Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders: is MRI obsolete?

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a severe demyelinating disease that preferentially involves spinal cord and optic nerve. It is part of a spectrum of neurological conditions associated with antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4). This study investigates the role of MRI where novel, more sensitive AQP4 antibody immunoassay techniques are being used.

Methods

Retrospective review of neuroimaging in 69 patients (25 antibody positive, 44 antibody negative), investigated in the context of suspected NMO or NMO spectrum disorder, was performed independently by two consultant neuroradiologists.

Results

Longitudinally extensive, central spinal cord lesions were more frequent in AQP4 positive patients (95.2% vs 35.5%, p < 0.0001; 85.7% vs 45.2%, p = 0.015). Multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria were less frequently fulfilled on brain MRI in antibody positive patients (5.6% vs 33.3%, p = 0.035). Juxtacortical and corpus callosal lesions were also less common in this group (16.7% vs 46.7%, p = 0.063; 5.6% vs 46.7%, p = 0.0034). Hypothalamic and periependymal disease related to the aqueduct was not seen in antibody negative patients. T1 hypointensity was more common in cord lesions of antibody positive patients (75.0% vs 35.3%, p = 0.037). However, this characteristic did not discriminate antibody positive and negative longitudinally extensive cord lesions (73.3% vs 62.5%, p = 0.66).

Conclusion

The NMO spectrum of diseases are among an increasing number of neurological conditions defined by serological tests. However, despite improved immunoassay techniques, MRI of the brain and spinal cord continues to be among the first-line investigations in these patients, providing valuable diagnostic information that will help guide patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miyazawa I, Fujihara K, Itoyama Y (2000) Eugène Devic (1858–1930). J Neurol 249(3):351–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lennon V, Wingerchuk D, Kryzer T, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, Fujihara K et al (2004) A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 364(9451):2106–2112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lennon V, Kryzer T, Pittock S, Verkman A, Hinson S (2005) IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 202(4):473–477

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jung J, Bhat R, Preston G, Guggino W, Baraban J, Agre P (1994) Molecular characterization of an aquaporin cDNA from brain: candidate osmoreceptor and regulator of water balance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(26):13052–13056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nico B, Frigeri A, Nicchia G, Quondamatteo F, Herken R, Errede M et al (2001) Role of aquaporin-4 water channel in the development and integrity of the blood–brain barrier. J Cell Sci 114(Pt 7):1297–1307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Waters P, Vincent A (2008) Detection of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica: current status of the assays. Int MS J 15(3):99–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wingerchuk D, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, Lennon V, Weinshenker B (2007) A secondary progressive clinical course is uncommon in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 68(8):603–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarius S, Aboul-Enein F, Waters P, Kuenz B, Hauser A, Berger T et al (2008) Antibody to aquaporin-4 in the long-term course of neuromyelitis optica. Brain 131(Pt 11):3072–3080

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Giovannoni G (2008) To test or not to test: NMO-IgG and optic neuritis. Neurology 70(23):2192–2193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matiello M, Lennon V, Jacob A, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, Wingerchuk D et al (2008) NMO-IgG predicts the outcome of recurrent optic neuritis. Neurology 70(23):2197–2200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinshenker B, Wingerchuk D, Vukusic S, Linbo L, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C et al (2006) Neuromyelitis optica IgG predicts relapse after longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Ann Neurol 59(3):566–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wingerchuk D, Hogancamp W, O’Brien P, Weinshenker B (1999) The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic’s syndrome). Neurology 53(5):1107–1114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wingerchuk D, Weinshenker B (2003) Neuromyelitis optica: clinical predictors of a relapsing course and survival. Neurology 60(5):848–853

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wingerchuk D, Lennon V, Pittock S, Lucchinetti C, Weinshenker B (2006) Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 66(10):1485–1489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wingerchuk D (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of neuromyelitis optica. Neurologist 13(1):2–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cañellas A, Gols A, Izquierdo J, Subirana M, Gairin X (2007) Idiopathic inflammatory-demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Neuroradiology 49(5):393–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Riordan J, Gallagher H, Thompson A, Howard R, Kingsley D, Thompson E et al (1996) Clinical, CSF, and MRI findings in Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60(4):382–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pittock S, Lennon V, Krecke K, Wingerchuk D, Lucchinetti C, Weinshenker B (2006) Brain abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica. Arch Neurol 63(3):390–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Polman C, Reingold S, Edan G, Filippi M, Hartung H, Kappos L et al (2005) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria”. Ann Neurol 58(6):840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pittock S, Weinshenker B, Lucchinetti C, Wingerchuk D, Corboy J, Lennon V (2006) Neuromyelitis optica brain lesions localized at sites of high aquaporin 4 expression. Arch Neurol 63(7):964–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Viegas S, Weir A, Esiri M, Kuker W, Waters P, Leite M et al (2009) Symptomatic, radiological and pathological involvement of the hypothalamus in neuromyelitis optica. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80(6):679–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Adoni T, Lino A, da Gama P, Apóstolos-Pereira S, Marchiori P, Kok F et al (2010) Recurrent neuromyelitis optica in Brazilian patients: clinical, immunological, and neuroimaging characteristics. Mult Scler 16(1):81–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Matsuoka T, Matsushita T, Kawano Y, Osoegawa M, Ochi H, Ishizu T et al (2007) Heterogeneity of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity and spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis in Japanese. Brain 130(Pt 5):1206–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Waters P, Jarius S, Littleton E, Leite MI, Jacob S, Gray B et al (2008) Aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Arch Neurol 65(7):913–919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Verhey LH, Branson HM, Makhija M, Shroff M, Banwell B (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging features of the spinal cord in pediatric multiple sclerosis: a preliminary study. Neuroradiology 52(12):1153–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Qiu W, Raven S, Wu JS, Bundell C, Hollingsworth P, Carroll WM et al (2010) Hypothalamic lesions in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry [Epub ahead of print]

  27. Losseff N, Wang L, Miller D, Thompson A (2001) T1 hypointensity of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 248(6):517–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Filippi M, Rocca M (2004) MR imaging of Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. Neurol Sci 25(Suppl 4):S371–S373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nakamura M, Miyazawa I, Fujihara K, Nakashima I, Misu T, Watanabe S et al (2008) Preferential spinal central gray matter involvement in neuromyelitis optica. MRI study. J Neurol 255(2):163–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sellner J, Boggild M, Clanet M, Hintzen RQ, Illes Z, Montalban X et al (2010) EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and management of neuromyelitis optica. Eur J Neurol 17(8):1019–1032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the consultant neurologists of the Nuffield Department of Neurosciences for referring patients, and Professor A Vincent and Dr P Waters for their research regarding AQP4 antibody detection.

Conflict of interest

J Palace has served on scientific advisory committees for Bayer Schering, Merck Serono, Teva and Biogen Idec, Novartis UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerardine Quaghebeur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Downer, J.J., Leite, M.I., Carter, R. et al. Diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders: is MRI obsolete?. Neuroradiology 54, 279–285 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0875-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-011-0875-x

Keywords

Navigation