Table 4:

Comparison of AUC values between the largest and perpendicular diameter in skull lateral filmsa

Lateral ImageAUC
LPP Valueb
Size
    <5.3 mm (n = 38)0.76 (0.59∼0.88)c0.82 (0.66∼0.92)c.55
    ≥5.3 mm (n = 40)0.77 (0.62∼0.89)c0.83 (0.68∼0.93)c.59
PDd
    <24% (n = 36)0.61 (0.44∼0.77)0.64 (0.46∼0.79).72
    ≥24% (n = 38)0.79 (0.63∼0.90)c0.89 (0.74∼0.96)c.55
Stent
    (−) (n = 45)0.69 (0.54∼0.82)c0.69 (0.53∼0.82)c.96
    (+) (n = 33)0.87 (0.71∼0.96)c0.88 (0.72∼0.96)c.80
Rupture status
    (−) (n = 62)0.67 (0.53∼0.78)0.82 (0.70∼0.91)c.06
    (+) (n = 16)0.76 (0.49∼0.93)0.59 (0.32∼0.83).21
  • Note:—PD indicates packing attenuation; (−), coil embolization without stent (in “Stent”), unruptured aneurysm (in “Rupture status”); (+), stent-assisted coil embolization (in “Stent”), ruptured aneurysm (in “Rupture status”); L, largest diameter; P, perpendicular diameter; AUC, area under the curve.

  • a Data in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

  • b AUC values between both diameters were compared.

  • c Statistically significant (P < .05).

  • d Seventy-four of 78 cases had the record of packing attenuation.