Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Quality, Safety, and Value Special Collection
    • ASFNR Stroke Perfusion Special Collection
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Author Policies
    • Peer-Review Policy
    • Transparency in Authorship Policy
    • Conflict-of-Interest Policy
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Quality, Safety, and Value Special Collection
    • ASFNR Stroke Perfusion Special Collection
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Author Policies
    • Peer-Review Policy
    • Transparency in Authorship Policy
    • Conflict-of-Interest Policy
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

Check out our Case Collections, Special Collections, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleSPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS
Open Access

Irregular Cervicothoracic Nerve Sheaths on Digital Subtraction Myelography: A CSF Venous Fistula Mimic

Asmita Patel, Jared Verdoorn, Ajay A. Madhavan, John Benson, Waleed Brinjikji, Ben Johnson-Tesch, Parnian Habibi and Ian T. Mark
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8892
Asmita Patel
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jared Verdoorn
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jared Verdoorn
Ajay A. Madhavan
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ajay A. Madhavan
John Benson
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John Benson
Waleed Brinjikji
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Waleed Brinjikji
Ben Johnson-Tesch
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Parnian Habibi
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian T. Mark
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian T. Mark
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Graphical Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) can be caused by CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs), which often require a specialized lateral decubitus examination such as digital subtraction myelography (DSM) for diagnosis. DSM interpretations can be confounded by irregular nerve sheath diverticula at the cervicothoracic junction, potentially mimicking a true CVF. This study aimed to characterize anatomic variations of nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction, in an effort to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 35 patients with low-risk Bern scores who were negative for CVF on DSM. Nerve sheaths at C6–C7, C7–T1, and T1–T2 were classified as normal (<5 mm), elongated linear (≥5 mm), linear-bulbous, linear-branching, or diverticulum. Results were obtained on both the left and right side for each patient.

RESULTS: Data were obtained for 34 patients. Among these, 74% (25/34) demonstrated at least 1 variant nerve sheath configuration. The most common site of variation was C7–T1 on the right (seen in 55%, 18/33), and the most frequent morphologic variant overall was an elongated linear sheath (28/198 levels; 40% of all variants).

CONCLUSIONS: Nerve sheath morphology at the cervicothoracic junction is frequently irregular, and these variants can resemble a CVF on DSM. Recognizing such normal anatomic variations is essential to avoid unwarranted interventions for suspected CVF in patients evaluated for SIH.

ABBREVIATIONS:

CVF
CSF-venous fistula
DSM
digital subtraction myelography
SIH
spontaneous intracranial hypotension

SUMMARY

PREVIOUS LITERATURE:

Prior studies have described the use of digital subtraction myelography (DSM) for the identification of CSF-venous fistulas (CVF). As more centers start to perform these procedures, it’s important for proceduralists to be aware of myelographic pitfalls that can mimic CVF.

KEY FINDINGS:

We found that 74% of patients who underwent DSM, without CVF, had irregular nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction.

KNOWLEDGE ADVANCEMENT:

The irregular appearance of nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction are a typical finding and should not be confused for a CVF.

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) is a potentially debilitating disease requiring extensive work-up and cost, not only financial, but that of time, energy, and effort on both the part of the patient and the health care providers.1,2 Though cost can vary widely, the basics of work-up can include an MRI of the brain and likely spine, lumbar puncture, myelography, and potentially epidural blood patch,3 each of which result in a substantial time, financial, and mental-health burden. A cohort of 64 patients studied in the United Kingdom found that more than one-half of patients had to amend work duties due to SIH, two-thirds of patients reported that their condition affected their financial health, and more than one-quarter of patients reported losing their job.4 Furthermore, in a cohort of 234 patients with SIH, nearly one-half scored within the moderate depression range or worse on a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 patient depression questionnaire, with outcomes comparable with the general population after successful treatment.5

While headaches with an orthostatic or exertional component are the most common presenting symptoms, the involvement of less frequent or atypical symptoms poses a diagnostic challenge to suggest SIH. Patients can receive an inaccurate diagnosis (commonly migraine disorder), with true diagnosis being delayed by up to 13 months on average.3 Conventional brain MRI can detect sagging of the brain, dural thickening/enhancement, and venous distension to suggest SIH, but upwards of 19% of patients with SIH have a normal brain MRI despite presence of CSF leak.6

SIH almost always occurs from a spinal CSF leak.7 CSF-venous fistulas (CVFs) are becoming an increasingly prevalent recognized cause of SIH, especially in the absence of a longitudinally extensive extradural collection. CVFs are now believed to be the most common cause of SIH.8 Unfortunately, CVFs are occult on conventional CT and MRI and require lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography (DSM) or CT myelography for diagnosis.9⇓⇓-12 Myelography imaging technique can also play a crucial role in visualization of CVF. In a study comparing DSM performed in the lateral decubitus versus prone positions, CVF was identified in 74% of patients imaged in the lateral decubitus position, as opposed to only 15% of patients imaged in the prone position.13 Furthermore, given the lack of sensitivity from the current diagnostic tools to diagnose SIH, not all patients who undergo lateral decubitus myelography are found to have a spinal CSF leak. More importantly, as more centers begin to perform lateral decubitus myelography for SIH,8 there is an increasing need to recognize pitfalls and potential CVF fake outs.

Though no exact false-positive rate regarding CVF seen on DSM has yet been reported in the literature, it is not unreasonable that in a subset of patients for whom CVF treatments are ineffective, there might actually have been a false-positive CVF seen on imaging. This is an especially important consideration at the cervicothoracic junction, where variation in appearance of nerve sheaths is a common finding, and could be mistaken for a CVF.

Under myelography, CVF presents as linear branching opacification, most often near the neural foramen, and often intermittent.14 We have found that at the cervicothoracic junction, nerve sheaths can take on a linear, elongated configuration. Anecdotally, we have seen cases of these irregular nerve sheaths erroneously reported as CVF. As such, the purpose of our work is to present illustrative cases of the types of anatomic variation in appearance of nonfistulous nerve root sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction. Our hope is that by defining normal anatomic variation, we can lessen the misdiagnosis and mistreatment in the already incredibly complex entity of SIH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed following approval by the local institutional review board. A retrospective review was performed of patients selected from an internal database with a low risk Bern score1 (Bern score mean 1.36, SD 0.8, range 0–2) and a DSM that did not find a spinal CSF leak. Patients were determined to be negative for CVF by 2 independent interpretations by neuroradiologists who specialize in SIH. Nerve sheaths at C6–C7, C7–T1, and T1–T2 on both the left and right were categorized as either normal (nerve sheath measurement of <5 mm on the AP view), elongated linear (nerve sheath measurement of ≥5 mm), linear then bulbous, linear then branching, or diverticulum (no linear component) as demonstrated in Fig 1. Data were collected by a total of 4 subspecialty trained neuroradiologists and 1 neuroradiology fellow. Patient images were excluded if they included a nondiagnostic evaluation due to incomplete intrathecal contrast, the level was not within the field of view, or a meningocele. Basic patient demographic data including age and sex were recorded.

FIG 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 1.

Appearance of nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction. Normal, defined as sheath length of 5 mm or less. Elongate linear, defined as sheath length of greater than 5 mm. Linear then bulbous, defined by elongated sheath with distal outpouching. Linear then branching, defined as elongated sheaths with distal branching components. Diverticulum, defined by focal outpouching of the nerve sheath without a proximal linear or elongated component.

DSM Technique

Typically, DSM took place over 2 days, in which patients were first imaged in the right lateral decubitus position and subsequently in the left lateral decubitus position.10 Patients were positioned with a cushion under their hip in an effort to achieve gradual downward angulation from their lumbar to cervical spine to facilitate flow of contrast within the intrathecal space. A 20- or 22-gauge spinal needle was used to access the thecal sac at L2–L3 or below by using sterile technique, and intrathecal positioning was confirmed by administration of 0.5 mL Iohexol (Omnipaque 300; GE Healthcare). In most cases, 5–10 mL of sterile saline was subsequently slowly infused into the thecal sac to allow for pressurization, followed by hand injection of 5–6 mL Omnipaque 300. Fluoroscopic imaging was first obtained from the lower cervical spine as the superior-most extent of imaging; the inferior-most extent was determined by patient positioning and body habitus. Following this, a second bolus of 5 mL Omnipaque 300 was injected while imaging from the needle access site as the inferior-most extent of the imaging field. The connecting tubing was then removed. The stylet was returned to the bore of the spinal needle and the system was then removed.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were reviewed. The mean age was 52 years (range, 26–79). Twenty-two patients (62.89%) were women. One patient was excluded due to insufficient intrathecal contrast caused by S-shaped thoracolumbar scoliotic curvature limiting flow of contrast, despite attempts of repositioning with pillow placement and table tilt. Five total levels among 3 patients were excluded due to not being within the field of view. One level in 1 patient was excluded due to a meningocele.

Data were analyzed from a total of 34 patients, at a total of 198 nerve sheath levels. In total, 70 levels (35%) had variant anatomy. Twenty-five patients (73.5%) demonstrated variant (non-normal) anatomy at 1 or more levels. Most commonly, variant anatomy was noted at C7–T1 on the right, with 55% (18/33) of patients demonstrating variation at this level (Table). The most common type of variant anatomy observed was an elongated linear nerve sheath, occurring at 14% (28/198) of levels, and representing 40% of variant anatomy (Fig 2, Table).

FIG 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 2.

The observation rate of each specific variant type of nerve sheath at the cervicothoracic junction.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Rate of normal versus variant anatomy by site

DISCUSSION

This study evaluated a common imaging pitfall on DSM, that of irregular nerve sheath diverticula at the cervicothoracic junction. The results found that 74% of patients have variation in appearance of 1 or more nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction. These findings indicate that radiologists interpreting such examinations should be aware of this potential pitfall and not mistake such findings for CVFs (Fig 3).

FIG 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 3.

Variations in imaging appearance of variant, nonfistulous nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction on myelography. A and B, Normal, smooth layering contrast within the thecal sac without prominent nerve sheath diverticula. C, Elongated linear and linear bulbous type nerve sheaths. D, Elongated linear and elongated branching nerve sheaths. E, Diverticula and elongated linear nerve sheaths.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to directly assess irregular nerve root sleeves at these sites. Previously, Kranz et al15 evaluated patients for thoracic and lumbar spinal diverticula and found that 68% of patients with SIH had diverticula compared with 44% of normal controls. Our study evaluating the cervicothoracic junction found that only 17% of patients had bulbous diverticula but, including all irregular nerve sheath types, there was an incidence of 74%.

Variation in the appearance of nerve sheaths at the cervicothoracic junction may be due to variation in meningeal encasement of the exiting dorsal and ventral nerve roots at this level. In analysis of cadaveric spinal nerve roots, it has been noted that in the cervical spine, the dorsal and ventral nerve roots exit through separate dural ostia. However, in the thoracic spine these ostia tend to be closer together, with a thicker and more elongated perineural sheath (Fig 4).16 There is much variation in cell layers contributing to coverage of nerve roots as they leave the thecal sac, and variations at the cervicothoracic junction may contribute to differences in imaging appearance on DSM.

FIG 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 4.

Appearance of exiting nerve roots at the cervical and thoracic levels. Cross-sectional drawings depict the relationship of meningeal layers and connective tissues surrounding the exiting nerve root. In the cervical spine, the dorsal and ventral nerve roots exit through separate dural ostia.

On DSM, a true CVF appears as a filling linear, sometimes intermittent,14 branching opacification at the level of a contrast-opacified nerve root sheath (Fig 5). The fistula often appears as a “blush” of contrast, first slowly appearing, and then gradually draining away as the nerve sheath empties of contrast. Often, the associated nerve root has a diverticulum type morphology, with the fistulous connecting commonly arising from the diverticulum itself.17 Additionally, true CVFs can demonstrate pulsatility with respiration, with more robust opacification during inspiration.18,19

FIG 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG 5.

Examples of true CVFs at the cervicothoracic junction. A, A 61-year-old woman with linear bulbous diverticula at C7–T1 and T1–T2. Linear opacification arising from the thecal sac proper represents a true CSF-venous fistula at both levels. B, A 62-year-old woman with linear bulbous nerve sheath anatomy at C7–T1. Adjacent linear, branching opacification arising from the nerve sheath neck represents a true CSF-venous fistula (arrow).

Once appropriately identified, treatment options for CVFs include embolization,20 surgery,21 or fibrin glue injection,22 each of which report high success rates. Incorrectly diagnosing a patient with a CVF can lead to unnecessary treatment. This burden is known by CSF leak centers but has not yet been well captured in the literature.

Our study has limitations, first being that we cannot prove that patients in our study did not have a true CVF. No criteria currently exist to define the imaging characteristics of a true CVF on DSM, however the irregular cervicothoracic nerve sheaths are important pitfalls that DSM practitioners should be aware of. We did select patients with low-risk brain MRI, who had DSM performed and interpreted by neuroradiologists who specialize in SIH, and had the images read by 2 people to confirm agreement on the lack of CVF. Given that our data are from a single institution, this also could limit the generalizability to other centers. Finally, there is some potential overlap in the imaging appearance of linear then branching and linear then bulbous. Combined, this incidence of these 2 types is 43%. Nevertheless, they are still a subtype of irregular nerve sheath at the cervicothoracic junction.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide range of anatomic variation at the cervicothoracic junction, where nerve sheaths on DSM can take on elongated linear, linear then bulbous, linear then branching, or diverticular configurations. It is important to recognize these normal anatomic variants that occur in most patients, and to recognize that they do not represent true CVF. As utilization of DSM for the diagnosis of CVF continues to evolve and be adopted by more centers, it is ever more important to understand potential imaging pitfalls associated with work-up, so we can better treat our patients and minimize nonefficacious procedures.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Dobrocky T,
    2. Grunder L,
    3. Breiding PS, et al
    . Assessing spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks in spontaneous intracranial hypotension with a scoring system based on brain magnetic resonance imaging findings. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:580–87 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4921 pmid:30776059
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Patel NP,
    2. Brinjikji W
    . Cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2024;35:311–18 doi:10.1016/j.nec.2024.02.003 pmid:38782524
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Schievink WI
    . Misdiagnosis of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1713–18 doi:10.1001/archneur.60.12.1713 pmid:14676045
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cheema S,
    2. Joy C,
    3. Pople J, et al
    . Patient experience of diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a cross-sectional online survey. BMJ Open 2022;12:e057438 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057438 pmid:35058269
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Liaw V,
    2. McCreary M,
    3. Friedman DI
    . Quality of life in patients with confirmed and suspected spinal CSF leaks. Neurology 2023;101:e2411–22 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000207763 pmid:37816637
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Callen AL,
    2. Friedman DI,
    3. Parikh S, et al
    . Diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: role of epidural blood patching. Neurol Clin Pract 2024;14:e200290 doi:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200290 pmid:38699599
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Mark IT,
    2. Cutsforth-Gregory J,
    3. Luetmer P, et al
    . Skull base CSF leaks: potential underlying pathophysiology and evaluation of brain MR imaging findings associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:1593–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8333 pmid:38719609
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Mamlouk MD,
    2. Callen AL,
    3. Madhavan AA, et al
    . Spinal CSF leaks: the neuroradiologist transforming care. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:1613–20 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8484 pmid:39209484
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mamlouk MD,
    2. Ochi RP,
    3. Jun P, et al
    . Decubitus CT myelography for CSF-venous fistulas: a procedural approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:32–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6844 pmid:33122215
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mark IT,
    2. Madhavan AA,
    3. Benson JC, et al
    . Introduction to digital subtraction myelography for CSF-venous fistula detection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2025;46:219 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8587 pmid:39779293
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Madhavan AA,
    2. Lutzen N,
    3. Cutsforth-Gregory JK, et al
    . Additional diagnostic value of cone beam CT myelography performed after digital subtraction myelography for detecting CSF-venous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2025;46:1044–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8535 pmid:39406513
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Madhavan AA,
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Cutsforth-Gregory JK, et al
    . Myelographic techniques for the localization of CSF-venous fistulas: updates in 2024. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2024;45:1403–12 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A8299 pmid:39089875
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Schievink WI,
    2. Maya MM,
    3. Moser FG, et al
    . Lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography to identify spinal CSF-venous fistulas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;31:902–05 doi:10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19487 pmid:31518974
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Mark I,
    2. Madhavan A,
    3. Oien M, et al
    . Temporal characteristics of CSF-venous fistulas on digital subtraction myelography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:492–95 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7809 pmid:36894299
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Stinnett SS,
    3. Huang KT, et al
    . Spinal meningeal diverticula in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: analysis of prevalence and myelographic appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1284–89 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3359 pmid:23221945
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Tubbs RS,
    2. Lobashevsky A,
    3. Oakes P, et al
    . Meningeal relationships to the spinal nerves and rootlets: a gross, histological, and radiological study with application to intradural extramedullary spinal tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 2015;31:675–81 doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2648-z pmid:25686899
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Amrhein TJ,
    3. Gray L
    . CSF venous fistulas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension: imaging characteristics on dynamic and CT myelography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2017;209:1360–66 doi:10.2214/AJR.17.18351 pmid:29023155
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mark IT,
    2. Amans MR,
    3. Shah VN, et al
    . Resisted inspiration: a new technique to aid in the detection of CSF-venous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022;43:1544–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7636 pmid:36137659
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kranz PG,
    2. Malinzak MD,
    3. Gray L, et al
    . Resisted inspiration improves visualization of CSF-venous fistulas in spontaneous intracranial hypotension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023;44:994–98 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7927 pmid:37414450
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Madhavan A,
    3. Garza I, et al
    . Clinical and imaging outcomes of 100 patients with cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas treated by transvenous embolization. J Neurointerv Surg 2024;16:1256–63 doi:10.1136/jnis-2023-021012 pmid:37898553
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Konovalov A,
    2. Gadzhiagaev V,
    3. Vinogradov E, et al
    . Surgical treatment efficacy of CSF-venous fistulas: systematic review. World Neurosurg 2022;161:91–96 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.036 pmid:35176526
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mamlouk MD,
    2. Shen PY,
    3. Sedrak MF, et al
    . CT-guided fibrin glue occlusion of cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistulas. Radiology 2021;299:409–18 doi:10.1148/radiol.2021204231 pmid:33650903
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received March 25, 2025.
  • Accepted after revision June 13, 2025.
  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Irregular Cervicothoracic Nerve Sheaths on Digital Subtraction Myelography: A CSF Venous Fistula Mimic
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Asmita Patel, Jared Verdoorn, Ajay A. Madhavan, John Benson, Waleed Brinjikji, Ben Johnson-Tesch, Parnian Habibi, Ian T. Mark
Irregular Cervicothoracic Nerve Sheaths on Digital Subtraction Myelography: A CSF Venous Fistula Mimic
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8892

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Irregular Nerve Sheaths as a Mimic of CSF
Asmita Patel, Jared Verdoorn, Ajay A. Madhavan, John Benson, Waleed Brinjikji, Ben Johnson-Tesch, Parnian Habibi, Ian T. Mark
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8892
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Predictive Value of Negative Brain MRI in CSF-VF
  • Consensus Guidelines SIH diagnostic imaging
  • CT-Guided Patching for Lateral Dural Tears in SIH
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Peer-Review Policy
  • Transparency in Authorship Policy
  • Conflict-of-Interest Policy
  • News and Updates
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire