Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the relationship between the amount of radiation exposure to the operator during tableside manual-injection angiographic procedures including digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and the operator’s position, as well as a simple means to decrease radiation exposure.
Methods: Measurement of radiation exposure was carried out with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in nine abdominal angiographies. In the first study, radiation exposure during DSA or during fluoroscopy was measured using TLDs placed near the angiographic table. In the second study, radiation exposure to the interventional radiologist was measured during manual-injection DSA at a near and a far operator position.
Results: Radiation exposure to the operator received during manual-injection DSA accounted for more than 90% of the total procedural exposure. The exposure to the operator markedly decreased at the far position compared with that at the near position when performing DSA.
Conclusion: Manual-injection DSA is the largest contributor to radiation exposure received by the interventional radiologist, therefore, the use of a power injector is always recommended when performing DSA. When manual-injection DSA is necessary, radiologists should position themselves as far away from the patient as possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NCRP (1990) Implementation of the principle of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel. NCRP Report no. 107. Bethesda, Maryland
Balter S, Sones M, Brancato R (1978) Radiation exposure to the operator performing cardiac angiography with C-arm systems. Circulation 58(5):925–932
Riley RC, Birks JW, Palacios E, Templeton AW (1973) Exposure of radiologists during special procedures. Radiology 104:679–683
Chopp M, Portnoy HD, Schuvig R, Croissant P (1980) Clinical dosimetry during cerebral arteriography. Neuroardiology 20:74–81
Tryhus M, Mettler FA, Kalsey C (1987) The radiologist and angiographic procedures: Absorbed radiation dose. Invest Radiol 22:747–750
Cascade PN, Peterson LE, Wajszczuk WJ, Mantel J (1987) Radiation exposure to patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 59:996–997
Calkins H, Niklason L, Sousa J, El Attasi R, Langberg J, Morady F (1991) Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory arterioventricular connections. Circulation 84:2376–2382
Berthelsen B, Cederblad A (1991) Radiation doses to patients and personnel involved in embolization of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations. Acta Radiol 32:492–497
Wagner LK, Eifel PJ, Geise RA (1994) Potential biological effects following high X-ray dose interventional procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 5:71–84
Judkins MP (1984) Guidelines for radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 10:87–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayashi, N., Sakai, T., Kitagawa, M. et al. Radiation exposure to interventional radiologists during manual-injection digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21, 240–243 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900252
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900252