Skip to main content
Log in

The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our goal was to determine the value of echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting the presence of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma. One hundred patients were evaluated by preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. The patient population consisted of a first group of 55 patients evaluated in order to detect the presence of a primary acquired cholesteatoma. In the second group, 45 patients were evaluated for the presence of a residual cholesteatoma 8–18 months after cholesteatoma surgery, prior to second-look surgery. Surgical findings were compared with preoperative findings on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of both groups was assessed. In the group of primary surgery patients, hyperintense signal compatible with cholesteatoma was found in 89% of cases with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for DWI of 81, 100, 100 and 40%, respectively. In the group of second-look surgery patients, only one of seven surgically verified residual cases was correctly diagnosed using DWI, with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 12.5, 100, 100 and 72%, respectively. These results confirm the value of DWI in detecting primary cholesteatoma, but show the poor capability of DWI in detecting small residual cholesteatoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tierney PA, Pracy P, Blaney SP, Bowdler DA (1999) An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic ‘second look’ in intact canal wall mastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 24:274–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blaney SP, Tierney P, Oyarazabal M, Bowdler DA (2000) CT scanning in “second look” combined approach tympanoplasty. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 121:79–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wake M, Robinson JM, Witcombe JB, Bazerbachi S, Stansbie JM, Phelps PD (1992) Detection of recurrent cholesteatoma by computerized tomography after ‘closed cavity’ mastoid surgery. J Laryngol Otol 106:393–395

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Denoyelle F, Silberman B, Garabedian E (1994) Value of magnetic resonance imaging associated with X-ray computed tomography in the screening of residual cholesteatoma after primary surgery. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 111:85–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kimitsuki T, Suda Y, Kawano H, Tono T, Komune S (2001) Correlation between MRI findings and second-look operation in cholesteatoma surgery. ORL J Otorinolaryngol Relat Spec 63:291–293

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vanden Abeele D, Coen E, Parizel PM, Van de Heyning P (1999) Can MRI replace a second look operation in cholesteatoma surgery? Acta Otolaryngol 119:555–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Williams MT, Ayache D, Alberti C, Heran F, Lafitte F, Elmaleh-Berges M, Piekarski JD (2003) Detection of postoperative residual cholesteatoma with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging initial findings. Eur Radiol 13:169–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ayache D, Wiliams MT, Lejeune D, Corre A (2005) Usefulness of delayed postcontrast magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of residual cholesteatoma after canal wall-up tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 115:607–610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aikele P, Kittner T, Offergeld C, Kaftan H, Huttenbrink KB, Laniado M (2003) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of cholesteatoma in pediatric and adult patients who have undergone middle ear surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:261–265

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fitzek C, Mewes T, Fitzek S, Mentzel HJ, Hunsche S, Stoeter P (2002) Diffusion-weighted MRI of cholesteatomas of the petrous bone. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:636–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maheshwari S, Mukherji SK (2002) Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after mastoidectomy: case report. Am J Neuroradiol 23:847–849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mark AS, Casselman JW (2001) Anatomy and disease of the temporal bone. In: Atlas SW (ed) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1363–1432

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Foer B, Casselman JW, Govaere F, Vercruysse JP, Pouillon M, Somers T, Offeciers E (2002) The role of MRI and diffusion-weighted images in the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma. Acta Radiol Port 14:89 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stasolla A, Magluilo G, Parrotto D, Luppi G, Marini M (2004) Detection of postoperative relapsing/residual cholesteatomas with diffusion-weighted echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Otol Neurotol 25:879–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin N, Sterkers O, Nahum H (1990) Chronic inflammatory disease of the middle ear cavities: Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 176:399–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ishii K, Takahashi S, Kobayashi T, Matsumoto K, Ishibashi T (1991) MR imaging of middle ear cholesteatomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:934–937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Robert Y, Carcasset S, Rocourt N, Hennequin C, Dubrulle F, Lemaitre L (1995) Congenital cholesteatoma of the temporal bone: MR findings and comparison with CT. Am J Neuroradiol 16:755–761

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lansberg MG, Norbash AM, Marks MP, Tong DC, Moseley ME, Albers GW (2000) Advantages of adding diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to conventional magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating acute stroke. Arch Neurol 57:1311–1316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK, Chung T, Muthupillai R, Van Cauteren M, Yamada K, Dymarkowski S, Bogaert J, Maki JH, Matos C, Casselman JW, Hoogeveen RM (2003) Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 46:3–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Philippe Vercruysse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vercruysse, JP., De Foer, B., Pouillon, M. et al. The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients. Eur Radiol 16, 1461–1467 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0160-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0160-2

Keywords

Navigation