Skip to main content
Log in

Dural arteriovenous fistula involving the transverse sigmoid sinus after treatment: assessment with magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography (MRDSA) in showing the presence or absence of retrograde venous drainage (RVD) in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) involving the transverse sigmoid sinus (TSS) after treatment.

Methods

Of 16 patients with DAVF involving the TSS, 13 underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MRDSA before and after treatment, and 3 underwent DSA before treatment and DSA and MRDSA after treatment. Five patients underwent these procedures twice after treatment. A total of 21 examinations after treatment were evaluated retrospectively. The presence or absence of DAVF and RVD was decided on the basis of the DSA findings. Two neuroradiologists reviewed the MRDSA findings concerning the presence or absence of DAVF and RVD.

Results

DSA showed residual DAVF in 9 and residual RVD in 5 of 21 examinations. MRDSA revealed residual DAVF in 8 of 21 examinations. MRDSA did not show residual DAVF in one examination because of a very small (low-flow) residual DAVF without RVD. MRDSA identified residual RVD in 5 of 21 examinations. MRDSA was completely consistent with DSA concerning the presence or absence of residual RVD.

Conclusion

MRDSA could evaluate the presence or absence of RVD in patients with DAVF involving TSS after treatment. MRDSA may give reliable information as to whether patients with DAVF involving the TSS should undergo additional DSA after treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Newton TH, Gronqvist S (1969) Involvement of dural arteries in intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Radiology 93:1071–1078

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Awad I, Little J (1990) Dural arteriovenous malformations. In: Barrow D (ed) Intracranial vascular malformations. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Park Ridge, IL, pp 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rodesch G, Lasjaunias P (1992) Physiopathology and semiology of dural arteriovenous shunts. Riv Neuroradiol 5:11–12

    Google Scholar 

  4. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, Nambu A, Kumagai H, Nishiyama Y, Nukui H, Araki T (2000) MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:451–453

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klisch J, Strecker R, Hennig J, Schumacher M (2000) Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations. Neuroradiology 42:104–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, Bongartz G, Seifritz E, Radue EW, Scheffler K (2000) Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1293–1295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Coley SC, Romanowski CAJ, Hodgson TJ, Griffiths PD (2002) Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:404–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noguchi K, Melhem ER, Kanazawa T, Kubo M, Kuwayama N, Seto H (2004) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:183–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horie N, Morikawa M, Kitigawa N, Tsutsumi K, Kaminogo M, Nagata I (2006) 2D thick-section MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:264–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Awad I, Little J, Akrawi W, Ahl J (1990) Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg 72:839–850

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Malik GM, Pearce JE, Ausman JI, Mehta B (1984) Dural arteriovenous malformations and intracranial hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 15:332–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinuela F, Fox AJ, Pelz DM, Drake CG (1986) Unusual clinical manifestations of dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 64:554–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA (1995) A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 82:166–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cognard C, Gobin Y, Pierot L et al (1995) Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 194:671–680

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van Dijk JM, terBrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC (2002) Clinical course of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with long-term persistent cortical venous reflux. Stroke 33:1233–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cognard C, Houdart E, Casasco A, Gabrillargues J, Chiras J, Merland JJ (1997) Long-term changes in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae leading to worsening in the type of venous drainage. Neuroradiology 39:59–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Willinsky R, terBrugge K, Montanera W, Mikulis D, Wallace C (1994) Venous congestion: an MR finding in dural arteriovenous malformations with cortical venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1501–1507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. DeMarco K, Dillon WP, Halbach VV, Tsuruda JS (1990) Dural arteriovenous fistula: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 175:193–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Satomi J, van Dijk JM, Terbrugge KG, Willinsky RA, Wallace MC (2002) Benign cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: outcome of conservative management based on the natural history of the lesion. J Neurosurg 97:767–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh R, Melhem ER (2001) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1615–1619

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Oppenheim C et al (2005) Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1525–1531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cashen TA, Carr JC, Shin W et al (2006) Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:822–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyo Noguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noguchi, K., Kuwayama, N., Kubo, M. et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula involving the transverse sigmoid sinus after treatment: assessment with magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 49, 639–643 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0230-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0230-4

Keywords

Navigation