Skip to main content
Log in

Detailed anatomy of intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic parietal cephaloceles revealed by high-resolution 3D-CISS and high-field T2-weighted reversed MR images

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The advancement of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technology has revealed that intracranial venous anomalies, such as vertical embryonic positioning of the straight sinus (VEP of SS), are associated with atretic parietal cephaloceles. However, the precise anatomical relationships among the venous anomalies, superior sagittal sinus (SSS), cistern, and cephalocele have not been demonstrated. We compared the imaging features of conventional MR images and high-resolution 3-dimensional (3-D) MR images, such as Fourier-transformation-constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) images and T2-weighted reversed (T2R) images obtained on a 3-T MR machine.

Methods

Three patients ranging in age from 1 to 18 years, with midline subscalp lesions, participated in this study. In two cases, the lesions were surgically excised and subjected to pathological examination.

Results

In two children, 3-D MR images more clearly demonstrated anomalous veins, including bilateral internal cerebral veins, the great vein of Galen and the vertical position of the straight sinus in the falx, extending superiorly within the CSF tract in the posterior interhemispheric fissure. While the vertical straight sinus drained into the SSS, the CSF tract maintained a position posterior to the anomalous veins, ran through the SSS and extended to the skull defect. In one patient, ascending positioning of the anomalous vein from the inferior sagittal sinus to the SSS in the CSF space was observed; this could not be depicted on conventional MR images.

Conclusion

Detailed findings of the venous anomalies on 3-D MR images provide clues to the diagnosis of atretic cephalocele.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bale PM, Hughes L, De Silva M (1990) Sequestrated meningoceles of the scalp: extracranial meningeal heterotopia. Hum Pathol 21:1156–1163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brunelle F, Baraton J, Renier D, Teillac D, Simon I, Sonigo P, Hertz-Pannier L, Emond S, Boddaert N, Chigot V, Lellouch-Tubiana A (2000) Intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic cephaloceles. Pediatr Radiol 30:743–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Curnes JT, Oakes J (1988) Parietal cephaloceles: radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Pediatr Neurosci 14:71–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Drapkin AJ (1990) Rudimentary cephalocele or neural crest remnant? Neurosurgery 26:667–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujii Y, Nakayama N, Nakada T (1998) High-resolution T2-reversed magnetic resonance imaging on a high magnetic field system. Technical note. J Neurosurg 89:492–495

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gulati K, Phadke RV, Kumar R, Gupta RK (2000) Atretic cephalocele: contribution of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative diagnosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 33:208–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Güzel A, Tatli M, Er U, Bavbek M (2007) Atretic parietal cephalocele. Pediatric Neurosurg 43:72–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hashiguchi K, Morioka T, Fukui K, Miyagi Y, Mihara F, Yoshiura T, Nagata S, Sasaki T (2005) Usefulness of constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) MR imaging in the presurgical examination for lumbosacral lipoma. J Neurosurg (6 Pediatrics) 103:537–543

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hashiguchi K, Morioka T, Yoshida F, Miyagi Y, Mihara F, Yoshiura T, Nagata S, Sasaki T (2007) Feasibility and limitation of constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) MR imaging in neonates with lumbosacral myeloschisis. Neuroradiology 49:579–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Inoue Y, Hakuba A, Fujitani K, Fukuda T, Nemoto Y, Umekawa T, Kobayashi Y, Kitano H, Onoyama Y (1983) Occult cranium bifidum. Radiological and surgical findings. Neuroradiology 25:217–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marrogi AJ, Swanson PE, Kyriakos M, Wick MR (1991) Rudimentary meningocele of the skin. J Cutan Pathol 18:178–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez-Lage JF, Sola J, Casas C, Poza M, Almagro MJ, Girona DG (1992) Atretic cephalocele: the tip of the iceberg. J Neurosurg 77:230–235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McLaurin RL (1964) Parietal cephaloceles. Neurology 14:764–772

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McLone DG, De Leon G (1998) Atretic encephalocele. Pediatric Neurosurg 28:326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morioka T, Hashiguchi K, Yoshida F, Nagata S, Miyagi Y, Mihara F, Sasaki T (2007) Dynamic morphological changes in lumbosacral lipoma during the first months of life revealed by constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) MR imaging. Child’s Nerv Syst 23:415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morioka T, Hashiguchi K, Yoshida F, Matsumoto K, Miyagi Y, Nagata S, Yoshiura T, Masumoto K, Taguchi T, Sasaki T (2008) Neurosurgical management of occult spinal dysraphism associated with OEIS complex. Child’s Nerv Syst 24:723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Naidich TP, Altman NR, Braffman BH, McLone DG, Zimmerman RA (1992) Cephaloceles and related malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 13:655–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakada T (2007) Clinical application of high and ultra high-field MRI. Brain Dev 29:325–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Otsubo Y, Sato H, Sato N, Ito H (1999) Cephaloceles and abnormal venous drainage. Child’s Nerv Syst 15:329–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Padget DH (1956) The cranial venous system in man in reference to development, adult configuration, and relation to the arteries. Am J Anat 98:307–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Patterson RJ, Egelhoff JC, Crone KR, Ball WS Jr (1998) Atretic parietal cephaloceles revisited: An enlarging clinical and imaging spectrum? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:791–795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tubbs RS, Doughty K, Smyth MD, Oakes WJ (2004) Parietal cephalocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 40:37–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamazaki T, Enomoto T, Iguchi M, Nose T (2001) Atretic cephalocele. Report of two cases with special reference to embryology. Child’s Nerv Syst 17:674–678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yokota A, Kajiwara H, Kohchi M, Fuwa I, Wada H (1988) Parietal cephalocele: clinical importance of its atretic form and associated malformations. J Neurosurg 69:545–551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Mikiko Hidaka for administrative support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takato Morioka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morioka, T., Hashiguchi, K., Samura, K. et al. Detailed anatomy of intracranial venous anomalies associated with atretic parietal cephaloceles revealed by high-resolution 3D-CISS and high-field T2-weighted reversed MR images. Childs Nerv Syst 25, 309–315 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0721-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-008-0721-6

Keywords

Navigation