Table 2:

Comparison of demographics, clinical presentation, and MRI findings of 3 types of spinal arteriovenous shunts below the conusa

CharacteristicsFTAVF (n = 11)rAVS (n = 7)SDAVF (n = 30)All (n = 48)P Valueb
Demographic
    Age (mean) (yr)52.9 ± 12.637.4 ± 15.755.6 ± 14.952.4 ± 15.5.017c
    Female sex3 (27.3%)3 (42.9%)6 (20%)12 (25%).443
Clinical symptoms
    Duration of symptoms (mean) (mo)12.1 ± 7.89.9 ± 9.813.1 ± 28.012.4 ± 22.6.396
    Back pain3 (27.3%)3 (42.9%)2 (6.7%)8 (17.0%).028c
    Progressive paraparesis11 (100.0%)6 (85.7%)27 (90.0%)44 (91.7%).598
    Progressive hypesthesia7 (63.6%)6 (85.7%)20 (66.7%)33 (68.8%).739
    Numbness5 (45.5%)3 (42.9%)16 (53.3%)24 (50%).844
    Bowel/bladder dysfunction8 (72.7%)4 (57.1%)26 (86.7%)38 (79.2%).167
MRI findings
    Spinal cord edema11 (100%)5 (71.4%)28 (93.3%)44 (91.7%).129
    Engorged vein10 (90.9%)6 (85.7%)29 (96.7%)45 (93.8%).313
    Spinal cord tethering6 (54.5%)0 (0.0%)7 (23.3%)13 (27.1%).032c
    Sacral lipoma5 (45.5%)0 (0.0%)5 (16.7%)10 (20.8%).061
  • a Data are number and percentage unless otherwise indicated.

  • b Comparison among FTAVF, rAVS, and SDAVF.

  • c Statistically significant values.