PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - F. Flottmann
AU  - H. Leischner
AU  - G. Broocks
AU  - T.D. Faizy
AU  - A. Aigner
AU  - M. Deb-Chatterji
AU  - G. Thomalla
AU  - J. Krauel
AU  - M. Issleib
AU  - J. Fiehler
AU  - C. Brekenfeld
TI  - Emergency Conversion to General Anesthesia Is a Tolerable Risk in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy
AID  - 10.3174/ajnr.A6321
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - American Journal of Neuroradiology
PG  - 122--127
VI  - 41
IP  - 1
4099  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/41/1/122.short
4100  - http://www.ajnr.org/content/41/1/122.full
SO  - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2020 Jan 01; 41
AB  - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke is performed with the patient under local anesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia. According to recent trials, up to 16% of patients require emergency conversion to general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy. This study investigated the procedural and clinical outcomes after emergency conversion in comparison with local anesthesia, conscious sedation, and general anesthesia.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 254 patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute large-vessel occlusion. The procedure was started with the patient either under local anesthesia, conscious sedation, or general anesthesia. Emergency conversion was defined as induction of general anesthesia during mechanical thrombectomy. The primary outcomes were successful reperfusion (TICI 2b/3) and functional independence (mRS at 90 days, ≤2).RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (9.8%) required emergency conversion to general anesthesia. The time from admission to flow restoration was increased under general anesthesia (median, 137 minutes) and emergency conversion (median, 138 minutes) compared with local anesthesia (median 110 minutes). After adjustment for confounders, emergency conversion to general anesthesia and primary general anesthesia had comparable chances of successful reperfusion (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.31–5.25). Patients with emergency conversion had a tendency toward higher chances of functional independence (OR = 4.48; 95% CI, 0.49–40.86) compared with primary general anesthesia, but not compared with local anesthesia (OR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.14–5.11) and conscious sedation (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.17–6.53).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with emergency conversion did not have lower chances of successful reperfusion or functional independence compared those with primary general anesthesia, and time to flow restoration was also similar. We found no evidence supporting the primary induction of general anesthesia in patients at risk for emergency conversion.CSconscious sedationGAgeneral anesthesiaMAPmean arterial pressure