Table 3:

Linear regression analysis in AD—cortical MTRs relate to poorer language function in patients with AD

MTR Region	MMSE, n = 77			Language Function (CERAD Test: Boston Naming Test), n = 77			Constructional Praxis (CERAD Test: Figure Copying), n = 73
MTR Region	β	95% CI	P Value^{^a}	β	95% CI	P Value^{^a}	β	95% CI	P Value^{^a}
Global cortex	0.23	−0.07–1.96	.06	0.31	0.19–1.95	.02	0.22	−0.09–1.24	.09
AD-signature regions	0.14	−0.50–1.52	.32	0.28	−0.02–1.74	.05	0.29	−0.01–1.32	.05
Global NAWM	0.17	−0.24–1.67	.14	0.11	−0.05–1.23	.40	0.23	−0.05–1.23	.07
WM hyperintensities	0.01	−0.78–0.88	.91	-0.01	−0.81–0.67	.89	0.01	−0.53–0.59	.92

Note:—β indicates standardized regression coefficient.
↵a Corrected for age, sex, years of education, normalized regional volume, and Fazekas score.