Patient No. | Presentation | HH | Location | Size | Stent | Stenting Strategy | Initial Results | mRS at Discharge | Angiographic FU | Clinical FU | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interval | Results | Interval | mRS | |||||||||
1 | Ruptured | 2 | L-Bifur | S | NF 3.0/20 | Jailing | Class I | 1 | 9 m, MRA | Stable | 67 m | 0 |
2 | Ruptured | 2 | R-Bifur | S | NF 3.5/15 | Mesh | Class I | 1 | 6 m, DSA | Class I | 52 m | 1 |
3 | Unruptured | 0 | R-Bifur | S | NF 2.5/20 | Jailing | Class III | 0 | 7 m, DSA | Class I | 49 m | 0 |
4 | Ruptured | 1 | L-Bifur | S | NF 3.5/15 | Mesh | Class I | 1 | 6 m, DSA | Class I | 32 m | 0 |
5 | Ruptured | 2 | R-Bifur | S | NF 3.0/15 | Mesh | Class I | 1 | 6 m, MRA | Stable | 30 m | 0 |
6 | Ruptured | 4 | L-Bifur | L | LEO 4.5/25 | Waffle cone | Class III | 6 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
7 | Recurrence | 0 | R-Bifur | T | NF 3.0/20 | Stenting alone | NA | 0 | 4 m, MRA | Stable | 18 m | 0 |
8 | Unruptured | 0 | R-Bifur | T | NF 2.5/15 | Stenting alone | NA | 0 | 9 m, DSA | Class I | 11 m | 0 |
9 | Unruptured | 0 | R-M1 | T | NF 3.5/20 | Stenting alone | NA | 0 | 4 m, MRA | Stable | 9 m | 0 |
10 | Ruptured | 1 | L-Bifur | S | NF 2.5/15 | Y-Configuration | Class I | 1 | 7 m, DSA | Class I | 7 m | 0 |
11 | Unruptured | 0 | R-Bifur | S | EP 4.5/22 | Jailing | Class I | 0 | 3 m, MRA | Stable | 6 m | 0 |
12 | Ruptured | 1 | L-Bifur | S | NF 3.0/20 | Coil plus stent | Class III | 1 | 6 m, DSA | Class I | 6 m | 0 |
13 | Unruptured | 0 | L-M1 | L | LEO 3.5/18 | Mesh | Class I | 0 | 5 m, DSA | Class I | 5 m | 1 |
14 | Ruptured | 2 | L-Bifur | L | NF 3.5/20 | Mesh | Class I | 4 | 1 m, MRA | Stable | 1 m | 4 |
15 | Ruptured | 2 | L-Bifur | S | LEO 3.5/18 | Mesh | Class II | 1 | NA | NA | 5 m | 1 |
16 | Ruptured | 1 | L-Bifur | S | LEO 3.5/18 | Mesh | Class I | 1 | NA | NA | 4 m | 1 |
a Embolization results were classified using the Raymond classification system: class I, complete occlusion; class II, residual neck; class III, residual sac.