Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term outcome of a multidisciplinary concept of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae treatment

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The optimal treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (SDAVF) remains controversial and long-term follow-up data, especially data from multidisciplinary treatment, are rarely available. Thus, long-term outcomes following a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of SDAVF were investigated.

Methods

The investigation included 26 patients with SDAVF treated at the authors’ department over a 15-year period including a follow-up of more than 2 years. The treatment strategy when occlusion of the draining vein could be achieved was to embolize the fistula with Histoacryl, with surgery reserved for those patients unsuitable for embolization. Posttreatment angiography followed by MRI was performed in all patients. Clinical follow-up was performed using the gait and micturition Aminoff-Logue scale scores and the modified Rankin scale score.

Results

Embolization was performed in 19 patients (73.1%), and direct surgery in 7 patients (26.9%). Follow-up angiography (at a mean of 21.7 months) showed occlusion of the SDAVF in 24 patients (92.3%). Of the 19 embolized patients, 2 (10.5%) developed recurrence secondary to insufficient occlusion of the SDAVF draining vein, and one of these two patients underwent re-embolization and one re-operation. No negative effects of SDAVF recurrence on the final clinical outcome were identified in either patient. MRI after angiography (at a mean of 91.5 months) demonstrated occlusion of all SDAVFs. After a mean clinical follow-up of 103.4 months there was a statistically significant improvement in both the modified Rankin scale score and the Aminoff-Logue gait scale score (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The present multidisciplinary study showed for the first time that embolization leads to stable neuroradiological results and favourable clinical outcomes even for very long follow-up times of more than 100 months. Microsurgery remains the treatment of choice when safe embolization of the draining vein cannot be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heros RC (1995) Arteriovenous malformations of the spinal cord. In: Ojemann RG, Ogilvy CS, Cromwell RM, Heros RC (eds) Surgical management of neurovascular disease, 3rd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 518–537

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hassler W, Thron A, Grote EH (1989) Hemodynamics of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. An intraoperative study. J Neurosurg 70:360–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Krayenbühl H, Yasargil MG, McClintock HG (1969) Treatment of spinal cord vascular malformations by surgical excision. J Neurosurg 30:427–435

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Malis LI (1979) Microsurgery for spinal cord arteriovenous malformations. Clin Neurosurg 26:543–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. McCutcheon IE, Doppman JL, Oldfield EH (1996) Microvascular anatomy of dural arteriovenous abnormalities of the spine: a microangiographic study. J Neurosurg 84:215–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Spetzler RF, Detwiler PW, Riina HA, Porter RW (2002) Modified classification of spinal cord vascular lesions. J Neurosurg 96(2 Suppl):145–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thron AK (1998) Vascular anatomy of the spinal cord. In: Thron AK (ed) Neuroradiologic investigations and clinical syndromes. Springer, New York, pp 72–89

    Google Scholar 

  8. Anson JA, Spetzler RF (1992) Classification of spinal arteriovenous malformations and implications for treatment. Barrow Neurol Inst Q 8:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aminoff MJ, Logue V (1974) The prognosis of patients with spinal vascular malformations. Brain 97:211–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi IS, Berenstein A (1988) Surgical neuroangiography of the spine and the spinal cord. Radiol Clin North Am 26:1131–1141

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundqvist C, Berthelsen M, Sullivan M, Svendsen P, Anderson O (1990) Spinal arteriovenous malformations: neurological aspects and results of embolization. Acta Neurol Scand 82:51–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Niimi Y, Berenstein A, Setton A, Neophytides A (1997) Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: results and follow-up. Neurosurgery 40:675–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Behrens S, Thron A (1999) Long-term follow-up and outcome in patients treated for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula. J Neurol 246:181–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huffmann BC, Gilsbach JM, Thron A (1995) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a plea for neurosurgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 135:44–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oldfield EH, Di Chiro G, Quindlen EA (1983) Successful treatment of a group of spinal cord arteriovenous malformations by interruption of dural fistula. J Neurosurg 59:1019–1030

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eskandar EN, Borges LF, Budzik RF Jr, Putman CM, Ogilvy CS (2002) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: experience with endovascular and surgical therapy. J Neurosurg 96(2 Suppl):162–167

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Song JK, Vinuela F, Gobin YP, Duckwiler GR, Murayama Y, Kureshi I, Frazee JG, Marin NA (2001) Surgical and endovascular treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: long-term disability assessment and prognostic factors. J Neurosurg 94(Suppl 2):199–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Dijk JM, Ter Brugge KG, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, Wallace MC (2002) Multidisciplinary management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical presentation and long-term follow-up in 49 patients. Stroke 33:1578–1583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, van Gijn J (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19:604–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee TL, Gromelski EB, Bowen BC, Green BA (1998) Diagnostic and surgical management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 43:242–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Steinmetz M, Chow M, Krishnaney A, Andrews-Hinders D, Benzel EC, Masaryk T, Mayberg M, Rasmussen P (2004) Outcome after the treatment of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: a contemporary single-institution series and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 55:77–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tacconi L, Lopez Izquierdo C, Symon L (1997) Outcome and prognostic factors in the surgical management of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a long-term study. Br J Neurosurg 11:298–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jellema K, Sluzewski M, van Rooij W, Tijssen C, Beute G (2005) Embolization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: importance of occlusion of the draining vein. J Neurosurg Spine 2:580–583

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hall W, Oldfield E, Doppman J (1989) Recanalization of spinal arteriovenous malformations following embolization. J Neurosurg 70:714–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan MK, Marsh W (1989) Management of spinal dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neuorsurg 70:832–836

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jellema K, Tijssen CC, van Gijn J (2006) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a congestive myelopathy that initially mimics a peripheral nerve disorder. Brain 129:3150–3164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Centazo M, Versari P, Righi C, Simionato F, Casali C, Giovanelli M (2004) Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae: analysis of outcome in relation to pre-treatment indicators. Neurosurgery 55:815–822

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camillo Sherif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherif, C., Gruber, A., Bavinzski, G. et al. Long-term outcome of a multidisciplinary concept of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae treatment. Neuroradiology 50, 67–74 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0303-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0303-4

Keywords

Navigation