PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lim, R.P. AU - Shapiro, M. AU - Wang, E.Y. AU - Law, M. AU - Babb, J.S. AU - Rueff, L.E. AU - Jacob, J.S. AU - Kim, S. AU - Carson, R.H. AU - Mulholland, T.P. AU - Laub, G. AU - Hecht, E.M. TI - 3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA AID - 10.3174/ajnr.A1252 DP - 2008 Nov 01 TA - American Journal of Neuroradiology PG - 1847--1854 VI - 29 IP - 10 4099 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/29/10/1847.short 4100 - http://www.ajnr.org/content/29/10/1847.full SO - Am. J. Neuroradiol.2008 Nov 01; 29 AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) offers the combined advantage of large anatomic coverage and hemodynamic flow information. We applied parallel imaging and time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories (TWIST), which uses a spiral trajectory to undersample k-space, to perform time-resolved MRA of the extracranial internal carotid arteries and compare it to time-of-flight (TOF) and high-resolution contrast-enhanced (HR) MRA.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 31 patients who underwent carotid MRA at 1.5T using TOF, time-resolved and HR MRA was performed. Images were evaluated for the presence and degree of ICA stenosis, reader confidence, and number of pure arterial frames attained with the TWIST technique.RESULTS: With a consensus interpretation of all sequences as the reference standard, accuracy for identifying stenosis was 90.3% for TWIST MRA, compared with 96.0% and 88.7% for HR MRA and TOF MRA, respectively. HR MRA was significantly more accurate than the other techniques (P < .05). TWIST MRA yielded datasets with high in-plane spatial resolution and distinct arterial and venous phases. It provided dynamic information not otherwise available. Mean diagnostic confidence was satisfactory or greater for TWIST in all patients.CONCLUSION: The TWIST technique consistently obtained pure arterial phase images while providing dynamic information. It is rapid, uses a low dose of contrast, and may be useful in specific circumstances, such as in the acute stroke setting. However, it does not yet have spatial resolution comparable with standard contrast-enhanced MRA.