PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Strigel, Roberta M.
AU  - Moritz, Chad H.
AU  - Haughton, Victor M.
AU  - Badie, Behnam
AU  - Field, Aaron
AU  - Wood, David
AU  - Hartman, Michael
AU  - Rowley, Howard A.
TI  - Evaluation of a Signal Intensity Mask in the Interpretation of Functional MR Imaging Activation Maps
DP  - 2005 Mar 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 578--584
VI  - 26
IP  - 3
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/26/3/578.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/26/3/578.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2005 Mar 01; 26
AB  - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of susceptibility artifacts on functional MR imaging (fMRI) studies and their effect on fMRI readings. We hypothesized that the availability of the signal intensity maps (SIMs) changes the interpretation of fMRI studies in which susceptibility artifacts affected eloquent brain regions.METHODS: We reviewed 152 consecutive clinical fMRI studies performed with a SIM. The SIM consisted of the initial echo-planar images (EPI) in each section thresholded to eliminate signal intensity from outside the brain and then overlaid on anatomic images. The cause of the artifact was then determined by examining the images. Cases with a susceptibility artifact in eloquent brain were included in a blinded study read by four readers, first without and then with the SIM. For each reader, the number of times the interpretation changed on viewing the SIM was counted.RESULTS: Of 152 patients, 44% had signal intensity loss involving cerebral cortex and 18% involving an eloquent brain region. Causes of the artifacts were: surgical site artifact, blood products, dental devices, calcium, basal ganglia calcifications, ICP monitors, embolization materials, and air. When provided with the SIM, readers changed interpretations in 8–38% of patient cases, depending on reader experience and size and location of susceptibility artifact.CONCLUSION: Patients referred for clinical fMRI have a high incidence of susceptibility artifacts, whose presence and size can be determined by inspection of the SIM but not anatomic images. The availability of the SIM may affect interpretation of the fMRI.