Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment

  • Paediatric Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging is a quantitative imaging technique that measures inherent T1-relaxation, T2-relaxation, and proton density. These inherent tissue properties allow synthesis of various imaging sequences from a single acquisition. Clinical use of synthetic MR imaging has been described in adult populations. However, use of synthetic MR imaging has not been previously reported in children. The purpose of this study is to report our assessment of diagnostic image quality using synthetic MR imaging in children.

Methods

Synthetic MR acquisition was obtained in a sample of children undergoing brain MR imaging. Image quality assessments were performed on conventional and synthetic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Standardized linear measurements were performed on conventional and synthetic T2 images. Estimates of patient age based upon myelination patterns were also performed.

Results

Conventional and synthetic MR images were evaluated on 30 children. Using a 4-point assessment scale, conventional imaging performed better than synthetic imaging for T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. When the assessment was simplified to a dichotomized scale, the conventional and synthetic T1-weighted and T2-weighted images performed similarly. However, the superiority of conventional FLAIR images persisted in the dichotomized assessment. There were no statistically significant differences between linear measurements made on T2-weighted images. Estimates of patient age based upon pattern of myelination were also similar between conventional and synthetic techniques.

Conclusion

Synthetic MR imaging may be acceptable for clinical use in children. However, users should be aware of current limitations that could impact clinical utility in the software version used in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Riederer SJ, Suddarth SA, Bobman SA, Lee JN, Wang HZ, MacFall JR (1984) Automated MR image synthesis: feasibility studies. Radiology 153(1):203–206. doi:10.1148/radiology.153.1.6089265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bobman SA, Riederer SJ, Lee JN, Suddarth SA, Wang HZ, Drayer BP, MacFall JR (1985) Cerebral magnetic resonance image synthesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 6(2):265–269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Riederer SJ, Lee JN, Farzaneh F, Wang HZ, Wright RC (1986) Magnetic resonance image synthesis. Clinical implementation. Acta Radiol Suppl 369:466–468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Warntjes JB, Dahlqvist O, Lundberg P (2007) Novel method for rapid, simultaneous T1, T*2, and proton density quantification. Magn Reson Med: Off JSoc Magn Reson Med/ Soc Magn Reson Med 57(3):528–537. doi:10.1002/mrm.21165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Warntjes JB, Leinhard OD, West J, Lundberg P (2008) Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med: Off J Soc Magn Reson Med / Soc Magn Reson Med 60(2):320–329. doi:10.1002/mrm.21635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blystad I, Warntjes JB, Smedby O, Landtblom AM, Lundberg P, Larsson EM (2012) Synthetic MRI of the brain in a clinical setting. Acta radiologica 53(10):1158–1163. doi:10.1258/ar.2012.120195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Larsson HB, Frederiksen J, Kjaer L, Henriksen O, Olesen J (1988) In vivo determination of T1 and T2 in the brain of patients with severe but stable multiple sclerosis. Magn Res Med: Off J Soc Magn Reson Med / Soc Magn Reson Med 7(1):43–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson GD, Connelly A, Duncan JS, Grunewald RA, Gadian DG (1993) Detection of hippocampal pathology in intractable partial epilepsy: increased sensitivity with quantitative magnetic resonance T2 relaxometry. Neurology 43(9):1793–1799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernasconi A, Bernasconi N, Caramanos Z, Reutens DC, Andermann F, Dubeau F, Tampieri D, Pike BG, Arnold DL (2000) T2 relaxometry can lateralize mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in patients with normal MRI. NeuroImage 12(6):739–746. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Townsend TN, Bernasconi N, Pike GB, Bernasconi A (2004) Quantitative analysis of temporal lobe white matter T2 relaxation time in temporal lobe epilepsy. NeuroImage 23(1):318–324. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mamere AE, Saraiva LA, Matos AL, Carneiro AA, Santos AC (2009) Evaluation of delayed neuronal and axonal damage secondary to moderate and severe traumatic brain injury using quantitative MR imaging techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30(5):947–952. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Deoni SC (2010) Quantitative relaxometry of the brain. Top Magn Reson Imaging: TMRI 21(2):101–113. doi:10.1097/RMR.0b013e31821e56d8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasan KM, Walimuni IS, Abid H, Wolinsky JS, Narayana PA (2012) Multi-modal quantitative MRI investigation of brain tissue neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging : JMRI 35(6):1300–1311. doi:10.1002/jmri.23539

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonnier G, Roche A, Romascano D, Simioni S, Meskaldji D, Rotzinger D, Lin YC, Menegaz G, Schluep M, Du Pasquier R, Sumpf TJ, Frahm J, Thiran JP, Krueger G, Granziera C (2014) Advanced MRI unravels the nature of tissue alterations in early multiple sclerosis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 1(6):423–432. doi:10.1002/acn3.68

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonnier G, Roche A, Romascano D, Simioni S, Meskaldji DE, Rotzinger D, Lin YC, Menegaz G, Schluep M, Du Pasquier R, Sumpf TJ, Frahm J, Thiran JP, Krueger G, Granziera C (2015) Multicontrast MRI quantification of focal inflammation and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Biomed Res Int 2015:569123. doi:10.1155/2015/569123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Granziera C, Daducci A, Donati A, Bonnier G, Romascano D, Roche A, Bach Cuadra M, Schmitter D, Kloppel S, Meuli R, von Gunten A, Krueger G (2015) A multi-contrast MRI study of microstructural brain damage in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Neuroimage Clin 8:631–639. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.06.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. West J, Warntjes JB, Lundberg P (2012) Novel whole brain segmentation and volume estimation using quantitative MRI. Eur Radiol 22(5):998–1007. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2336-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron M. Betts.

Ethics declarations

We declare that all human and animal studies have been approved by the institutional review board and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Betts, A.M., Leach, J.L., Jones, B.V. et al. Brain imaging with synthetic MR in children: clinical quality assessment. Neuroradiology 58, 1017–1026 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1723-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1723-9

Keywords

Navigation