Table 2:

Survival analysis of MRI features for patients with solitary ISCMs (n = 39)

VariableMedian Survival (daysa) (95% CI)Hazard Ratio (95% CI)P Valueb
No. of ISCMs.022
    Solitary (n = 39)121 (42–187)
    Multiple (n = 10)53 (12–88)
Noncord CNS/spinal metastases.879
    No (n = 19)166 (87–334)
    Yes (n = 20)79 (26–184)
Leptomeningeal metastases.274
    No (n = 27)127 (38–231)
    Yes (n = 12)113 (24–790)
Primary tumor/non-CNS metastases.012
    No (n = 15)316 (38–790)
    Yes (n = 24)96 (32–166)
Cord T2 hyperintensity ≥2 segmentsc.037
    No (n = 10)184 (24–884)
    Yes (n = 28)111 (38–166)
Cord T2 hyperintensity ≥3 segmentsc.018
    No (n = 12)184 (24–790)
    Yes (n = 26)111 (38–166)
Cord T2 hyperintensity (No. of segments)c (n = 38)121 (42–187)1.02 (0.96–1.09).541
ISCM enhancement, superoinferior size (mm)c (n = 35)120 (42–187)1.01 (0.99–1.02).138
ISCM enhancement, extent (No. of vertebral segments)c (n = 35)120 (42–187)1.08 (0.85–1.38).524
Ratio, longitudinal extent of cord T2 hyperintensity to enhancementc (n = 34)119 (40–187)1.03 (0.94–1.13).477
Rim signc.621
    No (n = 18)79 (26–643)
    Yes (n = 17)127 (40–299)
Flame signc.068
    No (n = 19)127 (42–734)
    Yes (n = 16)96 (26–299)
Rim/flame signsc.143
    Neither (n = 13)121 (32–884)
    Rim sign only (n = 6)147 (21–790)
    Flame sign only (n = 5)26 (15–643)
    Both signs (n = 11)120 (38–316)
  • Note:— – indicates not applicable.

  • a From date of ISCM diagnosis.

  • b P values are for log-rank tests for categoric variables and Wald tests for continuous variables.

  • c Missing patients (n < 39) due to MRI not having sagittal T2- or gadolinium-enhanced sagittal T1-weighted images.