Usefulness of Silent MR Angiography for Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with a Flow-Diverter Device

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Nelson PK,
   3. Lylyk P,
   4. Szikora I, et al

   . The Pipeline Embolization Device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:34–40 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2421 pmid:21148256

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Becske T,
   3. Kallmes DF,
   4. Saatci I, et al

   . Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2013;267:858–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 pmid:23418004

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Kallmes DF,
   3. Hanel R,
   4. Lopes D, et al

   . International retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Liu JM,
   3. Zhou Y,
   4. Li Y, et al

   ; PARAT investigators. Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the Tubridge Flow Diverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:807–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5619 pmid:29599173

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Keskin F,
   3. Erdi F,
   4. Kaya B, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms by Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience. Neurol Res 2015;37:359–65 doi:10.1197/1743132814Y.0000000450 pmid:25310354

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Lubicz B,
   3. Van der Elst O,
   4. Collignon L, et al

   . Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:542–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4143 pmid:25376806

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Ferns SP,
   3. Sprengers ME,
   4. van Rooij WJ, et al

   . Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke 2009;40:e523–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553099 pmid:19520984

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Kanaan H,
   3. Jankowitz B,
   4. Aleu A, et al

   . In-stent thrombosis and stenosis after neck-remodeling device-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2010;67:1523–32; discussion 1532–33 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181f8d194 pmid:21107183

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Mocco J,
   3. Fargen KM,
   4. Albuquerque FC, et al

   . Delayed thrombosis or stenosis following Enterprise-assisted stent-coiling: is it safe? Midterm results of the interstate collaboration of Enterprise stent coiling. Neurosurgery 2011;69:908–13; discussion 913–14 doi:10.1227NEU.0b013e318228490c pmid:21670718

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Marseglia M, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 2015;28:365–75 doi:10.1177/1971400915602803 pmid:26314872e

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Agid R,
    3. Schaaf M,
    4. Farb R

    . CE-MRA for follow-up of aneurysms post stent-assisted coiling. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:275–83 doi:10.1177/159101991201800305 pmid:22958765

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Boddu SR,
    3. Tong FC,
    4. Dehkharghani S, et al

    . Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MRA for follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2112–18 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4008 pmid:24994828

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Penfield JG,
    3. Reilly RF

    . Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk: is there a difference between gadolinium-based contrast agents? Semin Dial 2008;21:129–34 doi:10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00408.x pmid:18225999

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Cho WS,
    3. Kim SS,
    4. Lee SJ, et al

    . The effectiveness of 3T time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up evaluations after the stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. Acta Radiol 2014;55:604–13 doi:10.1177/0284185113502335 pmid:24003259

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Cho YD,
    3. Kim KM,
    4. Lee WJ, et al

    . Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of coil embolization with Enterprise stent for intracranial aneurysm: usefulness of source images. Korean J Radiol 2014;15:161–68 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.1.161 pmid:24497808

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Irie R,
    3. Suzuki M,
    4. Yamamoto M, et al

    . Assessing bold flow in an intracranial stent: a feasibility study of MR angiography using a Silent scan after stent-assisted coil embolization for anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:967–70 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4199 pmid:25523588

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Takano N,
    3. Suzuki M,
    4. Irie R, et al

    . Usefulness of non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using a Silent scan for follow-up after Y-configuration stent-assisted coil embolization for basilar tip aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:577–81 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5033 pmmid:28007767 pmid:28007767

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Takano N,
    3. Suzuki M,
    4. Irie R, et al

    . Non-contrast-enhanced Silent scan MR angiography of intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms treated with a low-profile visualized intraluminal support device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1610–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5223 pmid:28522664

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Attali J,
    3. Benaissa A,
    4. Soize S, et al

    . Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:81–86 doi:10.1136//neurintsurg-2014-011449 pmid:253525582

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Patzig M,
    3. Forbrig R,
    4. Ertl L, et al

    . Intracranial aneurysms treated by flow-diverting stents: long-term follow-up with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017;40:1713–22 doi:10.1007/s00270-017-1732-z pmid:28685380

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Benaissa A,
    3. Tomas C,
    4. Clarençon F, et al

    . Retrospective analysis of delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage after flow-diverter treatment: presentation of a retrospective multicenter trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:475–80 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4561 pmid:26514605

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    2. Cruz JP,
    3. Chow M,
    4. O'Kelly C, et al

    . Delayed ipsilateral parenchymal hemorrhage following flow diversion for the treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:60–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3065 pmid:22403783

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Kulcsár Z,
    3. Houdart E,
    4. Bonafe A, et al

    . Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:20–25 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2370 pmid:21071538

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Alibek S,
    3. Vogel M,
    4. Sun W, et al

    . Acoustic noise reduction in MRI using Silent Scan: an initial experience. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20:360–63 doi:10.5152/dir.2014.13458 pmid:24808439

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Renard D,
    3. Le Bars E,
    4. Arquizan C, et al

    . Time-of-flight MR angiography in cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Acta Neurol Belg 2017;117:837–40 doi:10.1007/s13760-017-0835-2 pmid:28936607

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Wall A,
    3. Kugel H,
    4. Bachman R, et al

    . 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:772–79 doi:10.1002/jmri.20445 pmid:16270296

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Truong TN,
    4. Yen C, et al

    . Quantitative evaluation of susceptibility and shielding effects of nitinol, platinum, cobalt-alloy, and stainless steel stents. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:972–76 doi:10.1002mrm.10450 pmid:12704782

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Majoie CB,
    3. Sprengers ME,
    4. van Rooij WJ, et al

    . MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1349–56 pmid:15956496

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    2. Wallace RC,
    3. Karis JP,
    4. Partovi S, et al

    . Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part 1: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001–08 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0662 pmid:17569946

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Choi JW,
    3. Roh HG,
    4. Moon WJ, et al

    ; Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA on 3.0T: a non-invasive follow-up technique after stent-assisted coil embolization of the intracranial aneurysm. Korean J Radiol 2011;12:662–70 doi:10.3348/kjr.2011.12.6.662 pmid:22043147

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Leucking H,
    3. Engelhorn T,
    4. Lang S, et al

    . FRED flow diverter: a study on safety and efficacy in a consecutive group of 50 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:596–02 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5052 pmid:28104636

    Abstract/FREE Full Text