Abstract
Endovascular revascularization techniques are increasingly used to treat arterial occlusions in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To monitor and communicate treatment results, a valid, reproducible, and clinically relevant, yet easy to use grading scheme of arterial recanalization and tissue reperfusion for digital subtraction angiography is needed. An ideal scoring system would consider the target arterial lesion, the perfusion deficit, and the collateral status before treatment and measure recanalization, reperfusion, early venous shunting, vasospasm, as well as distal embolization after flow restoration. Currently, a variety of different flow restoration scales are in use, including the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction scoring system, the Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, and the Arterial Occlusive Lesion score, which describe the local recanalization result. These scores are not used homogeneously throughout the literature, are often modified and not fully documented, which make them inept to compare treatment effects across studies. In addition, none of these scores cover all of the above-mentioned aspects, nor are they able to describe satisfactorily all relevant angiographic findings, and data on their reliability and predictive power regarding clinical outcome are sparse. We aimed to review and illustrate the different revascularization scales, discuss their advantages and limitations as well as the available data regarding standardization, reliability testing, and outcome prediction. In addition, we give examples for the use of the scales and show potential pitfalls.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rha J-H, Saver JL (2007) The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 38:967–973. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000258112.14918.24
Khatri P, Neff J, Broderick JP et al (2005) Revascularization end points in stroke interventional trials: recanalization versus reperfusion in IMS-I. Stroke 36:2400–2403. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185698.45720.58
Tomsick T (2007) TIMI, TIBI, TICI: I came, I saw, I got confused. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:382–384
Kallmes DF (2012) TICI: if you are not confused, then you are not paying attention. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:975–976. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2905
Zaidat OO, Lazzaro MA, Liebeskind DS et al (2012) Revascularization grading in endovascular acute ischemic stroke therapy. Neurology 79:S110–S116. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182695916
Saver JL, Albers GW, Dunn B et al (2009) Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) recommendations for extended window acute stroke therapy trials. Stroke 40:2594–2600. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552554
Saver JL, Liebeskind DS, Nogueira RG, Jahan R (2010) Need to clarify Thrombolysis In Myocardial Ischemia (TIMI) scale scoring method in the penumbra pivotal stroke trial. Stroke 41:e115–e116. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.566406
Soares BP, Chien JD, Wintermark M (2009) MR and CT monitoring of recanalization, reperfusion, and penumbra salvage: everything that recanalizes does not necessarily reperfuse! Stroke 40:S24–S27. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526814
Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Hendricks GH et al (2011) Mechanical characterization of thromboemboli in acute ischemic stroke and laboratory embolus analogs. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:1237–1244. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2485
Fugate JE, Klunder AM, Kallmes DF (2013) What is meant by “TICI”? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:1792–1797. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3496
Qureshi AI (2002) New grading system for angiographic evaluation of arterial occlusions and recanalization response to intra-arterial thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Neurosurgery 50:1405–1414, discussion 1414–5
Broderick JP, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM et al (2013) Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 368:893–903. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214300
Kidwell CS, Jahan R, Gornbein J et al (2013) A trial of imaging selection and endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 368:914–923. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1212793
Ciccone A, Valvassori L, Nichelatti M et al (2013) Endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 368:904–913. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1213701
Del Zoppo GJ, Ferbert A, Otis S et al (1988) Local intra-arterial fibrinolytic therapy in acute carotid territory stroke. A pilot study. Stroke 19:307–313. doi:10.1161/01.STR.19.3.307
Mori E, Tabuchi M, Yoshida T, Yamadori A (1988) Intracarotid urokinase with thromboembolic occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Stroke 19:802–812
Mori E, Yoneda Y, Tabuchi M et al (1992) Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in acute carotid artery territory stroke. Neurology 42:976–982
The TIMI Study Group (1985) The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. TIMI Study Group. N Engl J Med 312:932–936
Del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ et al (1998) PROACT: a phase II randomized trial of recombinant pro-urokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. PROACT Investigators. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. Stroke 29:4–11
Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L et al (1999) Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke. The PROACT II study: a randomized controlled trial. Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism. JAMA 282:2003–2011
Lewandowski CA, Frankel M, Tomsick TA et al (1999) Combined intravenous and intra-arterial r-TPA versus intra-arterial therapy of acute ischemic stroke: Emergency Management of Stroke (EMS) Bridging Trial. Stroke 30:2598–2605. doi:10.1161/01.STR.30.12.2598
Fields JD, Lutsep HL, Smith WS (2011) Higher degrees of recanalization after mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke are associated with improved outcome and decreased mortality: pooled analysis of the MERCI and Multi MERCI trials. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:2170–2174. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2709
Saver JL, Jahan R, Levy EI et al (2012) Solitaire flow restoration device versus the Merci Retriever in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 380:1241–1249. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61384-1
Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H et al (2003) Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 34:e109–e137. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09
IMS II Trial Investigators (2007) The Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) II Study. Stroke 38:2127–35. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.483131
Noser EA, Shaltoni HM, Hall CE et al (2005) Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke 36:292–296. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000152331.93770.18
Almekhlafi MA, Mishra S, Desai JA et al (2014) Not all “successful” angiographic reperfusion patients are an equal validation of a modified TICI scoring system. Interv Neuroradiol 20:21–27
Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P et al (2013) Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972
Türe U, Yaşargil MG, Al-Mefty O, Yaşargil DC (2000) Arteries of the insula. J Neurosurg 92:676–687. doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.4.0676
Khatri P, Broderick JP, Khoury JC et al (2008) Microcatheter contrast injections during intra-arterial thrombolysis may increase intracranial hemorrhage risk. Stroke 39:3283–3287. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.522904
Hui FK, Yim J, Spiotta AM et al (2012) Intermediate catheter injections in closed segments during acute stroke intervention: a cautionary note. J Neurointerv Surg 4:e39. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2011-010163
Liebeskind DS, Flint AC, Budzik RF et al (2014) Carotid I’s, L’s and T’s: collaterals shape the outcome of intracranial carotid occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011231
Nogueira RG, Lutsep HL, Gupta R et al (2012) Trevo versus Merci retrievers for thrombectomy revascularisation of large vessel occlusions in acute ischaemic stroke (TREVO 2): a randomised trial. Lancet 380:1231–1240. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61299-9
Dorn F, Kuntze-Soderqvist A, Popp S et al (2012) Early venous drainage after successful endovascular recanalization in ischemic stroke—a predictor for final infarct volume? Neuroradiology 54:745–751. doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0966-8
Ohta H, Nakano S, Yokogami K et al (2004) Appearance of early venous filling during intra-arterial reperfusion therapy for acute middle cerebral artery occlusion: a predictive sign for hemorrhagic complications. Stroke 35:893–898. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000119751.92640.7F
Ames A, Wright RL, Kowada M et al (1968) Cerebral ischemia. II. The no-reflow phenomenon. Am J Pathol 52:437–453
Soares BP, Tong E, Hom J et al (2010) Reperfusion is a more accurate predictor of follow-up infarct volume than recanalization: a proof of concept using CT in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 41:e34–e40. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.568766
Hussein HM, Georgiadis AL, Vazquez G et al (2010) Occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization following endovascular treatment among patients with acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:454–458. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2006
Bar M, Mikulik R, Jonszta T et al (2012) Diagnosis of recanalization of the intracranial artery has poor inter-rater reliability. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:972–974. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2896
Gaha M, Roy C, Estrade L et al (2014) Inter- and intraobserver agreement in scoring angiographic results of intra-arterial stroke therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3828
Suh SH, Cloft HJ, Fugate JE et al (2013) Clarifying differences among thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale variants: is the artery half open or half closed? Stroke 44:1166–1168. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000399
Yoo AJ, Simonsen CZ, Prabhakaran S et al (2013) Refining angiographic biomarkers of revascularization: improving outcome prediction after intra-arterial therapy. Stroke 44:2509–2512. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001990
Molina CA (2010) Futile recanalization in mechanical embolectomy trials: a call to improve selection of patients for revascularization. Stroke 41:842–843. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580266
Arnold M, Nedeltchev K, Schroth G et al (2004) Clinical and radiological predictors of recanalisation and outcome of 40 patients with acute basilar artery occlusion treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75:857–862
Schonewille WJ, Wijman CAC, Michel P et al (2009) Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): a prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol 8:724–730. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70173-5
Lindsberg PJ, Mattle HP (2006) Therapy of basilar artery occlusion: a systematic analysis comparing intra-arterial and intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 37:922–928. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000202582.29510.6b
Frölich AMJ, Psychogios MN, Klotz E et al (2012) Antegrade flow across incomplete vessel occlusions can be distinguished from retrograde collateral flow using 4-dimensional computed tomographic angiography. Stroke 43:2974–2979. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.668889
Ethical standards and patient consent
We declare that all human studies have been approved by our institutional Ethics Committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Due to the retrospective nature of this anonymized patient image and data study, patient consent was waived.
Conflict of interest
JG received personal fees and non-financial support from Penumbra Inc., non-financial support from Covidien and MicroVention Deutschland GmbH and personal fees from DePuy Codman and J&J Medical GmbH, all unrelated to the submitted work. YIM received personal fees from Synarc during the study. RVK received personal fees from Synarc, Lundbeck, Penumbra and Covidien, all unrelated to the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerber, J.C., Miaux, Y.J. & von Kummer, R. Scoring flow restoration in cerebral angiograms after endovascular revascularization in acute ischemic stroke patients. Neuroradiology 57, 227–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1460-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1460-x