Table 1:

Qualitative analysis (n = 42)a

TRCBFCBVTTDMTTTTP
2-second1-second2-second1-second2-second1-second2-second1-second2-second1-second
DC
    Quality score7.0 (5.6–7.0)7.0 (5.6–7.0)7.0 (6.0–7.0)7.0 (6.0–7.0)7.5 (6.1–8.0)7.5 (6.1–8.0)3.5 (2.0–4.0)3.5 (2.5–4.0)N/AN/A
    Level of significanceNot significantNot significantNot significantP < .05N/A
    Category
        I81%81%83%86%90%90%12%14%N/AN/A
        II19%19%17%14%10%10%67%64%N/AN/A
        III0%0%0%0%0%0%21%21%N/AN/A
MS
    Quality score5.8 (3.1–6.5)6.5 (5.1–7.5)6.5 (4.0–7.5)6.5 (5.5–7.5)N/AN/AN/AN/A6.5 (5.0–6.5)6.5 (5.0–6.5)
    Level of significanceP < .001P < .05N/AN/AP < .05
    Category
        I62%76%69%81%N/AN/AN/AN/A76%76%
        II26%19%24%14%N/AN/AN/AN/A21%24%
        III12%5%7%5%N/AN/AN/AN/A2%0%
  • a All values are median (interquartile range). Quality scores are on a scale from 0 (worst) to 8 (best) points.