Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The utility of measuring the corpus callosal angle (CA) for the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) was investigated. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 34 INPH patients, 34 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients, and 34 normal control (NC) subjects. Measurement of the CA on the coronal MR images of the posterior commissure perpendicular to the anteroposterior commissure plane was performed for all subjects. The CA of the INPH group (mean ± SD, 66 ± 14°) was significantly smaller than those of the AD (104 ± 15°) and NC (112 ± 11°) groups. When using the threshold of the mean − 2SD value of the NC group (= 90°), an accuracy of 93%, sensitivity of 97%, and specificity of 88% were observed for discrimination of INPH from AD patients. Measuring the CA helps in differentiating INPH patients from AD and normally aged subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams RD, Fisher CM, Hakim S, Ojemann RG, Sweet WH (1965) Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure, a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 273:117–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hakim S, Adams RD (1965) The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Neurol Sci 273:307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vassilouthis J (1984) The syndrome of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 61:501–509

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pappadà G, Poletti C, Guazzoni A, Sani R, Colli M (1986) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: relationship among clinical picture, CT scan and intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg Sci 30:115–121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caruso R, Cervoni L, Vitale AM, Salvati M (1997) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in adults: result of shunting correlated with clinical findings in 18 patients and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 20:104–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holodny AI, Waxman R, George AE, Rusinek H, Kalnin AJ, de Leon M (1998) MR differential diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease: significance of perihippocampal fissures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:813–819

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, Yamaji S, Hirono N, Imamura T (1998) CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus; morphology and volumetry. AJR Am J Roentgenol 19:1277–1284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishii K, Kawaguchi T, Shimada K et al (2008) Voxel-based analysis of gray matter and CSF space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 25:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Relkin N, Marmarou A, Klinge P, Bergsneider M, Black PM (2005) Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57(S2):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ishikawa M (2004) Clinical guideline for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 44:222–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 34:939–944

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Orrison WW Jr (1998) Neuroimaging. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, Hurtig HI, Zimmerman RA (1987) MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 149:351–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Benson DF, LeMay M, Patten DH, Rubens AB (1970) Diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. N Engl J Med 283:609–615

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sjaastad O, Nordvik A (1973) The corpus callosal angle in the diagnosis of cerebral ventricular enlargement. Acta Neurol Scand 49:396–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bradley WG Jr, Whittemore AR, Watanabe AS, Davis SJ, Teresi LM, Homyak M (1991) Association of deep white matter infarction with chronic communicating hydrocephalus: implications regarding the possible origin of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12:31–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kristensen B, Malm J, Fagerland M et al (1996) Regional cerebral blood flow, white matter abnormalities, and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 60:282–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krauss JK, Regel JP, Vach W et al (1997) White matter lesions in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and in an age-matched control group: a comparative study. Neurosurgery 40:491–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixon GR, Friedman JA, Luetmer PH et al (2002) Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc 77:509–514

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tullberg M, Jensen C, Ekholm S, Wikkelso C (2001) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1665–1673

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tullberg M, Hultin L, Ekholm S, Mansson JE, Fredman P, Wikkelso C (2002) White matter changes in normal pressure hydrocephalus and Binswanger disease: specificity, predictive value and correlations to axonal degeneration and demyelination. Acta Neurol Scand 105:417–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jack CR Jr, Mokri B, Laws ER Jr, Houser OW, Baker HL Jr, Petersen RC (1987) MR findings in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: significance and comparison with other forms of dementia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 11:923–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bradley WG Jr, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE et al (1991) Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology 178:459–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krauss JK, Droste DW, Vach W et al (1996) Cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: effect of periventricular and deep white matter lesions. Neurosurgery 39:292–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazunari Ishii.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishii, K., Kanda, T., Harada, A. et al. Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 18, 2678–2683 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4

Keywords

Navigation