Table 2:

Association of favorable outcome with CBS and FVH score

Favorable OutcomeUnadjustedAdjustedb
NoYesOR (95% CI)POR (95% CI)P
Complete case analysis(n = 151)(n = 165)
 CBS (median) (IQR)6 (5–8)7 (6–8)1.12 (1.01–1.23)c.021.05 (0.93–1.19)c.38
 ≥6 (No.) (%)95 (62.9)125 (75.8)1.84 (1.13–3.00).011.35 (0.75–2.41).31
 FVH (median) (IQR)2 (1–4)3 (1–4)1.17 (1.03–1.32)c.011.14 (0.98–1.33)c.07
Sensitivity analysisa(n = 218)(n = 198)
 CBS (median) (IQR)6 (4–8)7 (5–8)1.15 (1.04–1.26)c.0031.05 (0.94–1.18)c.37
 ≥6 (No.) (%)134 (61.6)150 (75.6)1.93 (1.24–3.00).0031.33 (0.78–2.27).29
 FVH (median) (IQR)2 (0–3)3 (1–4)1.21 (1.08–1.35)c<.0011.17 (1.02–1.34)c.02
  • a Sensitivity analysis was performed in all patients with MR imaging (n = 416) after handling missing values by multiple imputation.

  • b Prespecified adjustment on study (ASTER versus THRACE), age, sex, admission NIHSS, intravenous tPA, and onset-to-groin puncture time.

  • c OR per 1-point increase in CBS or FVH.