Table 5:

Relationship between cognitive impairment and sublobar GM qCBV

Lobe and ParameterEstimateSEχ2P Value
Frontal, left (goodness of fit: deviance, df = 1.11; Pearson χ2, df = 0.95)
    Intercept18.75974.052121.43<.0001
    qCBV
        IF−0.53960.18868.190.0042b
        MidF−0.47400.16648.110.0044b
        MIF−0.51850.19177.320.0068
        MMidF−0.45980.16687.600.0058
        MSF−0.48720.17088.130.0043b
        SF−0.53870.19028.020.0046b
        BPF−17.54035.288111.000.0009b
    WML volumea0.63010.183311.820.0006b
Frontal, right (goodness of fit: deviance, df = 1.11; Pearson χ2, df = 0.95)
    Intercept18.10613.981920.68<.0001
    qCBV
        IF−0.51660.19866.770.0093
        MidF−0.46850.17197.430.0064
        MIF−0.53980.21006.610.0101
        MMidF−0.43170.15947.340.0068
        MSF−0.49060.17417.940.0048b
        SF−0.56380.20397.650.0057
    BPF−16.57995.211610.120.0015b
    WML volumea0.65320.184312.560.0004b
  • Note:—IF indicates inferior frontal; MidF, middle frontal; MIF, medial inferior frontal; MmidF, medial middle frontal; MSF, medial superior frontal; SF, superior frontal; WML, white matter lesion.

  • a Natural logarithmic transformation was applied.

  • b Significant result (P < .005, Bonferroni adjusted).