Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A systematic approach to vertebral hemangioma

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vertebral hemangiomas (VHs) are a frequent and often incidental finding on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the spine. When their imaging appearance is “typical” (coarsened vertical trabeculae on radiographic and CT images, hyperintensity on T1- and T2-weighted MR images), the radiological diagnosis is straightforward. Nonetheless, VHs might also display an “atypical” appearance on MR imaging because of their histological features (amount of fat, vessels, and interstitial edema). Although the majority of VHs are asymptomatic and quiescent lesions, they can exhibit active behaviors, including growing quickly, extending beyond the vertebral body, and invading the paravertebral and/or epidural space with possible compression of the spinal cord and/or nerve roots (“aggressive” VHs). These “atypical” and “aggressive” VHs are a radiological challenge since they can mimic primary bony malignancies or metastases. CT plays a central role in the workup of atypical VHs, being the most appropriate imaging modality to highlight the polka-dot appearance that is representative of them. When aggressive VHs are suspected, both CT and MR are needed. MR is the best imaging modality to characterize the epidural and/or soft-tissue component, helping in the differential diagnosis. Angiography is a useful imaging adjunct for evaluating and even treating aggressive VHs. The primary objectives of this review article are to summarize the clinical, pathological, and imaging features of VHs, as well as the treatment options, and to provide a practical guide for the differential diagnosis, focusing on the rationale assessment of the findings from radiography, CT, and MR imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodallec MH, Feydy A, Larousserie F, Anract P, Campagna R, Babinet A, et al. Diagnostic imaging of solitary tumors of the spine: what to do and say. Radiographics. 2008;28(4):1019–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huvos AG. Hemangioma, lymphangioma, angiomatosis/lymphangiomatosis, glomus tumor. In: Huvos AG, editor. Bone tumors: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991. p. 553–78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baudrez V, Galant C, Vande Berg BC. Benign vertebral hemangioma: MR-histological correlation. Skelet Radiol. 2001;30(8):442–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang L, Liu XG, Yuan HS, Yang SM, Li J, Wei F, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of vertebral hemangiomas with neurologic deficit: a report of 29 cases and literature review. Spine J. 2014;14(6):944–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Murphey MD, Fairbairn KJ, Parman LM, Baxter KG, Parsa MB, Smith WS. From the archives of the AFIP. Musculoskeletal angiomatous lesions: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 1995;15(4):893–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross JJ, Antoun NM, Laing RJ, Xuereb J. Imaging of compressive vertebral haemangiomas. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(6):997–1002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander J, Meir A, Vrodos N, Yau YH. Vertebral hemangioma: an important differential in the evaluation of locally aggressive spinal lesions. Spine. 2010;35(18):E917–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laredo JD, Reizine D, Bard M, Merland JJ. Vertebral hemangiomas: radiologic evaluation. Radiology. 1986;161(1):183–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Campanacci M. Hemangioma. In: Campanacci M, editors. Bone and soft tissue tumors. Padova: Piccin Nuova Libraria & Wien: Springer; 1999. p. 599–618.

  10. Hameed M, Wold LE. Haemangioma. In: Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn P, Mertens F, editors. WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2013. p. 332.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karlin CA, Brower AC. Multiple primary hemangiomas of bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;129(1):162–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman DP. Symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(2):359–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laredo JD, Assouline E, Gelbert F, Wybier M, Merland JJ, Tubiana JM. Vertebral hemangiomas: fat content as a sign of aggressiveness. Radiology. 1990;l77(2):467–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart JL, Edgar MA, Gardner JM. Vascular tumors of bone. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2014;31(1):30–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dorfman HD, Czerniak B. Vascular lesions. In: Dorfman HD, Czerniak B, editors. Bone tumors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 729–814.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Elgazzar AH. Musculoskeletal system. In: Synopsis of pathophysiology in nuclear medicine. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 90–2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi YY, Kim JY, Yang SO. PET/CT in benign and malignant musculoskeletal tumors and tumor-like conditions. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(2):133–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brogsitter C, Hofmockel T, Kotzerke J. (68)Ga DOTATATE uptake in vertebral hemangioma. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39(5):462–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Basu S, Nair N. “Cold” vertebrae on F-18 FDG PET: causes and characteristics. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31(8):445–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perman E. On haemangiomata in the spinal column. Acta Chit Scand. 1926;61:91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Carter JR, Mapstone T, Dengel FH. Vertebral hemangiomas: MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;165(1):165–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Persaud T. The polka-dot sign. Radiology. 2008;246(3):980–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen JP, Djindjian M, Gaston A, Gherardi R, Benhaiem N, Caron JP, et al. Vertebral hemangiomas presenting with neurologic symptoms. Surg Neurol. 1987;27(4):391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gaston A, Nguyen JP, Djindjian M, Le Bras F, Gherardi R, Benhaiem N, et al. Vertebral haemangioma: CT and arteriographic features in three cases. J Neuroradiol. 1985;12(1):21–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Modic MT, Steinberg PM, Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Carter JR. Degenerative disk disease: assessment of changes in vertebral body marrow with MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;166(1 Pt 1):193–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuisma M, Karppinen J, Niinimäki J, Kurunlahti M, Haapea M, Vanharanta H, et al. A three-year follow-up of lumbar spine endplate (Modic) changes. Spine. 2006;31(15):1714–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Casamassima F, Ruggiero C, Caramella D, Tinacci E, Villari N, Ruggiero M. Hematopoietic bone marrow recovery after radiation therapy: MRI evaluation. Blood. 1989;73(6):1677–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hanrahan CJ, Shah LM. MRI of spinal bone marrow: part 2, T1-weighted imaging-based differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(6):1309–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stevens SK, Moore SG, Kaplan ID. Early and late bone-marrow changes after irradiation: MR evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(4):745–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blankstein A, Spiegelmann R, Shacked I, Schinder E, Chechick A. Hemangioma of the thoracic spine involving multiple adjacent levels: case report. Paraplegia. 1988;26(3):186–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanrahan CJ, Christensen CR, Crim JR. Current concepts in the evaluation of multiple myeloma with MR imaging and FDG PET/CT. Radiographics. 2010;30(1):127–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah LM, Salzman KL. Imaging of spinal metastatic disease. Int J Surg Oncol. 2011;2011:769–53.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Abdel-Wanis ME, Solyman MT, Hasan NM. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating vertebral compression fractures caused by malignancy, osteoporosis, and infections. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011;19(2):145–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Herneth AM, Philipp MO, Naude J, Funovics M, Beichel RR, Bammer R, et al. Vertebral metastases: assessment with apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology. 2002;225(3):889–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stäbler A, Baur A, Bartl R, Munker R, Lamerz R, Reiser MF. Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(4):1029–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baur A, Stäbler A, Bartl R, Lamerz R, Reiser M. Infiltration patterns of plasmacytomas in magnetic resonance tomography. Röfo. 1996;164(6):457–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Libshitz HI, Malthouse SR, Cunningham D, MacVicar AD, Husband JE. Multiple myeloma: appearance at MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;182(3):833–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vidal JA, Murphey MD. Primary tumors of the osseous spine. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2007;15(2):239–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Walker R, Barlogie B, Haessler J, Tricot G, Anaissie E, Shaughnessy Jr JD, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma: diagnostic and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(9):1121–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Major NM, Helms CA, Richardson WJ. The “mini brain”: plasmacytoma in a vertebral body on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175(1):261–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wippold 2nd FJ, Koeller KK, Smirniotopoulos JG. Clinical and imaging features of cervical chordoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172(5):1423–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leone A, Cerase A, Tarquini E, Mulè A. Chordoma of the low cervical spine presenting with Horner’s syndrome. Eur Radiol. 2002;12 Suppl 3:S43–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Laredo JD, el Quessar A, Bossard P, Vuillemin-Bodaghi V. Vertebral tumors and pseudotumors. Radiol Clin N Am. 2001;39(1):137–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mulligan ME, McRae GA, Murphey MD. Imaging features of primary lymphoma of bone. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173(6):1691–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. O’Connell JX, Nielsen GP, Rosenberg AE. Epithelioid vascular tumors of bone: a review and proposal of a classification scheme. Adv Anat Pathol. 2001;8(2):74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wenger DE, Wold LE. Malignant vascular lesions of bone: radiologic and pathologic features. Skelet Radiol. 2000;29(11):619–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Verbeke SL, Bovée JV. Primary vascular tumors of bone: a spectrum of entities? Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(6):541–51.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dang L, Liu C, Yang SM, Jiang L, Liu ZJ, Liu XG, et al. Aggressive vertebral hemangioma of the thoracic spine without typical radiological appearance. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(10):1994–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kato S, Kawahara N, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Okayama T, et al. Surgical management of aggressive vertebral hemangiomas causing spinal cord compression: long- term clinical follow-up of five cases. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15(3):350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Heyd R, Seegenschmiedt MH, Rades D, Winkler C, Eich HT, Bruns F, et al. Radiotherapy for symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: results of a multicenter study and literature review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77(1):217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Guarnieri G, Ambrosanio G, Vassallo P, Pezzullo MG, Galasso R, Lavanga A, et al. Vertebroplasty as treatment of aggressive and symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: up to 4 years of follow-up. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(7):471–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Doppman JL, Oldfield EH, Heiss JD. Symptomatic vertebral hemangiomas: treatment by means of direct intralesional injection of ethanol. Radiology. 2000;214(2):341–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S, Yoshioka K, Kato S. Total en bloc spondylectomy of the lower lumbar spine: a surgical techniques of combined posterior-anterior approach. Spine. 2011;36(1):74–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Libero Lauriola for providing histological data and Dr. Alessandro Pedicelli for providing angiographic images.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simona Gaudino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaudino, S., Martucci, M., Colantonio, R. et al. A systematic approach to vertebral hemangioma. Skeletal Radiol 44, 25–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2035-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-014-2035-y

Keywords

Navigation