trial
  • Red flag screening for low back pain: nothing to see here, move along: a narrative review
  • Poor overall quality of clinical practice guidelines for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review
  • Clinician, patient and general public beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis
  • [18F]-Sodium Fluoride PET MR-Based Localization and Quantification of Bone Turnover as a Biomarker for Facet Joint-Induced Disability
  • Pain in elite athletes--neurophysiological, biomechanical and psychosocial considerations: a narrative review
  • Prospective Comparison of Changes in Lumbar Spine MRI Findings over Time between Individuals with Acute Low Back Pain and Controls: An Exploratory Study
  • Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain
  • It is time to stop causing harm with inappropriate imaging for low back pain
  • Granulocytic sarcoma: a rare cause of sciatica
  • The diagnostic dartboard: is the bullseye a correct pathoanatomical diagnosis or to guide treatment?
  • Age- and Level-Dependence of Fatty Infiltration in Lumbar Paravertebral Muscles of Healthy Volunteers
  • Surgery and physical therapy likely yield similar outcomes in spinal stenosis
  • Return to sport after open and microdiscectomy surgery versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review with meta-analysis
  • MRI Findings of Disc Degeneration are More Prevalent in Adults with Low Back Pain than in Asymptomatic Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Recognizing and reducing cognitive bias in clinical and forensic neurology
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • CT-Guided C2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache: Case Series and Clinical Outcomes
  • The Evaluation and Prediction of Laminoplasty Surgery Outcome in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Using Diffusion Tensor MRI
  • Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery
Show more Spine

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Peer-Review Policy
  • Transparency in Authorship Policy
  • Conflict-of-Interest Policy
  • News and Updates
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire