Skip to main content
Log in

Delineation of temporal bone anatomy: feasibility of low-dose 64-row CT in regard to image quality

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our present study was to evaluate the visualization of anatomical landmarks of the temporal bone using a low-dose 64-slice computed tomography (CT) technique. A total of 120 patients were evaluated, 60 patients (mean age 47.1 years; 36 male, 24 female) underwent examination with a 4-slice CT scanner: 180 mAs, 120 kV, 1 s rotation time, 2 × 0.5 mm collimation, 0.5 mm slice thickness. Another 60 consecutive patients (mean age 37.4 years; 43 male, 37 female) were examined using a 64-slice CT low-dose protocol: 140 mAs, 120 kV, 1 s rotation time, 12 × 0.6 mm collimation, 0.6 mm slice thickness. The visibility of 42 landmarks was scored by two blinded radiologists using a five-point quality rating scale. Mean equivalent dose was significantly lower for the 64-slice CT protocol (0.31 mSv ± 0.12 mSv) compared to the 4-slice CT protocol (0.61 mSv ± 0.08 mSv). Despite increased image noise, only 19% of the anatomical landmarks were delineated significantly better on the axial sections of the 4-slice CT and only 9.5% of the anatomical landmarks on the reformatted coronal images. The interobserver agreement did not differ significantly between the two modalities. Low-dose 64-slice CT technique facilitates temporal bone imaging with sufficient anatomical detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chakeres DW, Augustyn MA (2003) Temporal bone imaging. In: Som PM, Curtin HD (eds) Head and neck imaging, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, pp 1093–1108

    Google Scholar 

  2. Virapongse C, Rothman SLG, Kier EL, Sarwar M (1982) Computed tomographic anatomy of the temporal bone. Am J Roentgenol 139:739–749

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer TE, Brueckmann H, Siegert R, Witt A, Weerda H (1997) High resolution CT of the temporal bone in dysplasia of the auricle and external auditory canal. Am J Neuroradiol 18:53–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lemmerling MM, Stambuck HE, Mancuso AA, Antonelli PJ, Kubilis PS (1997) CT of the normal suspensory ligaments of the ossicles in the middle ear. Am J Neuroradiol 18:471–477

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Westerhof JP, Rademaker J, Weber BP, Becker H (2001) Congenital malformations of the inner ear and vestibulocochlear nerve in children with sensorineural hearing loss: evaluation with CT and MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:719–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klingenbeck-Regn K, Schaller S, Flohr T et al (1993) Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and application. Eur J Radiol 31:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Flohr T, Stiersdorfer K, Bruder H, Simon J, Staller S (2002) New technical developments in multislice CT. Part 1: Approaching isotropic resolution with sub-mm 16 slice scanning (in German). Fortschr Röntgenstr 174:839–845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Flohr T, Stiersdorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H (2004) Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot (in German). Fortschr Röntgenstr 176:1803–1810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohnen M, Fischer H, Hamacher J, Lins E, Kotter R, Modder U (2000) CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relation between image quality and dose reduction. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1654–1660

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coppenrath E, Meindl T, Herzog P, Khalil R, Mueller-Lisse U, Krenn L, Reiser M, Mueller-Lisse UG (2006) Dose reduction in multidetector CT of the urinary tract. Studies in a phantom model. Eur Radiol 16:1982–1989

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE, Leidecker C, Suss C, Schmidt T, Gunther RW, Mahnken AH (2006) Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 16(8):1841–1846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, van Merten EP (1999) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Report EUR 16262EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  13. Hamberg LM, Rhea JT, Hunter GJ, Thrall JH (2003) Multi-detector row CT: radiation dose characteristics. Radiology 226:762–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marmolya G, Wiesen EJ, Yagan R, Haria CD, Shah AC (1991) Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT. Radiology 181:689–691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sohaib SA, Peppercorn PD, Horrocks JA, Keene MH, Kenyon GS, Reznek RH (2001) The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT. Br J Radiol 74:157–161

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hein E, Rogalla P, Klingebiel R, Hamm B (2002) Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye lense protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 12:1693–1696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tack D, Widelec J, Maertelaer V, Baily JM, Delcous C, Gevenois PA (2003) Comparison between low-dose and standard-dose multidetector CT in patients with suspected chronic sinusitis. Am J Roentgenol 181:939–944

    Google Scholar 

  18. Takahashi M, Maguire WM, Ashtari M, Khan A, Papp Z, Alberico R, Campbell W, Eacobacci T, Hernan PG (1998) Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard dose technique. Invest Radiol 33:68–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S, Blake MA, Varghese J, Halpern EF, Thrall JW, Rhea JT (2002) Clinical comparison of standard dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. Am J Roentgenol 179:1101–1106

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kamel IR, Hernandez RJ, Martin JE, Schlesinger AE, Niklason LT, Guire KE (1994) Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis. Radiology 190:683–687

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mullins ME, Lev MH, Bove P (2004) Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. Am J Neuroradiol 25:533–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lorenzen M, Wedegärtner U, Weber C, Lockermann U, Adam G, Lorenzen J (2005) Dose optimization for multislice computed tomography protocols of the midface (in German). Fortschr Röntgenstr 177:265–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee CP, Black ML, Lamb RB, Arnold JP, Seibert JA, Chole RA, Bacon GV (1989) CT evaluation of the temporal bone ossicles by using oblique reformations. Am J Neuroradiol 10:431–433

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Husstedt HW, Prokop M, Dietrich B, Becker H (2001) Low-dose high-resolution CT of the petrous bone. J Neuroradiol 27:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  25. Krombach GA, van den Boom M, Di Martino E (2005) Computed tomography of the inner ear: size of anatomical structures in the normal temporal bone and in the temporal bone of patients with Maniere’s disease. Eur Radiol 15:1505–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jäger L, Bonell H, Liebl M, Srivastav S, Arbusov V, Hempel M, Reiser M (2005) CT of the normal temporal bone: comparison of multi- and single-detector row CT. Radiology 235:133–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta R, Bartling SH, Basu SK, Ross WR, Becker H, Pfoh A, Brady T, Curtin HD (2004) Experimental flat-panel high resolution volume CT of the temporal bone. Am J Neuroradiol 25:1417–1424

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jäger L, Reiser M (2001) CT and MR imaging of the normal and pathologic conditions of the facial nerve. Eur J Radiol 40:133–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Helms J (1981) Variations of the course of the facial nerve in the middle ear and mastoid. In: Samii M, Janetta PJ (eds) The cranial nerves. Springer, Berlin, pp 391–393

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dimopoulos PA, Muren C, Smedby O, Wadin K (1996) Anatomical variations of the tympanic and mastoid portions of the facial nerve canal: a radioanatomical investigation. Acta Radiol Suppl 403:49–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Lutz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, J., Jäger, V., Hempel, M.J. et al. Delineation of temporal bone anatomy: feasibility of low-dose 64-row CT in regard to image quality. Eur Radiol 17, 2638–2645 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0578-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0578-1

Keywords

Navigation