Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Methods for determination of language dominance: The wada test and proposed noninvasive alternatives

  • Published:
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure, also known as the Wada test, helps to lateralize language dominance by deactivating the language cortex with an intracarotid injection of an anesthetic agent. Although it has been the gold standard for determining language dominance for more than four decades, its invasiveness has prompted a search for noninvasive alternatives. Potential replacements have included neuropsychological techniques, measurements of anatomic brain asymmetries, magnetic stimulation for deactivation of language cortex, measurement of the electrical or magnetic neurophysiologic response to language activation, and methods that detect the hemodynamic response to activation of language cortex, namely increased local blood flow or increased local oxygenation. Based on widespread availability and the ability to provide localizing as well as lateralizing information, functional MRI will likely be the most widely used alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Abou-Khalil B: An update on determination of language dominance in screening for epilepsy surgery: the Wada test and newer noninvasive alternatives. Epilepsia 2007, 48:442–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abou-Khalil B, Schlaggar BL: Is it time to replace the Wada test? Neurology 2002, 59:160–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pelletier I, Sauerwein HC, Lepore F, et al.: Non-invasive alternatives to the Wada test in the presurgical evaluation of language and memory functions in epilepsy patients. Epileptic Disord 2007, 9:111–126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wada J, Rasmussen T: Intracarotid injection of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. J Neurosurg 1960, 17:266–282.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Abou-Khalil B: Insights into language mechanisms derived from the evaluation of epilepsy. In Handbook of Neurological Speech and Language Disorders, Edited by Kirshner HS. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1995:213–275.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loddenkemper T, Morris HH 3rd, Perl J 2nd: Carotid artery dissection after the intracarotid amobarbital test. Neurology 2002, 59:1797–1798.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takayama M, Miyamoto S, Ikeda A, et al.: Intracarotid propofol test for speech and memory dominance in man. Neurology 2004, 63:510–515.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchtel HA, Passaro EA, Selwa LM, et al.: Sodium methohexital (brevital) as an anesthetic in the Wada test. Epilepsia 2002, 43:1056–1061.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones-Gotman M, Sziklas V, Djordjevic J, et al.: Etomidate speech and memory test (eSAM): a new drug and improved intracarotid procedure. Neurology 2005, 65:1723–1729.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zatorre RJ: Perceptual asymmetry on the dichotic fused words test and cerebral speech lateralization determined by the carotid sodium amytal test. Neuropsychologia 1989, 27:1207–1219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strauss E, Wada J, Kosaka B: Visual laterality effects and cerebral speech dominance determined by the carotid Amytal test. Neuropsychologia 1985, 23:567–570.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Channon S, Schugens MM, Daum I, Polkey CE: Lateralisation of language functioning by the Wada procedure and divided visual field presentation of a verbal task. Cortex 1990, 26:147–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bethmann A, Tempelmann C, De Bleser R, et al.: Determining language laterality by fMRI and dichotic listening. Brain Res 2007, 1133:145–157.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pascual-Leone A, Gates JR, Dhuna A: Induction of speech arrest and counting errors with rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1991, 41:697–702.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennum P, Friberg L, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, Dam M: Speech localization using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1994, 44:269–273.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein CM, Lah JJ, Meador K, et al.: Optimum stimulus parameters for lateralized suppression of speech with magnetic brain stimulation. Neurology 1996, 47:1590–1593.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Epstein CM, Woodard JL, Stringer AY, et al.: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not replicate the Wada test. Neurology 2000, 55:1025–1027.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Charles PD, Abou-Khalil B, Atkinson DS Jr, et al.: Occipital pole area and language dominance. J Neuroimaging 1997, 7:89–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Charles PD, Abou-Khalil R, Abou-Khalil B, et al.: MRI asymmetries and language dominance. Neurology 1994, 44:2050–2054.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Foundas AL, Leonard CM, Gilmore R, et al.: Planum temporale asymmetry and language dominance. Neuropsychologia 1994, 32:1225–1231.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Foundas AL, Leonard CM, Gilmore RL, et al.: Pars triangularis asymmetry and language dominance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996, 93:719–722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dorsaint-Pierre R, Penhune VB, Watkins KE, et al.: Asymmetries of the planum temporale and Heschl’s gyrus: relationship to language lateralization. Brain 2006, 129:1164–1176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gerschlager W, Lalouschek W, Lehrner J, et al.: Language-related hemispheric asymmetry in healthy subjects and patients with temporal lobe epilepsy as studied by event-related brain potentials and intracarotid amobarbital test. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998, 108:274–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Papanicolaou AC, Simos PG, Castillo EM, et al.: Magnetocephalography: a noninvasive alternative to the Wada procedure. J Neurosurg 2004, 100:867–876.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bowyer SM, Moran JE, Weiland BJ, et al.: Language laterality determined by MEG mapping with MR-FOCUSS. Epilepsy Behav 2005, 6:235–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knecht S, Deppe M, Ringelstein EB, et al.: Reproducibility of functional transcranial Doppler sonography in determining hemispheric language lateralization. Stroke 1998, 29:1155–1159.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Knake S, Haag A, Hamer HM, et al.: Language lateralization in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison of functional transcranial Doppler sonography and the Wada test. Neuroimage 2003, 19:1228–1232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Borbely K, Gjedde A, Nyary I, et al.: Speech activation of language dominant hemisphere: a single-photon emission computed tomography study. Neuroimage 2003, 20:987–994.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hunter KE, Blaxton TA, Bookheimer SY, et al.: (15)O water positron emission tomography in language localization: a study comparing positron emission tomography visual and computerized region of interest analysis with the Wada test. Ann Neurol 1999, 45:662–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tatlidil R, Xiong J, Luther S: Presurgical lateralization of seizure focus and language dominant hemisphere with O-15 water PET imaging. Acta Neurol Scand 2000, 102:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Watanabe E, Maki A, Kawaguchi F, et al.: Non-invasive assessment of language dominance with near-infrared spectroscopic mapping. Neurosci Lett 1998, 256:49–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Watson NF, Dodrill C, Farrell D, et al.: Determination of language dominance with near-infrared spectroscopy: comparison with the intracarotid amobarbital procedure. Seizure 2004, 13:399–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yetkin FZ, Swanson S, Fischer M, et al.: Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998, 19:1095–1098.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Woermann FG, Jokeit H, Luerding R, et al.: Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy. Neurology 2003, 61:699–701.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaillard WD, Balsamo L, Xu B, et al.: Language dominance in partial epilepsy patients identified with an fMRI reading task. Neurology 2002, 59:256–265.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Desmond JE, Sum JM, Wagner AD, et al.: Functional MRI measurement of language lateralization in Wada-tested patients. Brain 1995, 118(Pt 6):1411–1419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, et al.: Determination of language dominance using functional MRI: a comparison with the Wada test. Neurology 1996, 46:978–984.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Sabsevitz DS, Swanson SJ, Hammeke TA, et al.: Use of preoperative functional neuroimaging to predict language deficits from epilepsy surgery. Neurology 2003, 60:1788–1792.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Benke T, Koylu B, Visani P, et al.: Language lateralization in temporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between fMRI and the Wada Test. Epilepsia 2006, 47:1308–1319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gaillard WD, Balsamo L, Xu B, et al.: fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance. Neurology 2004, 63:1403–1408.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rutten GJ, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, et al.: FMRI-determined language lateralization in patients with unilateral or mixed language dominance according to the Wada test. Neuroimage 2002, 17:447–460.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Xiong J, Rao S, Gao JH, et al.: Evaluation of hemispheric dominance for language using functional MRI: a comparison with positron emission tomography. Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6:42–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kennan RP, Kim D, Maki A, et al.: Non-invasive assessment of language lateralization by transcranial near infrared optical topography and functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2002, 16:183–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lehericy S, Biondi A, Sourour N, et al.: Arteriovenous brain malformations: is functional MR imaging reliable for studying language reorganization in patients? Initial observations. Radiology 2002, 223:672–682.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kamada K, Sawamura Y, Takeuchi F, et al.: Expressive and receptive language areas determined by a non-invasive reliable method using functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography. Neurosurgery 2007, 60:296–305; discussion 305–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Breier JI, Simos PG, Zouridakis G, Papanicolaou AC: Relative timing of neuronal activity in distinct temporal lobe areas during a recognition memory task for words. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998, 20:782–790.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Janszky J, Jokeit H, Kontopoulou K, et al.: Functional MRI predicts memory performance after right mesiotemporal epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia 2005, 46:244–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rabin ML, Narayan VM, Kimberg DY, et al.: Functional MRI predicts post-surgical memory following temporal lobectomy. Brain 2004, 127:2286–2298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Richardson MP, Strange BA, Thompson PJ, et al.: Preoperative verbal memory fMRI predicts post-operative memory decline after left temporal lobe resection. Brain 2004, 127:2419–2426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bassel Abou-Khalil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abou-Khalil, B. Methods for determination of language dominance: The wada test and proposed noninvasive alternatives. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 7, 483–490 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-007-0075-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-007-0075-6

Keywords

Navigation