RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Improved Detection of Subtle Mesial Temporal Sclerosis: Validation of a Commercially Available Software for Automated Segmentation of Hippocampal Volume
JF American Journal of Neuroradiology
JO Am. J. Neuroradiol.
FD American Society of Neuroradiology
DO 10.3174/ajnr.A5966
A1 Mettenburg, J.M.
A1 Branstetter, B.F.
A1 Wiley, C.A.
A1 Lee, P.
A1 Richardson, R.M.
YR 2019
UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/early/2019/02/07/ajnr.A5966.abstract
AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Identification of mesial temporal sclerosis is critical in the evaluation of individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy. Our aim was to assess the performance of FDA-approved software measures of hippocampal volume to identify mesial temporal sclerosis in patients with medically refractory temporal lobe epilepsy compared with the initial clinical interpretation of a neuroradiologist.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative MRIs of 75 consecutive patients who underwent a temporal resection for temporal lobe epilepsy from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed, and 71 were analyzed using Neuroreader, a commercially available automated segmentation and volumetric analysis package. Volume measures, including hippocampal volume as a percentage of total intracranial volume and the Neuroreader Index, were calculated. Radiologic interpretations of the MR imaging and pathology from subsequent resections were classified as either mesial temporal sclerosis or other, including normal findings. These measures of hippocampal volume were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves on the basis of pathologic confirmation of mesial temporal sclerosis in the resected temporal lobe. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each method and compared by means of the McNemar test using the optimal threshold as determined by the Youden J point.RESULTS: Optimized thresholds of hippocampal percentage of a structural volume relative to total intracranial volume (<0.19%) and the Neuroreader Index (≤−3.8) were selected to optimize sensitivity and specificity (89%/71% and 89%/78%, respectively) for the identification of mesial temporal sclerosis in temporal lobe epilepsy compared with the initial clinical interpretation of the neuroradiologist (50% and 87%). Automated measures of hippocampal volume predicted mesial temporal sclerosis more accurately than radiologic interpretation (McNemar test, P < .0001).CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available automated segmentation and volume analysis of the hippocampus accurately identifies mesial temporal sclerosis and performs significantly better than the interpretation of the radiologist.EEGelectroencephalographyMTSmesial temporal sclerosisNRINeuroreader Index%Volpercentage of a structural volume relative to total intracranial volume