Table 4:

nCBF low- vs high-grade thresholds and ROC analysis results

Team/Entry No.SoftwareLG vs HG (P Value)ThresholdSNSPAUC
A5IB Neuro2.90E-051.8150.8060.8460.861
B5IB Neuro2.38E-051.5550.9170.7690.864
C2IB Neuro3.82E-061.4150.9440.7690.880
B6Matlab2.61E-042.0450.7220.8460.814
D4nordicICE9.81E-061.2550.9720.7690.868
D5nordicICE3.03E-051.5800.8610.8460.866
E7PGUI1.30E-041.5750.8060.8460.846
E8PGUI3.85E-051.3750.9170.6920.845
E9PGUI1.67E-041.4600.8330.7690.812
E10PGUI7.86E-031.9200.6390.6920.658
D6Slicer1.04E-061.4050.9440.7690.887
F2FIAT2.65E-041.4600.8610.7690.816
  • Note:—AUC indicates area under the curve; LG, low-grade; HG, high-grade.