Abstract
Objectives
We compared the three-dimensional (3D) double inversion recovery (DIR) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence with the coronal two-dimensional (2D) short tau inversion recovery (STIR) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) for the detection of optic nerve signal abnormality in patients with optic neuritis (ON).
Methods
The study group consisted of 31 patients with ON (44 pathological nerves) confirmed by visual-evoked potentials used as the reference. MRI examinations included 2D coronal STIR FLAIR and 3D DIR with 3-mm coronal reformats to match with STIR FLAIR. Image artefacts were graded for each portion of the optic nerves. Each set of MR images (2D STIR FLAIR, DIR reformats and multiplanar 3D DIR) was examined independently and separately for the detection of signal abnormality.
Results
Cisternal portion of optic nerves was better delineated with DIR (p < 0.001), while artefacts impaired analysis in four patients with STIR FLAIR. Inter-observer agreement was significantly improved (p < 0.001) on 3D DIR (κ = 0.96) compared with STIR FLAIR images (κ = 0.60). Multiplanar DIR images reached the best performance for the diagnosis of ON (95 % sensitive and 94 % specific).
Conclusions
Our study showed a high sensitivity and specificity of 3D DIR compared with STIR FLAIR for the detection of ON. These findings suggest that the 3D DIR sequence may be more useful in patients suspected of ON.
Key points
• 3D DIR is increasingly used in neuroradiology
• Compared with STIR FLAIR, 3D DIR improves detection of optic neuritis
• Multiplanar analysis had the best diagnostic performance for optic nerve signal abnormalities
• Sensitivity was 95 % and specificity 94 %
• Findings support the use of 3D DIR instead of 2D sequences
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CSF:
-
Cerebrospinal fluid
- ON:
-
Optic neuritis
- MS:
-
Multiple sclerosis
- RRMS:
-
Relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
- SPMS:
-
Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
- CIS:
-
Clinically isolated syndrome
- NMO:
-
Neuromyelitis optica
- DIR:
-
Double inversion recovery
- FLAIR:
-
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery
- ETL:
-
Echo train length
- TSE:
-
Turbo spin-echo
- STIR:
-
Short tau inversion recovery
- SPIR:
-
Spectral presaturation inversion recovery
- VEP:
-
Visual-evoked potentials
References
Brodsky MC, Beck RW (1994) The changing role of MR imaging in the evaluation of acute optic neuritis. Radiology 192:22–23
Gass A, Moseley IF, Barker GJ et al (1996) Lesion discrimination in optic neuritis using high-resolution fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MRI. Neuroradiology 38:317–321
Youl BD, Turano G, Miller DH et al (1991) The pathophysiology of acute optic neuritis. An association of gadolinium leakage with clinical and electrophysiological deficits. Brain 114:2437–2450
Hickman SJ, Miszkiel KA, Plant GT et al (2005) The optic nerve sheath on MRI in acute optic neuritis. Neuroradiology 47:51–55
Guy J, Mao J, Bidgood WD et al (1992) Enhancement and demyelination of the intraorbital optic nerve. Fat suppression magnetic resonance imaging. Ophthalmology 99:713–719
Hendrix LE, Kneeland JB, Haughton VM et al (1990) MR imaging of optic nerve lesions: value of gadopentetate dimeglumine and fat-suppression technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 155:849–854
Johnson G, Miller DH, MacManus D et al (1987) STIR sequences in NMR imaging of the optic nerve. Neuroradiology 29:238–245
Jackson A, Sheppard S, Johnson AC et al (1999) Combined fat- and water-suppressed MR imaging of orbital tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1963–1969
Aiken AH, Mukherjee P, Green AJ et al (2011) MR imaging of optic neuropathy with extended echo-train acquisition fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:301–305
McKinney AM, Lohman BD, Sarikaya B et al (2013) Accuracy of routine fat-suppressed FLAIR and diffusion-weighted images in detecting clinically evident optic neuritis. Acta Radiol 54:455–461
Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A et al (2006) Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 55:1030–1037
Tallantyre EC, Morgan PS, Dixon JE et al (2010) 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla MRI of multiple sclerosis cortical lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:971–977
Simon B, Schmidt S, Lukas C et al (2010) Improved in vivo detection of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis using double inversion recovery MR imaging at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 20:1675–1683
Nelson F, Poonawalla AH, Hou P et al (2007) Improved identification of intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis with phase-sensitive inversion recovery in combination with fast double inversion recovery MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1645–1649
Wattjes MP, Lutterbey GG, Gieseke J et al (2007) Double inversion recovery brain imaging at 3 T: diagnostic value in the detection of multiple sclerosis lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:54–59
Pouwels PJ, Kuijer JP, Mugler JP et al (2006) Human gray matter: feasibility of single-slab 3D double inversion-recovery high-spatial-resolution MR imaging. Radiology 241:873–879
Geurts JJ, Pouwels PJ, Uitdehaag BM et al (2005) Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 236:254–260
de Graaf WL, Zwanenburg JJ, Visser F et al (2012) Lesion detection at seven Tesla in multiple sclerosis using magnetisation prepared 3D-FLAIR and 3D-DIR. Eur Radiol 22:221–231
Harris RJ, Cloughesy TF, Pope WB et al (2013) Pre- and post-contrast three-dimensional double inversion-recovery MRI in human glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 112:257–266
Morimoto E, Kanagaki M, Okada T et al (2013) Anterior temporal lobe white matter abnormal signal (ATLAS) as an indicator of seizure focus laterality in temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison of double inversion recovery, FLAIR and T2W MR imaging. Euro Radiol 23:3–11
Nam Y, Kim EY, Kim DH (2011) On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:1218–1223
Genders TS, Spronk S, Stijnen T et al (2012) Methods for calculating sensitivity and specificity of clustered data: a tutorial. Radiology 265:910–916
Schouten HJ (1993) Estimating kappa from binocular data and comparing marginal probabilities. Stat Med 12:2207–2217
Lisanti C, Carlin C, Banks KP et al (2007) Normal MRI appearance and motion-related phenomena of CSF. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:716–725
Bakshi R, Caruthers SD, Janardhan V et al (2000) Intraventricular CSF pulsation artifact on fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MR images: analysis of 100 consecutive normal studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:503–508
Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Nakamura T et al (2004) Comparison of flow artifacts between 2D-FLAIR and 3D-FLAIR sequences at 3 T. Eur Radiol 14:1901–1908
Lummel N, Schoepf V, Burke M et al (2011) 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging: reduced CSF artifacts and enhanced sensitivity and specificity for subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:2054–2060
Hodel J, Leclerc X, Rodallec M et al (2013) Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities are not visible using 3D CUBE FLAIR sequence. Eur Radiol 23:1963–1969
Seewann A, Kooi EJ, Roosendaal SD et al (2012) Postmortem verification of MS cortical lesion detection with 3D DIR. Neurology 78:302–308
Acknowledgments
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Xavier Leclerc. The authors of this manuscript declare relationships with the following company: Philips Medical Systems.
David Chechin is an employee of Philips. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. Mohamed Amine Benadjaoud (co-author) has significant statistical expertise and kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript. No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Institutional Review Board approval was not required because all the patients included in this retrospective study accepted that their MR images could be use for publication. Written informed consent was not required because all the patients included in this retrospective study accepted that their MR images could be use for publication.Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodel, J., Outteryck, O., Bocher, AL. et al. Comparison of 3D double inversion recovery and 2D STIR FLAIR MR sequences for the imaging of optic neuritis: pilot study. Eur Radiol 24, 3069–3075 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3342-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3342-3