Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to determine the correlation between calcium burden (expressed as a volume) and extent of stenosis of the origin of the internal carotid artery (ICA) by CT angiography (CTA). Previous studies have shown that calcification in the coronary arteries correlates with significant vessel stenosis, and severe calcification (measured by CT) in the carotid siphon correlates with significant (greater than 50% stenosis) as determined angiographically. Sixty-one patients (age range 50–85 years) underwent CT of the neck with intravenous administration of iodinated contrast for a variety of conditions. Images were obtained with a helical multidetector array CT scanner and reviewed on a three-dimensional workstation. A single observer manipulated window and level to segment calcified plaque from vascular enhancement in order to quantify vascular calcium volume (cc) in the region of the bifurcation of the common carotid artery/ICA origin, and to measure the extent of ICA stenosis near the origin. A total of 117 common carotid artery bifurcations were reviewed. A “significant” stenosis was defined arbitrarily as >40% (to detect lesions before they become hemodynamically significant) of luminal diameter on CTA using NASCET-like criteria. All “significant” stenoses (21 out of 117 carotid bifurcations) had measurable calcium. We found a relatively strong correlation between percent stenosis and the calcium volume (Pearson’s r = 0.65, P<0.0001). We also found that there was an even stronger correlation between the square root of the calcium volume and the percent stenosis as measured by CTA (r= 0.77, P<0.0001). Calcium volumes of 0.01, 0.03, 0.06, 0.09 and 0.12 cc were used as thresholds to evaluate for a “significant” stenosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated that thresholds of 0.06 cc (sensitivity 88%, specificity 87%) and 0.03 cc (sensitivity 94%, specificity 76%) generated the best combinations of sensitivity and specificity. Hence, this preliminary study demonstrates a relatively strong relationship between volume of calcium at the carotid bifurcation in the neck (measured by CT) and percent stenosis of the ICA below the skull base (as measured by CTA). Use of calcium volume measurements as a threshold may be both sensitive and specific for the detection of significant ICA stenosis. The significance of the correlation between calcium volume and ICA stenosis is that potentially a “score” can be obtained that will identify those at risk for high grade carotid stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson JG, Leon AS (1994) The prevention of cardiovascular disease. Emphasis on secondary prevention. Med Clin N Am 78:69–98

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alan S, Ulgen MS, Ozturk O, Alan B, Ozdemir L, Toprak N (2003) Relation between coronary artery disease, risk factors and intima-media thickness of carotid artery, arterial distensibility, and stiffness index. Angiology 54:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simon A, Giral P, Levenson J (1995) Extracoronary atherosclerotic plaque at multiple sites and total coronary calcification deposit in asymptomatic men. Association with coronary risk profile. Circulation 92:1414–1421

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crouse JR, Toole JF, McKinney WM, Dignan MB, Howard G, Kahl FR, McMahan MR, Harpold GH (1987) Risk factors for extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. Stroke 18:990–996

    Google Scholar 

  5. Broderick LS, Shemesh J, Wilensky RL et al. (1996) Measurement of coronary artery calcium with dual-slice helical CT compared with coronary angiography: evaluation of CT scoring methods, interobserver variations, and reproducibility. Am J Roentgenol 167:439–444

    Google Scholar 

  6. Woodcock RJ Jr, Goldstein JH, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Phillips CD (1999) Angiographic correlation of CT calcification in the carotid siphon. Am J Neuroradiol 20:495–499

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rumberger JA, Sheedy PF, Breen JF, Schwartz RS (1995) Coronary calcium, as determined by electron beam computed tomography, and coronary disease on arteriogram. Circulation 91:1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simons DB, Schwartz RS, Edwards WD, Sheedy PF, Breen JF, Rumberger JA (1992) Noninvasive definition of anatomic coronary artery disease by ultrafast computed tomographic scanning: a quantitative pathologic comparison study. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:1118–1126

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Hunink MG (2003) Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review (Epub 2003 Apr 10). Stroke 34(5):1324–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnston DC, Goldstein LB (2001) Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 56:1009–1015

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM (1995) Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. Am J Roentgenol 165:233–235

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cinat M, Lane CT, Pham H, Lee A, Wilson SE, Gordon I (1998) Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 28:290–300

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sameshima T, Futami S, Morita Y, Yokogami K, Miyahara S, Sameshima Y, Goya T, Wakisaka S (1999) Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography. Surg Neurol 51:301–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid stenosis (1991) North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial collaborators. N Engl J Med 325:445–53

    Google Scholar 

  15. Janowitz WR, Agatston AS, Viamonte M Jr (1991) Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 68:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson GB, Ashforth R, Steinke DE, Ferdinandy R, Findlay JM (2000) CT angiography for the detection and characterization of carotid artery bifurcation disease. Stroke 31:2168–2174

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Binaghi S, Maeder P, Uske A, Meuwly JY, Devuyst G, Meuli RA (2001) Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis. Eur Neurol 46:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. White JE, Russell WL, Greer MS, Whittle MT (1994) Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Am Surg 60:340–348

    Google Scholar 

  20. Muller M, Ciccotti P, Reiche W, Hagen T (2001) Comparison of color-flow Doppler scanning, power Doppler scanning, and frequency shift for assessment of carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 34:1090–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arbeille P, Desombre C, Aesh B, Philippot M, Lapierre F (1995) Quantification and assessment of carotid artery lesions: degree of stenosis and plaque volume. J Clin Ultrasound 23:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zwiebel WJ, Austin CW, Sackett JF, Strother CM (1983) Correlation of high-resolution, B-mode and continuous-wave Doppler sonography with arteriography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis. Radiology 149:523–532

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blackshear WM Jr, Lamb SL, Kollipara VS, Anderson JD, Murtagh FR, Shah CP, Farber MS (1984) Correlation of hemodynamically significant internal carotid stenosis with pulsed Doppler frequency analysis. Ann Surg 199:475–481

    Google Scholar 

  24. Crouse JR 3rd, Tang R, Espeland MA, Terry JG, Morgan T, Mercuri M (2002) Associations of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis progression with coronary status and risk factors in patients with and without coronary artery disease. Circulation 106:2061–2066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fischer GG, Anderson DC, Farber R, Lebow S (1985) Prediction of carotid disease by ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. Arch Neurol 42:224–227

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mittl RL Jr, Broderick M, Carpenter JP et al. (1994) Blinded-reader comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. Stroke 25:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Keller HM, Valavanis A, Imhof HG, Turina M (1984) Patency of external and internal carotid artery in the presence of an occluded common carotid artery: noninvasive evaluation with combined cerebrovascular Doppler examination and sequential computer tomography. Stroke 15:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  28. Riles TS, Imparato AM, Posner MP, Eikelboom BC (1984) Common carotid occlusion. Assessment of the distal vessels. Ann Surg 199:363–366

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander M. McKinney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McKinney, A.M., Casey, S.O., Teksam, M. et al. Carotid bifurcation calcium and correlation with percent stenosis of the internal carotid artery on CT angiography. Neuroradiology 47, 1–9 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-004-1301-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-004-1301-4

Keywords

Navigation