Table 3:

Qualitative and quantitative analyses of 3D T2WI-DRIVE and sDRICE images

Parameter3D T2WI-DRIVEsDRICEP Value
Lesion conspicuity on the neurovascular contact pointa
    Rater 1
        Overall (N = 12)2.0 (1–3)3.0 (2–3).006
        HFS (n = 6)1.5 (1–2)3.0 (3–3).023
        TN (n = 6)2.5 (1–3)3.0 (2–3).102
    Rater 2
        Overall (N = 12)2.0 (1–3)3.0 (2–3).004
        HFS (n = 6)1.5 (1–2)3.0 (2–3).038
        TN (n = 6)2.0 (1–3)3.0 (3–3).038
Contrast (N = 12)b
    Vessel/nerve−1.21 ± 0.720.28 ± 0.15<.001
    Vessel/brain stem−1.08 ± 0.670.17 ± 0.88<.001
CNR (N = 12)b
    Vessel/nerve−1.80 ± 1.473.34 ± 1.99.007
    Vessel/brain stem−0.97 ± 0.582.25 ± 1.57.003
  • a Scoring data are listed for both raters as rater 1/rater 2 and correspond to the median (with range) across patients. P values were calculated with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

  • b Contrast and CNR data are means ± SD. The P values were calculated with a paired t test. Contrasta/b = 2(SIaSIb)/(SIa + SIb), and CNRa/b = (SIaSIb)/SDa.