Abstract
Three-dimensional reconstructions represent a visual-based tool for illustrating the basis of three-dimensional post-processing such as interpolation, ray-casting, segmentation, percentage classification, gradient calculation, shading and illumination. The knowledge of the optimal scanning and reconstruction parameters facilitates the use of three-dimensional reconstruction techniques in clinical practise. The aim of this article is to explain the principles of multidimensional image processing in a pictorial way and the advantages and limitations of the different possibilities of 3D visualisation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mahesh M (2002) Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. Radiographics 22:949–962
Ferretti GR, Bricault I, Coulomb M (2001) Virtual tools for imaging of the thorax. Eur Respir J 18:381–392
Grenier PA, Beigelman-Aubry C, Fetita C et al. (2002) New frontiers in CT imaging of airway disease. Eur Radiol 12:1022–1044
van Ooijen PM, Ho KY, Dorgelo J, Oudkerk M (2003) Coronary artery imaging with multidetector CT: visualization issues. Radiographics 23:e16
Lichtenbelt B, Crane R, Naqvi S (1998) Introduction to volume rendering. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G (1992) Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 185:29–35
Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P (1990) Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 176:181–183
Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG et al. (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19:745–764
Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB Jr et al. (2000) Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:179–188
Semba CP, Rubin GD, Dake MD (1994) Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 15:133–138
Sato Y, Shiraga N, Nakajima S et al. (1998) Local maximum intensity projection (LMIP): a new rendering method for vascular visualization. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:912–917
Udupa JK (1999) Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current perspective. Radiographics 19:783–806
Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR et al. (1991) Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology 181:321–337
Hohne KH, Hanson WA (1992) Interactive 3D segmentation of MRI and CT volumes using morphological operations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:285-294
Masutani Y, MacMahon H, Doi K (2001) Automated segmentation and visualization of the pulmonary vascular tree in spiral CT angiography: an anatomy-oriented approach based on three-dimensional image analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:587–597
Clarke LP, Velthuizen RP, Camacho MA et al. (1995) MRI segmentation: methods and applications. Magn Reson Imaging 13:343–368
Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB et al. (1998) Automated flight path planning for virtual endoscopy. Med Phys 25:629–637
Frericks BB, Caldarone FC, Nashan B et al. (2004) 3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation. Eur Radiol 14:326–333
Luccichenti G, Cademartiri F, Cobelli R, Pavone P (2003) Assessment of organ volume with different techniques using a living liver model. Eur Radiol 13:1286–1290
Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, Pusanik LM et al. (2000) Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 216:284–290
Zhang Z, Wang G, Brown BP et al. (2000) Fast algorithm for soft straightening of the colon. Acad Radiol 7:142–148
Masutani Y, Yoshida H, MacEneaney PM, Dachman AH (2001) Automated segmentation of colonic walls for computerized detection of polyps in CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:629–638
Yen SY, Rubin GD, Napel S (1999) Spatially varying longitudinal aliasing and resolution in spiral computed tomography. Med Phys 26:2617–2625
Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Paik DS et al. (2000) Stair-step artifacts with single versus multiple detector-row helical CT. Radiology 216:185–196
Hopper KD, Pierantozzi D, Potok PS et al. (1996) The quality of 3D reconstructions from 1.0 and 1.5 pitch helical and conventional CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:841–847
Wang G, Vannier MW (1994) Stair-step artifacts in three-dimensional helical CT: an experimental study. Radiology 191:79–83
Kalender WA, Polacin A, Suss C (1994) A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: an experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:167–176
Brink JA, Heiken JP, Balfe DM et al. (1992) Spiral CT: decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile. Radiology 185:469–474
Khan MF, Herzog C, Ackermann H et al. (2004) Virtual endoscopy of the tracheo–bronchial system: sub-millimeter collimation with the 16-row multidetector scanner. Eur Radiol 14:1400–1405
Hu H, Fox SH (1996) The effect of helical pitch and beam collimation on the lesion contrast and slice profile in helical CT imaging. Med Phys 23:1943–1954
Beaulieu CF, Napel S, Daniel BL et al. (1998) Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:656–663
Hu H (1999) Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys 26:5–18
Wang G, Vannier MW (1996) Maximum volume coverage in spiral computed tomography scanning. Acad Radiol 3:423–428
Hopper KD, Iyriboz TA, Mahraj RP et al. (1998) CT bronchoscopy: optimization of imaging parameters. Radiology 209:872–877
Brink JA (1995) Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT. Radiol Clin North Am 33:825–841
Wildberger JM, Mahnken AM, Flohr T et al. (2003) Spatial domain image filtering in computed tomography: feasibility study in pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 13:717–723
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luccichenti, G., Cademartiri, F., Pezzella, F.R. et al. 3D reconstruction techniques made easy: know-how and pictures. Eur Radiol 15, 2146–2156 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2738-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2738-5