Skip to main content
Log in

Radiology Report Comparator: A Novel Method to Augment Resident Education

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Attending radiologists routinely edit radiology trainee dictated preliminary reports as part of standard workflow models. Time constraints, high volume, and spatial separation may not always facilitate clear discussion of these changes with trainees. However, these edits can represent significant teaching moments that are lost if they are not communicated back to trainees. We created an electronic method for retrieving and displaying changes made to resident written preliminary reports by attending radiologists during the process of radiology report finalization. The Radiology Information System is queried. Preliminary and final radiology reports, as well as report metadata, are extracted and stored in a database indexed by accession number and trainee/radiologist identity. A web application presents to trainees their 100 most recent preliminary and final report pairs both side by side and in a “track changes” mode. Web utilization audits showed regular utilization by trainees. Surveyed residents stated they compared reports for educational value, to improve future reports, and to improve patient care. Residents stated that they compared reports more frequently after deployment of this software solution and that regular assessment of their work using the Report Comparator allowed them to routinely improve future report quality and improved radiological understanding. In an era with increasing workload demands, trainee work hour restrictions, and decentralization of department resources (e.g., faculty, PACS), this solution helps to retain an important part of the educational experience that would have otherwise run the risk of being lost and provides it to the trainees in an efficient and highly consumable manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Wood B: Feedback: a key feature of medical training. Radiology 215:17–19, 2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sachdeva AK: Use of effective feedback to facilitate adult learning. J Cancer Educ 11:106–118, 1996

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ende J: Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 250:777–781, 1983

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nadler DA: Feedback and organization development: using databased methods. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  5. De SK, Henke PK, Ailawadi G, Dimick JB, Colletti LM: Attending, house officer, and medical student perceptions about teaching in the third-year medical school general surgery clerkship. J Am Coll Surg 199(6):932–942, 2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaffe CC, Lynch PJ: Computer aided instruction in radiology: opportunities for more effective learning. AJR 164:463–467, 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Sharpe Jr.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sharpe, R.E., Surrey, D., Gorniak, R.J.T. et al. Radiology Report Comparator: A Novel Method to Augment Resident Education. J Digit Imaging 25, 330–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9419-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9419-5

Keywords

Navigation