Table 2:

Mantel-Haenzel row mean score test statistic (P value) based on a χ2 distribution with 1 degree of freedom (3 degrees of freedom for the overall analysis), stratified on matched pairs, for every vessel and image quality parameter by reader

VesselReader 1Reader 2Reader 3Overall
Arterial score 1: CCA9.3077 (0.0023)4.0000 (0.0455)2.0000 (0.1573)15.3077 (0.0016)
Arterial score 2: Bifurcation9.0000 (0.0027)8.3333 (0.0039)5.0000 (0.0253)22.3333 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 3: ICA8.8947 (0.0029)8.0000 (0.0047)4.0000 (0.0455)20.8947 (0.0001)
Arterial score 4: ECA8.8947 (0.0029)9.0000 (0.0027)4.0000 (0.0455)21.8947 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 5: Intraosseous portion of ICA9.2807 (0.0023)8.8947 (0.0029)5.0000 (0.0253)23.1754 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 6: Vertebral arteries6.4000 (0.0114)8.3333 (0.0039)7.0000 (0.0082)21.7333 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 7: Basilar artery8.9091 (0.0028)10.000 (0.0016)6.2308 (0.0126)25.1399 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 8: Communicating arteries8.8947 (0.0029)8.8947 (0.0029)6.2308 (0.0126)24.0202 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 9: First segments: A1, M1, P18.3333 (0.0039)6.0000 (0.0143)9.0000 (0.0027)23.3333 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 10: Second segments: A2, M2, P29.0000 (0.0027)8.3333 (0.0039)9.3077 (0.0023)26.3333 (<0.0001)
Arterial score 11: Third segments: A3, M3, P39.3226 (0.0023)9.1429 (0.0025)10.000 (0.0016)28.4655 (<0.0001)
Venous score 1: Internal and bridging cerebral veins5.4000 (0.0201)7.0000 (0.0082)4.4545 (0.0348)16.8545 (0.0008)
Venous score 2: Cavernous sinus9.0000 (0.0027)4.0000 (0.0455)6.0000 (0.0143)19.0000 (0.0003)
Venous score 3: Superior saggital sinus2.0000 (0.1573)1.0000 (0.3173)0 (1)3.0000 (0.3916)
Venous score 4: Transverse and sigmoid sinus1.0000 (0.3173)1.0000 (0.3173)1.0000 (0.3173)3.0000 (0.3916)
Venous score 5: Jugular veins1.0000 (0.3173)1.0000 (0.3173)0 (1)†††2.0000 (0.5724)
Quality score 1: Quality overall: 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)7.3636 (0.0067)9.0000 (0.0027)1.0000 (0.3173)17.3636 (0.0006)
Quality score 2: Artifacts: 1 (cannot be interpreted) to 5 (no artifacts)4.0000 (0.0455)1.0000 (0.3173)0 (1)†††5.0000 (0.1718)
Quality score 3: Dental artifacts: 1 (cannot be interpreted) to 5 (no artifacts)1.0000 (0.3173)1.0000 (0.3173)0 (1)†††2.0000 (0.5724)
Quality score 4: Delineation of vascular calcification: 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent)9.000 (0.0027)7.118 (0.0076)4.000 (0.0455)20.1176 (0.0002)
Quality score 5: Subjective contrast: 1 (insufficient) to 5 (excellent)0 (1)6.0000 (0.0143)0 (1)6.0000 (0.1116)
  • Note:—In every instance where the test was significant, the shift in row mean scores was due to a higher distribution of scores for MIP. Significant results are marked in bold. CCA indicates common carotid artery; ICA, internal carotid artery; ECA, external carotid artery.

  • In one of the 10 subjects, all readers chose n/a, as no calcifications were discerned with either technique.

  • Only 2 of the possible 5 scores were used for every subject, for both MIP and MPR. The resulting 2 × 2 table has identical MIP and MPR scores within every subject. Thus, the Mantel-Haenzel row mean score test, stratified on matched pairs, cannot be computed due to a singular covariance matrix. However, in this situation, McNemar’s test for 2 × 2 tables can be used. Here, McNemar’s test statistic is 0 with a P value of 1.

  • ††† MIP and MPR scores are identical within every subject, and thus the Mantel-Haenzel row mean score test, stratified on matched pairs, cannot be computed due to a singular covariance matrix.