Table 3:

Three models combining an imaging parameter with clinical factors as potential prognostic variables of overall survival in patients with gliomas

FactorsHR (95% CI)P Value
Model 1
    Age older than 50 yr1.03 (0.99–1.06).17
    Biopsy vs resection4.11 (1.68–10.05).002
    Grade 3 vs 21.20 (0.19–7.65).85
    Grade 4 vs 21.21 (0.28–5.33).80
    Karnofsky score < 802.56 (1.19–5.51).02
    Ktrans ≥ 0.05 min−14.53 (1.22–16.82).02
Model 2
    Age older than 50 yr1.06 (1.03–1.09).0002
    Biopsy vs resection3.68 (1.54–8.78).004
    Grade 3 vs 21.06 (0.16–6.89).95
    Grade 4 vs 21.76 (0.35–8.75).49
    Karnofsky score < 803.21 (1.48–6.92).003
    Vp ≥ 5 mL/100 g1.30 (0.37–4.54).68
Model 3
    Age older than 50 yr1.03 (0.99–1.07).087
    Biopsy vs resection4.36 (1.77–10.77).002
    Grade 3 vs 21.28 (0.20–8.25).79
    Grade 4 vs 21.00 (0.22–4.63).99
    Karnofsky score < 802.51 (1.16–5.43).02
    Marked contrast enhancement4.79 (1.22–18.87).03