Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of thyroid-associated orbitopathy: getting below the tip of the iceberg

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare extraocular muscles (EOMs) T2, post-contrast T1 (T1Gad) signal intensity ratios (SIRs) and normalized-apparent diffusion coefficient (n-ADC) values in patients with thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO) at different phases of activity and severity and correlate MRI modifications to clinical evolution during follow-up.

Methods

A total of 74 TAO patients were classified as active or inactive on the basis of the clinical activity score (CAS). Severity of EOM impairment was evaluated by assigning a functional score to each rectus. T2, T1Gad SIRs and n-ADC of EOMs were compared in patients with active inflammation, those with inactive disease and 26 healthy controls, and correlated with clinical scores. MRI parameter variation was correlated with clinical modifications during follow-up.

Results

All MRI parameters in TAO EOMs were significantly higher than in healthy subjects and correlated with muscle dysfunction and CAS. EOMs of active patients showed higher T2 and T1Gad SIRs than those with inactive disease. The T2 SIR and n-ADC of normally functioning TAO EOMs were higher than those of healthy controls. SIRs decreased in clinically improved and clinically stable EOMs after therapy.

Conclusions

T2 SIR, T1Gad SIR and n-ADC are objective measures of activity and severity of EOMs in TAO patients. MRI shows clinically silent muscle involvement and modifications.

Key Points

MRI and DWI measures are objective, quantitative parameters of TAO activity and severity

MRI and DWI measures significantly correlate with clinical scores in TAO patients

MRI and DWI can identify clinically silent inflammation of deep orbital structures

MRI and DWI can depict subclinical modifications during follow-up

MRI and DWI may aid clinicians in choosing the most appropriate treatment

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADC:

apparent diffusion coefficient

CAS:

clinical activity score

CT:

computed tomography

DWI:

diffusion-weighted imaging

EOM:

extraocular muscle

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

n-ADC:

normalized apparent diffusion coefficient

ROI:

region of interest

SIR:

signal–intensity ratio

TAO:

thyroid-associated orbitopathy

T1Gad:

post-contrast T1

References

  1. Dickinson AJ, Perros P (2001) Controversies in the clinical evaluation of active thyroid-associated orbitopathy: use of a detailed protocol with comparative photographs for objective assessment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 55:283–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartalena L, Tanda ML (2009) Graves' ophthalmopathy. N Engl J Med 360:994–1001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parmar H, Ibrahim M (2008) Extrathyroidal manifestations of thyroid disease: thyroid ophthalmopathy. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 18:527–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Kaissi S, Frauman AG, Wall JR (2004) Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: a practical guide to classification, natural history and management. Intern Med J 34:482–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carl A, Pedersen IB, Knudsen N et al (2011) Epidemiology of subtypes of hyperthyroidism in Denmark: a population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol 164:801–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham-Nordling M, Bystrom K, Torring O et al (2011) Incidence of hyperthyroidism in Sweden. Eur J Endocrinol 165:899–905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eckstein A, Schittkowski M, Esser J (2012) Surgical treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 26:339–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soeters M, van Zeijl C, Boelen A et al (2011) Optimal management of Graves orbitopathy: a multidisciplinary approach. Neth J Med 69:302–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boboridis K, Bunce C (2011) Surgical orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD007630

  10. Mourits M, Koornneef L, Wiersinga W, Prummel M, Berghout A, van der Gaag R (1989) Clinical criteria for the assessment of disease activity in Graves' ophthalmopathy: a novel approach. Br J Ophthalmol 73:639–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hosten N, Sander B, Cordes M, Schubert CJ, Schorner W, Felix R (1989) Graves ophthalmopathy: MR imaging of the orbits. Radiology 172:759–762

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sillaire I (2003) Graves' ophthalmopathy: usefulness of T2 weighted muscle signal intensity. J Radiol 84:139–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prummel MF, Gerding MN, Zonneveld FW, Wiersinga WM (2001) The usefulness of quantitative orbital magnetic resonance imaging in Graves' ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol 54:205–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taoka T, Iwasaki S, Uchida H (2000) Enhancement pattern of normal extraocular muscles in dynamic contrast-enhancement MR imaging with suppression. Acta Radiol 41:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taoka T (2005) Evaluation of extraocular muscles using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in patients with chronic thyroid orbitopathy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cakirer S (2004) Evaluation of extraocular muscles in the edematous phase of Graves ophthalmopathy on contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28:80–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sepahdari AR, Aakalu V, Setabutr P, Shiehmorteza M, Naheedy JH, Mafee MF (2010) Indeterminate orbital masses at MR imaging. Radiology 256:554–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Politi LS, Forghani R, Godi C et al (2010) Ocular adnexal lymphoma: diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for differential diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. Radiology 256:565–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Razek A, Elkhamary S, Mousa A (2011) Differentiation between benign and malignant orbital tumors at 3-T diffusion MR-imaging. Neuroradiology 53:517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sepahdari AR, Kapur R, Aakalu VK, Villablanca JP, Mafee MF (2012) Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant ocular masses: initial results and directions for further study. Am J Neuroradiol 33:314–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laurberg P, Berman DC, Bülow Pedersen I, Andersen S, Carlé A (2012) Incidence and clinical presentation of moderate to severe Graves' orbitopathy in a Danish population before and after iodine fortification of salt. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2325–2332

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirsch E, Kaim AH, Oliveira MGD, Gv A (2010) Correlation of signal intensity ratio on orbital MRI-TIRM and clinical activity score as a possible predictor of therapy response in Graves' orbitopathy-a pilot study at 1.5 T. Neuroradiology 52:91–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gonçalves AC, Silva LN, Gebrim EM, Monteiro ML (2012) Quantification of orbital apex crowding for screening of dysthyroid optic neuropathy using multidetector CT. Am J Neuroradiol 33:1602–1607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Müller-Forell W, Kahaly GJ (2012) Neuroimaging of Graves' orbitopathy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 26:259–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bijlsma WR (2006) Radiologic measurement of extraocular muscle volumes in patients with Graves' orbitopathy: a review and guideline. Orbit 25:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Letterio Salvatore Politi. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors (A.A.) has significant statistical expertise. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, observational, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Letterio Salvatore Politi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Figure 1

Box-plots comparing T2 SIR (A), T1Gad SIR (B) and n-ADC (C) values of healthy controls’ EOMs with those of TAO patients. EOMs of patients affected by TAO showed significantly higher T2 SIR, T1Gad SIR and n-ADC than those of healthy controls (Mann-Whitney test, p<0.001). (JPEG 15 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 3828 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

MRI features of a representative healthy control (A, D, G), clinically inactive TAO patient (B, E, H) and clinically active TAO patient (C, F, I) with axial Turbo Spin Echo T2 SPIR images (A, B, C), Spin Echo post-gadolinium T1 SPIR images (T1Gad, D, E, F) and ADC maps from Single-Shot Echo Planar (SSh-EPI) Diffusion Weighted Imaging (obtained with b=0-700, G, H, I). The patient with active TAO (right column) had more prominent T2 SPIR and T1Gad hyperintensity of EOMs (medial recti muscles) than the patient with inactive TAO (middle column), while in ADC maps no differences could be appreciated between the two. (JPEG 76 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 13510 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

Box-plots illustrating mean T2 SIR (A, D, G, J), T1Gad SIR (B, E, H, K) and n-ADC (C, F, I, L), in TAO patients with CAS reduction (A, B, C), and in TAO EOMs with motility improvement (D, E, F); a significant decrease between baseline and follow-up values was found in both cases (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test). Interestingly, a similarly significant reduction in mean T2 SIR, T1Gad SIR and n-ADC was also observed in TAO patients with stable CAS (G, H, I) and stable EOM function (J, K, L) over time (Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test). (JPEG 68 kb)

High resolution image (TIFF 17227 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Politi, L.S., Godi, C., Cammarata, G. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of thyroid-associated orbitopathy: getting below the tip of the iceberg. Eur Radiol 24, 1118–1126 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3103-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3103-3

Keywords

Navigation